Estimation and Testing of a Combined Network Equilibrium Model of Travel Choices for the Chicago Region

  • David E. Boyce
  • Yufang Zhang


Traditionally, the travel forecasting process has been viewed as a sequence of travel forecasts beginning with trip origin and destination frequencies followed by origin — destination choice, mode choice and then route choice. Consideration of each of these choices separately has led to the development of different models representing each dimension of the tripmaker’s choice process. The actual travel forecast, then, results from solving a sequence of separate models which have come to be known as trip generation, trip distribution, mode split and trip assignment.


Combine Model Route Choice Generalize Cost Cost Coefficient Trip Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anas, A., 1983, Discrete Choice Theory, Information Theory and the Multinomial hogii and Gravity Models, Transportation Research 17B, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
  2. Beckmann, M., C.B. McGuire and C.B. Winsten, 1956, Studies in the Economics of Transportation, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Akiva, M. and S.R. Lerman, 1985, Discrete Choice Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Boyce, D.E., 1980, A Framework for Constructing Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Location, Transportation Science 14, pp. 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyce, D.E., 1990, Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Location and Travel Choices: A New Research Agenda, New Frontiers in Regional Science, M. Chatterji and R.E. Kuenne (eds.), New York University Press, New York, pp. 238–256.Google Scholar
  6. Boyce, D.E., 1984, Network Models in Transprtation/Land Use Planning, in Transportation Planning Models, M. Florian (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 475–498.Google Scholar
  7. Boyce, D.E., K.S. Chon, M.E. Ferris, Y.J. Lee, K.T. Lin and R.W. Eash, 1985, Implementation and Evaluation of Combined Models of Urban Travel and Location on a Sketch Planning Network, Chicago Area Transportation Study, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Boyce, D.E., L.J. LeBlanc and K.S. Chon, 1988, Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Location and Travel Choices: A Retrospective Survey, Journal of Regional Science 28, pp. 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyce, D.E., and L. Lundqvist, 1987, Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Location and Travel Choices: Alternative Formulations for the Stockholm Region, Papers of the Regional Science Association 61, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
  10. Boyce, D.E. and A. Sen, 1990, Estimation Procedures for Transportation Network Equilibrium Models, in Infrastructure and the Space-Economy, K. Peschel (ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyce, D.E., M. Tatineni and Y. Zhang, 1992, Scenario Analyses for the Chicago Region with a Sketch Planning Model of Origin-Destination, Mode and Route Choice, Final Report to Illinois Department of Transportation, Urban Transportation Center, University of Illinois, Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Bruynooghe, M., A. Gilbert and M. Sakarovitch, 1969, Une Méthode d’Affectation du Trafic, in Beiträge zur Theorie des Verkehrsflusses, P. Leutzbach and P. Baron (eds.), Strassenbau und Strassenverkehrstechnik 86, pp. 198–204.Google Scholar
  13. Chicago Area Transportation Study, 1990, 2010 Transportation System Development Plan, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Chon, K.S., 1982, Testing of Combined Urban Location and Travel Choice Models, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  15. Dafermos, S.C., 1968, Traffic Assignment and Resource Allocation in Transportation Networks, Ph.D. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  16. Domencick, T. and D. McFadden, 1975, Urban Travel Demand, A Behavioral Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Erlander, S., 1977, Accessibility, Entropy and the Distribution and Assignment of Traffic, Transportation Research 12, pp. 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans, S.P., 1973, Some Applications of Optimisation Theories in Transport Planning, Ph.D. dissertation, University College London, London.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, S.P., 1976, Derivation and Analysis of Some Models for Combining Trip Distribution and Assignment, Transportation Research 10, pp. 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Florian, M., R. Chapleau, S. Nguyen, C. Achim, L. James-Lefebvre, S. Galarneau, J. Lefebvre and C. Fisk, 1979, Validation and Application of EMME: An Equilibrium Based Two-Mode Transportation Planning Method, Transportation Research Record 728, pp. 14–22.Google Scholar
  21. LeBlanc, L.J., 1973, Mathematical Programming Algorithms for Large Scale Network Equilibrium and Network Design Problems, Ph.D. dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, Y.J., 1985, Methods for Implementing Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Location and Travel Choice, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, C.K., 1987, Implementation and Evaluation of Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Residential Location and Travel Choices, Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Campaign.Google Scholar
  24. Murchland, J.D., 1966, Some Remarks on the Gravity Model of Traffic Distribution and an Equivalent Maximisation Formulation, Transport Network Theory Unit, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
  25. Sen, A. and Z. Matsuzewski, 1991, Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Gravity Model Parameters, Journal of Regional Science 31, pp. 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wardrop, J.G., 1952, Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part II, 1, pp. 325–378.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Boyce
  • Yufang Zhang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations