Discrimination of Homogeneous Double Pulses of light

  • Robert M. Boynton
Part of the Handbook of Sensory Physiology book series (SENSORY, volume 7 / 4)

Abstract

When two pulses1 of light are delivered successively to the same part of the retina, they may or may not be seen. If seen, they may appear as two flashes separated by a definite dark interval, or they may be perceived instead as a single flash that seems to vary from bright to dim and back again to bright. Sometimes a single flash will be seen as having a subtle flickering appearance that barely suggests the temporal inhomogeneity of the double-pulse that produced it. At still other times the double-pulse may be indistinguishable from a single pulse, either because it appears as a distinctly unitary event, or because, under the given set of experimental conditions, a single pulse may itself sometimes be seen as a double flash.

Keywords

Retina Immobilization Autocorrelation Hunt Kelly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, F.: The persistence of vision. Amer. J. physiol. Opt. 7, 439–457 (1926).Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. A., Huntington, J., Simonson, E.: Critical flicker frequency as a function of exposure time. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 56, 1607–1611 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anliker, J.: Simultaneous changes in visual separation threshold and voltage of cortical alpha rhythm. Science 153, 316–318 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. d’Arcy, C.: Sur la durée de la sensation de la vue. Mém. Acad. roy. Sci. (Paris) 37, 700–718 (1773).Google Scholar
  5. Baker, H. D.: The instantaneous threshold and early dark adaptation. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 43, 798–803 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartley, S. H.: Vision: A study of its basis. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1941.Google Scholar
  7. Bartley, S. H., Wilkinson, F. W.: Certain factors in producing complexity of responses to a single pulse of light. J. Psychol. 9, 299–306 (1953).Google Scholar
  8. Barlow, H. B.: Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 141, 337–350 (1958).Google Scholar
  9. Battersby, W. S., Depabaugh, G. L.: Neural limitations of visual excitability: after-effects of subliminal stimulation. Vision Res. 9, 757–768 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Battersby, W. S., Japfe, R.: Temporal factors influencing the perception of visual flicker. J. exp. Psychol. 46, 154–161 (1953).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Battersby, W. S., Oesterreich, R. E., Sturr, J. F.: Neural limitations of visual excitability. VII. Non-homonymous retrochiasmal interaction. Amer. J. Physiol. 206, 1181–1188 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Battersby, W. S., Schuckman, H.: The time course of temporal summation. Vision Res. 10, 263–272 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Battersby, W. S., Sturr, J. F.: Neural limitations of visual excitability. IX. Monocular and binocular changes of sensitivity during flicker stimulation. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 60, 121–126 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baumgardt, E., Hillman, B.: Duration and size as determinants of peripheral retinal response. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 51, 340–344 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baumgardt, E., Segal, J.: Un dispositif permettant de réaliser des stimuli lumineux de durée ultracourte et de forme quelconque, mais constante. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 140, 231 (1946).Google Scholar
  16. Beams, J. W.: The eye as an integrator of short light flashes. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 25, 48 (1935).Google Scholar
  17. Blackwell, H. R.: Contrast thresholds of the human eye. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 36, 624–643 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Beams, J. W.: Neural theories of simple visual discrimination. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 53, 129–160 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bloch, A. M.: Experiences sur la vision. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 2, 493–495 (1885).Google Scholar
  20. Bouman, M. A., van den Brink, G.: Absolute thresholds for moving point sources. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 43, 895–898 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boynton, R. M.: Some temporal factors in vision. Chapter 37 in Sensory Communication, Rosenblith, W. (Ed.), pp. 739–756. New York: Wiley 1961.Google Scholar
  22. Boynton, R. M., Kandel, G.: On-responses of the human visual system as a function of adaptation level. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 47, 275–286 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Boynton, R. M., Siegfried, J.: Psychophysical estimates of on-responses to brief light flashes. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 52, 720–721 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Boynton, R. M., Stiles, W. S., Ikeda, M.: Interactions among chromatic mechanisms as inferred from positive and negative increment thresholds. Vision Res. 4, 87–117 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Boynton, R. M., Sturr, J. F., Ikeda, M.: Study of flicker by increment threshold technique. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 51, 196–201 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Boynton, R. M., Whitten, D. N.: Visual adaptation in monkey cones: recordings of late receptor potentials. Science 170, 1423–1426 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Brindley, G. S.: The Bunsen-Roscoe law for the human eye at very short durations. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 118, 135–139 (1952).Google Scholar
  28. Brown, K. T., Watanabe, K., Murakami, M.: The early and late receptor potentials of monkey cones and rods. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 457–482 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cheatham, P. G., White, C. T.: Temporal numerosity: I. Perceived number as a function of flash number and rate. J. exp. Psychol. 44, 447–451 (1952).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Clark, W. C., Pickett, R.: Luminance required to detect the presence of a dark interval between two pulses of light. Amer. Psychologist 14, 412 (1959).Google Scholar
  31. Crawford, B. H.: Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli. Proc. roy. Soc. (Lond.) B 134, 283–302 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Davy, E.: The intensity-time relation for multiple flashes of light in the peripheral retina. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 42, 937–941 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dunlap, K.: The shortest perceptible time interval between two flashes of light. Psychol. Rev. 22, 226–250 (1915).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Efron, R.: The relationship between the duration of a stimulus and the duration of a perception. Neuropsychologia 8, 37–55 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gilmer, T. E.: The integrating power of the eye for short flashes of light. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 27, 386–388 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Graham, C. H., Kemp, E. H.: Brightness discrimination as a function of the duration of the increment in intensity. J. gen. Physiol. 21, 635–650 (1938).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Graham, C. H., Margaria, R.: Area and the intensity-time relation in the peripheral retina. Amer. J. Physiol. 113, 299–305 (1935).Google Scholar
  38. Granit, R., Hammond, E. L.: The sensation-time curve and the fusion frequency of intermittent stimulation. Amer. J. Physiol. 98, 654–663 (1931).Google Scholar
  39. Granit, R., Ammon, W. von: Comparative studies on the peripheral and central retina. III. Some aspects of local adaptation. Amer. J. Physiol. 95, 229–241 (1930).Google Scholar
  40. Grossberg, M.: Frequencies and latencies in detecting two-flash stimuli. Perc. Psychophys. 7, 377–380 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haber, R. N.: Information-Processing Approaches to Visual Perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1969.Google Scholar
  42. Hecht, S., Shlaer, S., Pirenne, M. H.: Energy at the threshold of vision. Science 93, 585–587 (1941).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Herrick, R. M.: Foveal luminance discrimination as a function of the duration of the decrement or increment in luminance. J. comp, physiol. Psychol. 49, 437–443 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hurvich, L. M., Jameson, D.: Vision in intermittent light. Translation of Piéron, H. (1961). La vision en lumière intermittente. In: Contributions to Sensory Physiology, Vol. 1. Neff, W. D. (Ed.). New York: Academic Press 1965.Google Scholar
  45. Ikeda, M.: Further use of the summation index for the study of color vision. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 54, 84–94 (1964).Google Scholar
  46. Ikeda, M.: Temporal summation of positive and negative flashes in the visual system. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 55, 1527–1534 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ikeda, M., Boynton, R. M.: Negative flashes, positive flashes, and flicker examined by increment threshold technique. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 55, 560–566 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kahneman, D.: Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychol. Bull. 70, 404–425 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kandel, G.: A psychophysical study of some monocular and binocular factors in early adaptation. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Rochester, 1958.Google Scholar
  50. Keston, R.: Temporal chromatic induction: the interaction of two successive pulses measured by subjective estimates. Amer. J. Psychol. 78, 264–270 (1965).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kietzman, M. L.: Two-pulse measures of temporal resolution as a function of stimulus energy. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 57, 809–813 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kietzman, M., Sutton, S.: The interpretation of two-pulse measures of temporal resolution in vision. Vision Res.8, 287–302 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kintz, R. T., Boynton, R. M.: Temporal summation during backward visual masking. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 59, 212–216 (199.Google Scholar
  54. De Lange, H.: Relationship between critical flicker frequency and a set of low frequency characteristics of the eye. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 44, 380–389 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Levinson, J.: Flicker fusion phenomena. Science 160, 21–28 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lewis, M. F.: Two-flash thresholds as a function of luminance in the dark-adapted eye. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 57, 814–815 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lewis, M. F.: Two-flash thresholds as a function of flash luminance and area. Perc. Psychophys. 4, 241–244 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mahneke, A.: Foveal discrimination measured with two successive light flashes: a psychophysical study. Acta ophthal. (Kbh.) 36, 3–11 (1958a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mahneke, A.: Fusion thresholds of the human eye as measured with two or several light flashes. Acta Ophthal. (Kbh.) 36, 12–18 (1958b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mita, T., Hironaka, K., Koike, I.: The influence of retinal adaptation and location on the Empfindungszeit. Tohoku J. exp. Med. 52, 397–405 (1950).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nelson, T. M., Bartley, S. H., Ranney, J. E.: The sensory parallel of the reorganization period in the cortical response in intermittent retinal stimulation. J. Psychol. 52, 137–147 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nelson, T. N., Bartley, S. H., Harper, E. S.: Cf. for short trains of photic stimulation having various temporal distributions and separations. J. Psychol. 58, 333–341 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Onley, J. W., Boynton, R. M.: Visual responses to equally-bright stimuli of unequal luminance. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 52, 934–940 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Préron, H.: La Vision en Lumière Intermittente. Monographes Françaises de Psychologie No. 8, Centre National de la Récherche Scientifique. Paris 1961.Google Scholar
  65. Plateau, J.: Dissertation sur quelques propriétés des impressions produites par la lumière sur l’organe de la vue. 1–32. Liege: Dessain 1829.Google Scholar
  66. Pollack, W. T.: The visibility of a target as a function of its speed of movement. J. exp. Psychol. 45, 449–454 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rashbass, C.: The visibility of transient changes of luminance. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 210, 165–186 (1970).Google Scholar
  68. Segner, J. A.: De raritate Luminis. 1–12. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck (1740).Google Scholar
  69. Sperling, G.: Temporal and spatial visual masking. I. Masking by impulse flashes. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 55, 541–559 (1965).Google Scholar
  70. Sperling, H. G., Jollifpe, C. L.: Intensity-time relationship at threshold for spectral stimuli in human vision. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 55, 191–199 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sturr, J. F.: Psychophysical measures of on-responses to fight flashes of unequal duration. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Rochester, 1961.Google Scholar
  72. van den Brink, G.: Retinal summation and the visibility of moving objects. Thesis, Utrecht, 1957. Report WW 1957–1959, Institute for Perception RVO-TNO, Soesterberg, Nether-Netherlands.Google Scholar
  73. van den Brink, G., Bouman, M. A.: Variation of integrative actions in the retinal system: an adaptational phenomenon. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 44, 616–620 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wagman, I. H., Battersby, W. S.: Neural limitations of visual excitability: II. Retrochiasmal interaction. Amer. J. Physiol. 197, 1237–1242 (1959).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag, Berlin · Heidelberg 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Boynton
    • 1
  1. 1.RochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations