Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selektion bei Autogamen

  • Chapter
Quantitative Genetik

  • 33 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Bei der Entwicklung der Kulturpflanzen hat offenbar Massenselektion eine bedeutende Rolle gespielt. Hierunter versteht man Formen von Selektion, bei der die Samen der nach gewissen Gesichtspunkten ausgelesenen Pflanzen als Mischung ausgesät werden. Für autogame Gewächse spielt diese Methode heutzutage höchstens eine untergeordnete Rolle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Atkins, R. E., and H. C. Murphy: Evaluation of yield potentialities of oat crosses from bulk hybrid tests. Agronomy J. 41, 41–45 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, B. G., and C. R. Weber: Heritable and nonheritable relationships and variability of agronomic characters in successive generations of soybean crosses. Agronomy J. 44, 487–493 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjaanes, M.: Undersökelser i vårkveiteforedling. Forskning og Forsök i Landbruket: 84–139 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borlaug, N. F.: The use of multilineal or composite varieties to control airborne epidemic diseases of self-pollinated crop plants. Proc. 1st int. Wheat Genet. Symp. p. 12–27 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, J. C., and D. S. Falconer: Inbreeding depression and heterosis of litter size in mice. Genet. Res. 1, 262–274 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, F. N., and R. W. Allard: The current status of the backcross method of plant-breeding. Agronomy J. 45, 131–138 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brim, C. A., H. W. Johnson, and C. C. Cockerham: Multiple selection criteria in soybeans. Agronomy J. 51, 42–46 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, J. C.: Use of variation or replications in breeding work. Euphytica 7, 111–118 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dros, J.: The creation and maintenance of two spring barley varieties. Euphytica 6, 45–48 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O. H.: Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 20, 157 (1955). Discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. J.: Inheritance and heritability of heading date in barley. Agronomy J. 46, 226–228 (1954 a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. J.: The use of F 2-lines in predicting the performance of F 3-selections in two barley crosses. Agronomy J. 46, 541–544 (1954 b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. J., and T. Horner: Comparison of actual and predicted gains in barley selection experiments. Agronomy J. 47, 186–189 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. J., and T. Horner: Heritability in standard units. Agronomy J. 49, 59–62 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N.: Polygene analysis. Genet. Res. 2, 96–105 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, E. C., and J. S. Rogers: Evaluating corn inbreds and hybrids by means of planting dates. Agronomy J. 51, 139–143 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsline, G. W.: A graphical „regression selection“ technique for maturity-related characters in field corn. Agronomy J. 52, 581–584 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, H. V., M. L. Martini, and H. Stevens: A study of methods in barley breeding. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 720 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J. R.: Distribution and utilization of natural variability in cultivated plants. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 9, 191–208 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J. B.: Canad. J. Res., C 18, 578–584 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazel, L. N., and J. L. Lush: The efficiency of three methods of selection. J. Hered. 33, 393–399 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, J., and G. A. Baker: Stability of variety response to extensive variations of environment and field plot design. Hilgardia 30, 365–394 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. F., and P. C. Mangelsdorf: The improvement of naturally cross-pollinated plants by selection in self-fertilized lines. I. The production of inbred strains of corn. Conn. Agr. exp. St. Bull. 266, 347–418 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. R., and K. J. Frey: Heritability percentages and degrees of dominance for quantitative characters in oats. Iowa St. J. Sci. 35, 49–58 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jugenheimer, R. W.: Hybrid maize breeding and seed production. FAO Agricultural development paper No. 62, p. 94 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, R. C.: An experimental study of quantitative inheritance in cotton. Indian. J. Genet. Plant Breed. 19, 134–149 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L.: The theory and application of the backcross technique in cotton breeding. J. Genet. 47, 76–86 (1945).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laube, W.: Petkus. Mitt. Landwirtsch. 51, 934–936 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, F. G. H., and R. N. H. Whitehouse: Studies on the breeding of self-pollinated cereals. Euphytica 6, 169–184 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lush, J. L.: Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animals. Proc. 8th int. Congr. Genet. 356–375 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Key, J.: The breeding of oats. In: Roemer und Rudorf: Handb. Pflanzenz. 2, 512 bis 517 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud, I., and H. H. Cramer: Segregation for yield, hight and maturity following a soybean cross. Agronomy J. 43, 605–609 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, H. L.: Response to selection for yield in cotton. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 20, 103–110 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. I. H., and J. W. Lambert: A comparison of F 3-lines and their related F 6-lines in two barley crosses. Crop Sci. 1, 246–249 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. P.: Progressive improvement in self-fertilized crops. Heredity 7, 127–129 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, F. D.: Isolating better foundation inbreds for use in corn hybrids. Genetics. 30, 455–471 (1945).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rinke, E. H.: Breeding for yield components in maize. Eucarpia, 1st Meeting of Maize section, FAO, Rome, p. 13–14 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. F., R. E. Comstock, and P. H. Harvey: Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in corn. Agronomy J. 41, 353–359 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, Kan-Ichi: Competition in plants and its relation to selection. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 20, 137–157 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seyffert, W.: Untersuchungen über die Vererbung quantitativer Charaktere an Arabidopsis thaliana (L) Heynh. Z. Pflanzenz. 42, 356–401 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, S. M., K. B. L. Jain, and K. S. Parmar: Evaluation of the potentialities of wheat crosses based on mean parental and early generation values. Indian J. Genet. Plant. Breed. 19, 150–170 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suneson, C. A., and H. Stevens: Studies with bulked hybrid populations of barley. U.S. Dept. Agr. Techn. Bull. No. 1067 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suneson, C. A.: An evolutionary plant breeding method. Agronomy J. 48, 188–191 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. H., and R. E. Atkins: Effect of natural selection in segregating generations upon bulk populations in barley. Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci. 29, 147–162 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M.: Back crossing. The theory and practice of the backcross method in the breeding of some non-cereal crops. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, England (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrie, J. H.: A comparison of the pedigree and bulk methods of breeding soybeans. Agronomy J. 50, 198–200 (1958 a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrie, J. H.: Comparison of different generations of soybean crosses grown in bulk. Agronomy J. 50, 265–267 (1958 b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, R. L., and C. R. Weber: Effectiveness of selection method for yield in soybean crosses. Agronomy J. 52, 527–530 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J. N.: A method of estimating heritability. Agronomy Journ. 44, 427–430 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. R., and B. R. Moorthy: Heritable and non heritable relationships and variability of oil content and agronomic characters in the F 2 generation of soybean crosses. Agronomy J. 44, 202–209 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wienhues, F.: Weizenzüchtung in Europa. In: Roemer und Rudorf: Handb. Pflanzenz. 2, 216–275 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Gunnar Eilert Hiorth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1963 Springer-Verlag OHG / Berlin · Göttingen · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hiorth, G.E. (1963). Selektion bei Autogamen. In: Quantitative Genetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88018-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88018-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-48460-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-88018-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation