Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics

  • Henry Margenau
  • Leon Cohen
Part of the Studies in the Foundations Methodology and Philosophy of Science book series (FOUNDATION, volume 2)

Abstract

This note seeks to survey crucial issues and to pinpoint difficulties in the current controversy over the meaning of measurement [2] and its proper mathematical description in quantum physics. It deals primarily with those philosophic and mathematical considerations which arise from the statistical nature of the results of physical measurements. The first part reviews and aims to clarify matters of more or less general interest; the second and third are devoted to some specific recent results concerning joint probabilities and phase-space distribution functions.

Keywords

Covariance Assure Posit Ghost Concession 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Albertsen, J.: Phys. Rev. 129, 940 (1963).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [1a]
    Araki, H., and M. Yanasee: Phys. Rev. 120, 622 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [1b]
    Durand, III. L.: Phü. Sci. 27, (2) (1960).Google Scholar
  4. [1c]
    Heisenberg, W.: La nature dans la physique contemporaine. Paris: Gallimard 1962;Google Scholar
  5. [1d]
    Heisenberg, W.: Trad, de „Das Naturbild der heutigen Physik“. Hamburg: Rowolt 1955.Google Scholar
  6. [1e]
    Jauch, J. M.: Helv. Phys. Acta 33, 711 (1960).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [1f]
    Jauch, J. M., and G. Piron: Helv. Phys. Acta 36, 827 (1963).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [1g]
    Lande, A.: Phys. Rev. 108, 891 (1957).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [1h]
    Schilpp, P. (ed.): Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Evanston: Library of Living Philosophers 1949MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [1i]
    Shimony, A.: Am. J. Phys. 31, 755 (1963).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [1j]
    Tisza, L.: Revs. Mod. Phys. 35, 151 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [1k]
    Wigner, E. P.: Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [1l]
    An excellent, fully documented historical treatment of views here discussed is found in Max Jammer, The conceptual development of the quantum theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1966.Google Scholar
  14. [1m]
    Wigner, E. P.: The contemporary scene is well surveyed by Bernard d’Espagnat, Conceptions de la Physique Contemporaine. Paris: Herman 1965.Google Scholar
  15. [2]
    Heisenberg, W.: Physics and philosophy. Harper 1958.Google Scholar
  16. [3]
    Margenau, H.: The nature of physical reality, p. 171 et seq. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1950.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [4]
    Margenau, H.: Phil. Sci. 30, 1, 138 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [5]
    Margenau, H.: The nature of physical reality. Ref. 3, chap. 13. Further discussion of the objectivity problem may be found. In: H. Margenau and J. Park: Objectivity in quantum mechanics. In: M. Bunge, ed.: Delaware Seminar in the Foundations of Physics. New York: Springer 1967.Google Scholar
  19. [6]
    Jeffreys, H.: Scientific inference. New York: McMillan 1931.Google Scholar
  20. [7]
    Margenau, H.: Ann. of Phys. 23, 469 (1963).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [8]
    Margenau, H., and R. N. Hill: Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 26, 722 (1961).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [9]
    Wigner, E.: Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [10]
    Cohen, L.: J. Math. Phys. 7, 781 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [11]
    Cohen, L.: Thesis Yale University 1966, University Microfilm, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  25. [12]
    Groenewold, H. J.: Physica 12, 405 (1946).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Margenau
    • 1
  • Leon Cohen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Hunter College of the City University of New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations