Functional Components of Systems Controlling Behavior in Some Primitive Animals
The ultimate goal of a behavorial physiologist is to erect a complete, causal explanation for the total behavior of the organism which he is studying. The nature of the explanation which would be considered adequate depends to a large extent on the interests of the investigator and the level at which he works. For a behaviorist an acceptable explanation might be composed of concepts such as drives, consummatory acts and innate releasing mechanisms, while an electrophysiologist might want an explanation in terms like spike initiating loci, accommodation, and excitatory post-synaptic potentials. But at any level the goal of completely explaining the behavior of an animal is in most cases rather unrealistic. The complexity of the behavior of most animals precludes the possibility of complete analysis, at least in the near future, and investigators generally must content themselves with analyzing portions of the total behavioral repertoire; treating subsystems which ideally are complex enough to be interesting yet simple enough to be analyzable. The results considered in this paper come from work with coelenterates, animals which I feel are exceptional in that a complete analysis of their behavior is perhaps not an unrealistic goal.
KeywordsConducting System Stimulus Interval Trigger System Spontaneous Behavior Potential Pacemaker
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Horridge, G. A. The nerves and muscles of medusae. VI. The rhythm. J. Exp. Biol., 36:72–91, 1959.Google Scholar
- Josephson, R. K. Three parallel conducting systems in the stalk of a hydroid. J. Exp. Biol., 42:139–152, 1965a.Google Scholar
- Josephson, R. K. The coordination of potential pacemakers in the hydroid Tubularia. Amer. Zool., 5:483–490, 1965b.Google Scholar
- Josephson, R. K. Neuromuscular transmission in a sea anemone. J. Exp. Biol., 45:305–319, 1966.Google Scholar
- Josephson, R. K. and G. O. Mackie. Mutiple pacemakers and the behaviour of the hydroid Tubularia. Google Scholar
- Josephson, R. K. R. F. Reiss and R. M. Worthy. A simulation study of a diffuse conducting system based on coelenterate nerve nets. J. Theoret. Biol., 1:460–487, 1961.Google Scholar
- Mackie, G. O. Conduction in the nerve-free epithelia of siphonophores. Amer. Zool., 5:439–453, 1965.Google Scholar
- Pantin, C. F. A. The nerve net of the Actinozoa. I. Facilitation. J. Exp. Biol., 12:119–138, 1935.Google Scholar
- Pantin, C. F. A. Capabilities of the coelenterate behavior machine. Amer. Zool, 5:581–589, 1965.Google Scholar
- Passano, L. M. and C. B. McCullough. Co-ordinating systems and behaviour in Hydra. I. Pacemaker system of the periodic contractions. J. Exp. Biol., 41:643–664, 1964.Google Scholar
- Passano, L. M. and C. B. McCullough. Co-ordinating systems and behaviour in Hydra. II. The rhythmic potential system. J. Exp. Biol., 42:205–231, 1965.Google Scholar