Abstract
The human eye is wired for Gestalt, for recognition rather than quantification. It is notoriously bad at apprehending population variance. A catalog or key setting forth a variety of typical forms for a phenomenon, such as that for leaf shape in Fig. IX-1, does not specify in any way how one might describe forms within a family (e.g. the growing leaf, its shape constantly changing) or assign particular specimens, always more or less idiosyncratic, to particular types. Such a classification should rather arise from a thoroughgoing quantification along the various lines I have pursued in this essay. The study of all form is the study of comparative or growing form, and the necessary quantifications are all based in the geometry of ordinary planes and space.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bookstein, F.L. (1978). Envoi. In: The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 24. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93093-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93093-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-08912-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93093-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive