Analysis of Errors in Problems of Physiopathological Discrimination among Subjects

  • G. Belforte
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics book series (LNMED, volume 9)


Since Sir Ronald Fisher (1) proposed in 1935 a discriminant function analysis with an application to a taxonomic problem,many methods for classifying subjects into one of a set of classes, given a series of measurements made on each subject, have been extensively developed.


Probability Density Function Posteriori Probability Discriminant Function Analysis Hepatobiliary Disease Taxonomic Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fisher, R.A., “The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems,” Annals of Eugenics, 7: 179–188. (1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wagner, G., Tautu, P., Wolber, U., “Problems of medical diagnosis — A bibliography,” Meth. Inform. Med. 17: 55–74, (1978).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Editorial, “Special issue on statistical methods for clinical decision making,” J.Roy.Coll.Physicns London, 9: 191–269, (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    “Issue on decision making in health care”, New Engl. J. Med., 293: 211–244, (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mendel, J.M., Fu, K.S., Adaptive, learning and pattern recognition systems, Academic Press, New York, (1970).MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fukunaga, K., Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, Academic Press, New York, (1972).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meisel, W.S., Computer-oriented approaches to pattern recognition, Academic Press, New York, (1972).MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson, T.W., An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York,(1962KGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geisser,S., Posteriori adds for multivariate normal classification,” J.Roy. Statist.Soc. Ser. B., 26: 69–76, (1964).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parzen, E., “An estimation of a probability density function and mod,” Ann. Math. Stat., 33: 1065–1076, (1962).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murthy, V.K., “Nonparametric estimator of multivariate densities with applications,” Multivariate Analysis (P.R. Krushnaiah, Ed.) pp. 43–56, Academic Press, New York, (1966).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aitchison, J., Aitken, C.G.G., “Multivariate binary discrimination by the Kernel method,” Biometrica 63: 413–420, (1976).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lachenbruch, P.A., Mickey, M.R., “Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis,” Technometrics, 10:n.1, (February, 1968 ).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hills, M., “Allocation rules and error rates,” J.Roy.Stat.Soc. Ser. B, 28: 1–31, (1966).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cornefield, J., “Discriminant functions,” Rev. Intern Stat. Inst., 35: 142–153, (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lachenbruch, P.A., “On expected probabilities of misclassification in (Jiscriminant analysis, necessary sample size and relation with the multiple correlation coefficient,” Biometrics, 24: p. 4,823–833, (December, 1968 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lachenbruch, P.A., “An almost unbiased method of obtaining confidenct intervals for the probability of misclassification in discriminant analysis,”Biometrics, 23: n.4, 639–645, (December, 1967 ).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cochran, W.G., Hopkins, C.E., “Some problem with multivariant qualitative dat#,”Biometrics, 17: 10–32, (1961).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dunn, O.J., Varady, P.D., “Probabilities of correct classification in discriminant analysis,” Biometrics, 22: 908–924, (December, 1966 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition, Kyoto,(November, 1978.)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sorum, M., “Estimating the expected and the optimal probabilities of misclassification,” Technometrics, 14;. n.4, 935–943, (November, 1972 ).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hermans, J., Habbema, J.D.F., “Comparison of five methods to estimate posteriori probabilities,” EDV in Medizin und Biologie, 6: 14–19, (1975).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aitchison, J., Habbema, J.D.F., Hay, J.W., “A critical comparison of two methods of statistical discrimination,” J.Roy.Stat.Soc.Ser.C, 26: n.1, 15–25,(1977.)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schaafsma, W., van Vark, G.N., “Classification and discrimination problems withapplication, Part I,” Statistica Neerlandica, 24–45, (1977).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McLachlan, G.J., “The bias of sample based posteriori probabilities,” Biom. J., 19: n. 6, 421–426, (1977).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Belforte, G.,“Evaluation of errors when using a Bayes classification procedure,” Internal Report CENS-CNR,(Torino 1979.)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Molino, G., Milanese, M., Villa, A., “Discrimination of hepatobiliary diseases by evaluation of BSP blood kinetics,” J.Lab.Clin.Med., 91: 3, (1978).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Milanese, M., Molino, G., “Structural identifiability of compartmental models and pathophysiological information from the kinetics of drugs,”Math.Biosc., 26 (1975).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Molino, G., Milanese, M., “Structural analysis of compartmental models for the hepatic kinetics of drugs,” J.Lab.Clin.Med. 85: 865–878, (1975).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Belforte, G., Molino, G., Rossi, G., “A new routine test to discriminate among subjects with different hepatic diseases,” 1st Mediterranean Conf. on Med. and Biol. Eng., Sorrento, Italy,(September, 1977.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Online Conferences Ltd., Uxbridge, England 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Belforte

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations