Skip to main content

Histopathological Findings

  • Conference paper
Viscoelastic Substances
  • 50 Accesses

Abstract

In the mid-1970s and continuing into the 1980s, as an explosion in the number of intraocular lens (IOL) implantations occurred, the major concern of surgeons was to perfect their preferred surgical implantation technique. Even as the technology improved, it became evident that various complications following cataract surgery and IOL implantation still occasionally occurred. These were sometimes caused by surgical difficulties, inappropriate lens designs, and/or manufacturing defects. By the early 1980s, it became clear the surgeons needed to not only perfect their surgical insertion procedures, but also needed to be concerned with the surgical techniques required for removal of the IOL when necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Choyce DP (1985) Explantation (letter to the editor). J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 11: 593

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raju VK (1986) Terminology (letter to the editor). J Cataract Refract Surg 12: 291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apple DJ, Kincaid MC (1985) Histopathology of intraocular lens explantation. Cataract 2(7): 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Apple DJ et al. (1984) Complications of intraocular lenses. A historical and histopathological review. Surv Ophthalmol 29: 1–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shepard DD (1979) The fate of eyes from which intraocular lenses have been removed. Ophthalmic Surg 10(12): 58–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tennant JL (1979) Removal of intraocular lenses. In: Wainstock MA (ed) Intraocular implants: Update 1979. Int Opthalmic Clin 19 (3): 195-209

    Google Scholar 

  7. Severin SL (1985) Explantation — the other side of the coin. Cataract 2: 20–23

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hagan JC III (1984) Complications while removing the Iolab 91 Z lens for the UGH-UGH+ syndrome. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 10: 209–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hagan JC III (1984) A comparative study of the 91 Z and other anterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 10: 324–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Irvine AR (1980) Extracapsular cataract extraction and pseudophakos implantation in primates: a clinico-pathologic study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 78: 780–807

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Irvine AR, Crawford JB (1983) Histopathologic study of lens implants in humans and animals. Ophthalmic Forum 1(3): 15–18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kraff MC (1983) IOL update; types of intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic Forum 1(2): 50–51

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mamalis N et al. (1984) Pathological and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the 91 Z intraocular lens. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 10: 191–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller D, Stegmann R (1980) Use of Na-hyaluronate in anterior segment eye surgery. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 6: 13–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosen E (1986) A review of viscosurgical applications in cataract surgery. In: Eisner G (ed) Ophthalmic Viscosurgery. Medicopea International, Montreal, pp 76-84

    Google Scholar 

  16. Apple DJ et al. (1987) Anterior chamber lenses. Part I: Complications and pathology and a review of designs. Part II: A laboratory study. J Cataract Refract Surg 13: 157–174 and 175-189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen V, Moisseiev J, Blumenthal M (1985) Explantation of intraocular lenses — report from Israel. Cataract 2(8): 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kraff MC, Sander DR, Raanan MG (1985) A survey of intraocular lens explantations. J Cataract Refract Surg 12: 644–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Olson RJ (1985) Intraocular lenses requiring explantation-an overview. Cataract 2(7): 30–33

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reidy JJ et al. (1985) An analysis of semiflexible, closed-loop anterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 11: 344–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rowsey JJ (1979) Peripheral anterior synechiae and intraocular lenses. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 5: 307–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rowsey JJ, Gaylor JR (1980) Intraocular lens disasters; peripheral anterior synechia. Ophthalmology 87: 646–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roper DL (1981) Safety suture for removal of Choyce-style intraocular implants through a keratoplasty incision. Contact Intraocul Lens Med J 7: 159–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shaw EL (1979) “Removing a square peg through a round hole” or a new technique for the removal of Choyce style anterior chamber lenses through a keratoplasty incision. Contact Intraocul Lens Med J 5: 182–185

    Google Scholar 

  25. Apple DJ, Olson RJ (1987) Closed-loop anterior chamber lenses (letter to the editor). Arch Ophthalmol 105: 19–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffer KJ (1984) Rapid fibrosis of ORC Stableflex haptics (letter to the editor). J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 10: 470–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffer KJ (1985) Removing the Stableflex lens (letter to the editor). J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 11: 484

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Isenberg RA et al. (1986) Histopathologic and scanning electron microscopic study of one type of intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol 104: 683–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Poleski SA, Willis WE (1984) Angle-supported intraocular lenses: A goniophoto-graphic study. Ophthalmology 91: 838–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Apple, D.J. (1990). Histopathological Findings. In: Hoffmann, K., Hockwin, O. (eds) Viscoelastic Substances. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88653-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88653-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52642-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-88653-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics