Skip to main content

Some Extensions of Interregional Input-Output Analysis

  • Chapter
Potentials and Bottlenecks in Spatial Development
  • 43 Accesses

Abstract

The application of input-output models has ranged from simple impact studies of the effects of new firms and/or new enterprises to more complex studies involving projections of future levels of activity in a certain regional economy. The main purpose of this paper is to show how to make use of the conventional input-output framework in an effective way so as to evaluate the changes in spatial interaction due to the recent improvement of transport infrastructure in Japan. The theme of our primary concern has been always taken to examine input-output models at the regional level. As a result, how to measure interregional feedback effects turns out to be one of the crucial subjects of our study. Based on nonsurvey and/or partial-survey methods for estimating input-output information at the regional level, we will show new direction of analytical devices together with some empirical fact-finding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Batten, D. F., and D. E. Boyce, 1986, Spatial Interaction, Transportation, and Interregional Commodity Flow Models, in P. Nijkamp (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. E., R. W. Jackson and G. R. West, 1990, The Construction and Use of Regional Input-Output Models: Editors’ Introduction to the Special Issue, International Regional Science Review, Vol.13, Nos.1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourque, P. J., and M. Cox, 1970, An Inventory of Regional Input-Output Studies in the United States, University of Washington, Graduate School of Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giarratani, F., J. D. Maddy and C. F. Socher, 1976, Regional and Interregional Input-Output Analysis: An Annotated Bibliography, West Virginia University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G. J. D., and R. C. Jensen, 1986, Regional, Interregional andMultiregional Input-Ouput Analysis, in P. Nijkamp (ed.). Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, W. Z., 1959, Interindustry Relations of a Metropolitan Area, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.41, No.4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihara, T., H. Shishido and K. Tokuoka, 1989, Impact Studies of Transport Infrastructures — A Case Study of the Seto Ohashi Bridge -, Working Paper Series, No. 4, The Institute of Economic Research, Kagawa University, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihara, T., H. Shishido and K. Tokuoka, 1991, Impacts of Transport Infrastructure on Regional Economies — Case Studies of the Seto Ohashi Bridge, Working Paper Series, No.6, The Institute of Economic Research, Kagawa University, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W., 1951, Interregional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Model of a Space Economy, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.33, No.4, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. and R. E. Kuenne, 1953, The Impact of Steel upon the Greater New York-Philadelphia Industrial Region, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 35, No. 4, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W., et al., 1960, Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science, The Technology Press of MIT and John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japanese Government, Administrative Management Agency, et al., 1964, The 1960 Input-Output Table of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japanese Government, Administrative Management Agency, et al., 1969, The 1965 Input-Output Table of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japanese Government, Administrative Management Agency, et al., 1974, The 1970 Input-Output Table of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. C., 1980, The Concept of Accuracy in Regional Input-Output Models, International Regional Science Review, Vol.5, No.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashima, S., 1989, Estimation of Domestic Freight Volume Using Input-Output Table, Doboku Keikakugaku Kenkyu (Infrastructure Planning), No. 12, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W., 1936, Quantitative Input-Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.18, No.3, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W., 1941, The Structure of American Economy: 1919–1929, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMenamin, D. G. and J. E. Haring, 1974, An Appraisal of Nonsurvey Techniques for Estimating Regional Input-Output Models, Journal of Regional Science, Vol.14, No.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E., 1957, The Impact of the Aluminum Industry on the Pacific Northwest: A Regional Input-Output Analysis, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.39, No.2, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E., 1966, Interregional Feedback Effects in Input-Output ModelsrSome Preliminary Results, Papers, Regional Science Association, Vol.17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E., 1969, Interregional Feedbacks in Input-Output Models: Some Experimental Results, Western Economic Journal, Vol.7, No.1, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E. and P. D. Blair, 1985, Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F. T. and J. W. Petersen, 1955, Regional Analysis: An Interindustry Model of Utah, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.37, No.4, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven, J., 1981, Interregional Input-Output Analysis and Dutch Regional Policy Problems, Gower Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R., M. McGovem and J. Morison, 1990, A Microeconomic Input-Output Analysis of Regional Economic Instability, International Regional Science Review, Vol.13, Nos. l and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. and R. C. Jensen, 1984, A System for Generation of Small-Economy Input-Output Tables in A. D. Sorensen, R. A. Powell and H. Weinand (eds.). Papers of the Eighth Meeting of the Australia and New Zealand Section of the Regional Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • St.Louis, L. V., 1989, Empirical Tests of Some Semi-survey Update Procedures Applied to Rectangular Input-Output Tables, Journal of Regional Science, Vol.29, No.3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ihara, T. (1993). Some Extensions of Interregional Input-Output Analysis. In: Kohno, H., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Potentials and Bottlenecks in Spatial Development. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87901-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87901-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-87903-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-87901-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics