Advertisement

Review on Electron Microscope Studies of Limestones

  • Erik Flügel
  • Helmut E. Franz
  • Wilhelm F. Ott

Abstract

Electron microscope studies of limestones are reviewed based on own studies and on the evaluation of published data. Further investigations should draw more attention to the possibility of recognition of diagenetic processes.

Keywords

Electron Micrographs Electron Microscope Study Grain Shape Lower Devonian Shallow Marine Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albissin, M. D: Une application du microscope électronique à l’étude de la déformation des calcaires. Rev. Géogr. phys. Géol. dyn. (2), 2, 35–38 (1959).Google Scholar
  2. Albissin, M. D: Les traces de la déformation dans les roches calcaires. Rev. Géogr. phys. Géol. dyn. (1961–62), fase. suppl. 1963, 3–155 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. Albissin, M. D: et C. DE RANGO: Etude de la microstructure des roches calcaires par l’observation au microscope électronique de l’orientation des figures de corrosion. Bull. Soc. franç. Min. Cristall. 85, 170–176 (1962).Google Scholar
  4. Alonso, J., et B. Agulleiro: Etude des roches carbonatées espagnoles. Sixth Internat. Congress Electron Microscopy, Kyoto, p. 647–648 (1966).Google Scholar
  5. Chave, K. E.: Early diagenesis of carbonate particles in calstic sediments. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 50 /3, 607 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. Cloud, P. E.: Environment of calcium carbonate deposition West of Andros Island, Bahamas. U.S. Geol. Survey Profess. Papers 350, 138 p. (1962).Google Scholar
  7. Farinacci, A.: Microorganismi dei Calcari “Maiolica” e “Scaglia” osservati al microscopio elettronico (Nannoconi e Coccolithophoridi). Boll. Soc. Pal. Ital. 3, 172–181 (1964).Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, A. G., and R. E. Garrison: Carbonate lithification on the sea floor. J. Geol. (1967) (In press).Google Scholar
  9. Flügel, E.: Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an mikritischen Kalken. Geol. Rundschau 56, 341–358 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. H. E. Franz: (1) Elektronenmikroskopischer Nachweis von Coccolithen im Solnhofener Plattenkalk (Ober-Jura). Neues Jahrb. Geol. u. Paläontol. Abhandl. 127, 245–263 (1967).Google Scholar
  11. H. E. Franz: (2) Über die lithogenetische Bedeutung von Coccolithen in Malmkalken des Flachwasserbereiches. Eclogae geol. Helv. 60, 1–17 (1967).Google Scholar
  12. Flügel, H., u. A. Fenninger: Die Lithogenese der Oberalmer Schichten und der mikritischen Plassen-Kalke (Tithonium), Nördliche Kalkalpen. Neues Jahrb. Geol. u. Paläontol. Abhandl. 123, 249–280 (1966).Google Scholar
  13. Folk, R. L.: Some aspects of recrystallization in ancient limestones. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Spec. Publ. 13, 14–38 (1965).Google Scholar
  14. Folk, R. L.: and Ward: Brazos River bar, a study in the significance of grain-size parameters. J. Sediment. Petrol. 27, 3–27 (1957).Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, G. M.: On sorting, sorting coefficients, and the lognormality of the grain-size distribution of sandstones. J. Geol. 70, 737–753 (1962).Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, G. M.: Terminology of crystallization textures and fabrics in sedimentary rocks. J. Sediment. Petrol. 35, 643–655 (1965).Google Scholar
  17. Frost, J. G.: A negative replication for electron microscopy study of carbonates. J. Sediment. Petrol. 37, 692–695 (1967).Google Scholar
  18. chtbauer, H.: Fazies, Porosität und Gasinhalt der Karbonatgesteine des norddeutschen Zechsteins. Z. deut. geol. Ges. 114, 484–531 (1964).Google Scholar
  19. Garrison, R. E.: Electron microscopy of Franciscan Pelagic Limestones, California. Geol. Soc. Am., Ann. Meetings Program 1966, San Francisco, 75–76 (1966).Google Scholar
  20. Garrison, R. E.: Pelagic limestones of the Oberalm beds (Upper Jurassic Lower Cretaceous), Austrian Alps. Bull. Canadian Petrol. Geol. 15, 21–49 (1967).Google Scholar
  21. Grunau, H. R.: and E. H. Bailey: Electron microscopy of limestones in the Franciscan formation of California. U.S. Geol. Survey Profess. Papers 575-B, B 94—B 100 (1967).Google Scholar
  22. Gregoire, Ch., et CL. Monty: Observation au microscope électronique sur le calcaire à pâte fine entrant dans la constitution des structures stromatolithiques du Viséen Moyen de la Belgique. Ann. soc. géol. Belg. 10, 389–397 (1963).Google Scholar
  23. Grunau, H. R.: Mikrofazies und Schichtung ausgewählter jungmesozoischer, Radiolaritführender Sedimentserien der Zentralalpen mit Berücksichtigung elektronenmikroskopischer und chemischer Untersuchungsmethoden. Intern. Sediment. Petrogr. Ser. 4, 179 p. Leiden: E. J. Brill 1959.Google Scholar
  24. H. Studer: Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Bianconekalken des Südtessins. Experientia 12, 141–150 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. G Ygi, R.: Zur Stratigraphie der Oxford-Stufe (untere Malm-Serie) der Nordschweiz und des süddeutschen Grenzgebietes. Diss., Univ. Zürich 1967.Google Scholar
  26. Hancock, J. M., and W. J. Kennedy: Demonstration: Photographs of hard and soft chalksGoogle Scholar
  27. taken with a scanning electron microscope. Geol. Soc. London 136, 2. (1967).Google Scholar
  28. Hathaway, J. C., and E. C. Robertson: Microtexture of artificially consolidated aragonite mud. U.S. Geol. Survey Profess. Papers 424-C, 301–304 (1961).Google Scholar
  29. Harvey, R. D.: Electron microscope study of microtexture and grain surfaces in limestones. Illinois State Geol. Survey 404, 1–18 (1966).Google Scholar
  30. HoNjo, S., and A. G. Fischer: Fossil coccoliths in limestones examined by electron microscopy. Science, 144, No. 1620, 837–839 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. HoNjo, S.Paleontological investigation of limestones by electron microscope. In: KUMMEL, B., and D. Raut: Handbook of Paleontological Techniques, p. 326–334, San Francisco—London: Freeman 1965.Google Scholar
  32. Illing, L. V., A. J. Wells, and C. M. Taylor: Penecontemporary dolomite in the Persian Gulf. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Spec. Publ. 13, 89–111 (1965).Google Scholar
  33. Jones, R. J.: Aspects of the biological weathering of limestone pavement. Proc. Geologists Ass. (Engl.) 76, 421–434 (1965).Google Scholar
  34. Kabelac, F.: Beiträge zur Kenntnis und Entstehung des unteren Weißjuras am Ostrand des südlichen Oberrheingrabens. Ber. naturforsch. Ges. Freiburg Breisgau 45, 5–57 (1955).Google Scholar
  35. Kahle, CH.: Aspects of diagenesis in oolithic limestones. Program 1964. Ann. Meet., Miami Beach, Geol. Soc. America, p. 106.Google Scholar
  36. Kahle, CH. F., and M. D. Turner: A rapid method of making replicas of rock and minerals surfaces for use in electron microscopy. J. Sediment. Petrol. 34, 604–609 (1964).Google Scholar
  37. Krumbein, W. C., and L. L. SLOss: Stratigraphy and Sedimentation, 2nd Ed., 660 p., San Francisco and London: W. H. Freeman and Company 1963.Google Scholar
  38. Minato, M., M. ISHII, and S. HoNJo: Electron microscopic study of oil bearing calcilutite, Khafji Oil Field, Neutral Zone. Proc. VIIth World Petrol. Congress, 2, No. 3, 447–456 (1967).Google Scholar
  39. Pfefferkorn, G.: Untersuchungen zum Realbau von Kalkspat. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Geol. Abhandl. 84, 281–326 (1952).Google Scholar
  40. Pittman, J. S., JR.: Silica in Edwards Limestone, Travis County, Texas. Spec. Publ. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min. 7, 121–134 (1959).Google Scholar
  41. Seeliger, R.: Übermikroskopische Darstellung dichter Gesteine mit Hilfe von Oberflächenabdrücken. Geol. Rundschau 45, 332–336 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shoji, R.: Electron-Microscopic Study of Limestones. J. Geol. Soc. Japan 70, 154–169 (1964) (Japan. with English summary).Google Scholar
  43. R. L. Folk: Surface morphology of some limestone types as revealed by electron microscopy. J. Sediment. Petrol. 34, 144–155 (1964).Google Scholar
  44. Studer, H. P.: Electron microscope study of aragonite crystals in marine sediments. Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol., Meeting Program, 1963, 54 (1963).Google Scholar
  45. Taylor, J. M.: Pore-space reduction in sandstones. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geologists 34, 701–716 (1950).Google Scholar
  46. Teichert, C.: Devonian rocks and paleogeography of Central Arizona. U.S. Geol. Survey Profess. Papers 464, 181 p. (1965).Google Scholar
  47. Temmler, H.: Über die Schiefer-und Plattenkalke des Weißen Jura der Schwäbischen Alb (Württemberg). Arb. Geol. Paläont. Inst. TH Stuttgart, N.F. 43, 106 p. (1964).Google Scholar
  48. Usdowski, H.-E.: Die Genese von Dolomit in Sedimenten. Mineralogie und Petrographie in Einzeldarstellungen 4, 95 p. (1967).Google Scholar
  49. Wolf, K. IL, A. J. Easron, and S. Warne: Examination and analysis of sedimentary carbonates. In: Chillingar, G. V., J. J. Bissell, and R. W. Fairbridge, Carbonate Rocks, Dev. Sedimentology, 9b, 253–341. Amsterdam• Elsevier 1967.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Flügel
  • Helmut E. Franz
  • Wilhelm F. Ott
    • 1
  1. 1.Geologisch-Paläontologisches InstitutTechnische Hochschule DarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations