Advertisement

Needs for the Future: Radically Different Types of Mathematical Models

  • Mary B. Williams
Part of the Lecture Notes in Biomathematics book series (LNBM, volume 13)

Abstract

Since parts of future biomathematics which involve further development along directions already predominant can be extrapolated from the other papers in the volume, the purpose of this paper is to investigate less obvious, and therefore more speculative, directions. In particular, I intend to show reason to suspect that the laws of biology are of a different mathematical form than the laws of physics and that, therefore, the mathematical models of the future in biology will be radically different from the models used in physics. I will primarily concentrate on casting doubt on the ultimate usefulness of many differential equations models by examining the extent to which the mathematical assumptions underlying these models reflect biological reality. Since these mathematical assumptions seem to be seriously discordant with important parts of biological reality, this type of mathematical model should ultimately be replaced by essentially different types of mathematical models.

Keywords

Evolutionary Theory Elapse Time Tree Trunk Differential Equation Model Biological Reality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bergman, Gustav; Philosophy of Science; University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI; 1957.Google Scholar
  2. Ford, E. B.; Ecological Genetics; Methuen ( Wiley ); New York; 1964.Google Scholar
  3. Williams, Mary B.; ‘Deducing the Consequences of Evolution: A Mathematical Model’, J. Theoret. Biol. 29 (1970) 343–385.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Williams, Mary B.; ‘Falsifiable Predictions of Evolutionary Theory’, Phil. of Science, vol 40, no. 4, December 1973, 518–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary B. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations