Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics
This note seeks to survey crucial issues and to pinpoint difficulties in the current controversy over the meaning of measurement  and its proper mathematical description in quantum physics. It deals primarily with those philosophic and mathematical considerations which arise from the statistical nature of the results of physical measurements. The first part reviews and aims to clarify matters of more or less general interest; the second and third are devoted to some specific recent results concerning joint probabilities and phase-space distribution functions.
KeywordsCovariance Assure Posit Ghost Concession
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- [1b]Durand, III. L.: Phü. Sci. 27, (2) (1960).Google Scholar
- [1c]Heisenberg, W.: La nature dans la physique contemporaine. Paris: Gallimard 1962;Google Scholar
- [1d]Heisenberg, W.: Trad, de „Das Naturbild der heutigen Physik“. Hamburg: Rowolt 1955.Google Scholar
- [1l]An excellent, fully documented historical treatment of views here discussed is found in Max Jammer, The conceptual development of the quantum theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1966.Google Scholar
- [1m]Wigner, E. P.: The contemporary scene is well surveyed by Bernard d’Espagnat, Conceptions de la Physique Contemporaine. Paris: Herman 1965.Google Scholar
- Heisenberg, W.: Physics and philosophy. Harper 1958.Google Scholar
- Margenau, H.: The nature of physical reality. Ref. 3, chap. 13. Further discussion of the objectivity problem may be found. In: H. Margenau and J. Park: Objectivity in quantum mechanics. In: M. Bunge, ed.: Delaware Seminar in the Foundations of Physics. New York: Springer 1967.Google Scholar
- Jeffreys, H.: Scientific inference. New York: McMillan 1931.Google Scholar
- Cohen, L.: Thesis Yale University 1966, University Microfilm, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar