Skip to main content
  • 409 Accesses

Abstract

Classification cost increases with the number of features used to describe pixel vectors in multispectral space — i. e. with the number of spectral bands associated with a pixel. For classifiers such as the parallelepiped and minimum distance procedures this is a linear increase with features; however for maximum likelihood classification, the procedure most often preferred, the cost increase with features is quadratic. Therefore it is sensible economically to ensure that no more features than necessary are utilised when performing a classification. Features which do not aid discrimination, by contributing little to the separability of spectral classes, should be discarded since they will represent a cost burden. Removal of least effective features is referred to as feature selection, this being one form of feature reduction. The other is to transform the pixel vector into a new set of co-ordinates in which the features that can be removed are made more evident. Both procedures are considered in some detail in this Chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References for Chapter 10

  • N. A. Campbell and W. R. Atchley, 1981: The Geometry of Canonical Variate Analysis. Systematic Zoology, 30, 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.O. Duda & P.E. Hart, 1973: Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, N.Y., Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Eppler, 1976: Canonical Analysis for Increased Classification Speed and Channel Selection, IEEE Trans. Geoscience Electronics, GE-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM, 1976: ER-MAN II User’s Manual, Program Number 5790-ABR, Belgium, IBM.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.K. Jensen & F.A. Waltz, 1979: Principal Components Analysis and Canonical Analysis in Remote Sensing, Proc. American Soc. of Photogrammetry 45th Ann. Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Kailath, 1967: The Divergence and Bhattacharyya Distance Measures in Signal Selection, IEEE Trans. Communication Theory, COM-15, 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.W. Mausel, W.J. Kramber and J.K. Lee, 1990: Optimum Band Selection for Supervised Classification of Multispectral Data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56, 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.F. Merembeck, F.Y. Borden, M.H. Podwysocki & D.N. Applegate, 1977: Application of Canonical Analysis to Multispectral Scanner Data, Proc. 14th Symp. Applications of Computer Methods in the Mineral Industry, N.Y., AIMMPE.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.F. Merembeck & B.J. Turner, 1980: Directed Canonical Analysis and the Performance of Classifiers under its Associated Linear Transformation, IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-18, 190–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. I. Myers, 1983: Remote Sensing Applications in Agricuhure. In R. N. Colwell (Ed.) Manual of Remote Sensing, 2e, American Soc. of Photogrammetry, Falls Church.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.L. Phillips (Ed.), 1973: LARSYS Version 3 Users Manual, Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing, Purdue University, West Lafayette.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Seal, 1964: Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Biologists. London, Menthuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Swain & S.M. Davis, (Eds.), 1978: Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach, N.Y., McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Swain & R.C. King, 1973: Two Effective Feature Selection Criteria for Multispectral Remote Sensing, Proc. First Int. Joint Conf. on Pattern Recognition, 536–540, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. H. Swain, T. V. Robertson & A. G. Wacker, 1971: Comparison of Divergence and B-Distance in Feature Selection, Information Note 020871, Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing, Purdue University, West Lafayette.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Tatsuoka, 1971: Multivariate Analysis, N.Y., Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. G. Wacker, 1971: The Minimum Distance Approach to Classification, Ph. D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richards, J.A. (1993). Feature Reduction. In: Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88087-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88087-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58219-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-88087-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics