Advertisement

The Dynamics of Host-Parasitoid Interactions with Heterogeneity Host Density Dependence and Variable Sex Ratios

  • Michael P. Hassell
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Biomathematics book series (LNBM, volume 52)

Abstract

Ever since the early work of Thompson (1924), Nicholson (1933) and Nicholson and Bailey (1935), there has been a tradition of modelling predator-prey interactions in discrete time that has run parallel with the considerable literature using differential equations following Lotka (1925) and Volterra (1926).

Keywords

Functional Response Density Dependence Host Density Mutual Interference Host Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beddington, J.R. (1975): Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, Journal of Animal Ecology 44: 331–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beddington, J.R., C.A. Free, and J.H. Lawton (1975): Dynamic complexity in predator- prey models framed in difference equations, Nature, Lond., 225: 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beddington, J.R., C.A. Free, and J.H. Lawton (1978): Modelling biological control: on the characteristics of successful natural enemies, Nature, Lond., 273: 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellows, T.S. (1979): The modelling of competition and parasitism in laboratory insect populations, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  5. Callan, E.Mc.C. (1944): A note on Phanuropis semiflaviventris Girault (Hym., Scelionidae), an egg-parasite of cacao stink-bugs, Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London (A), 19: 48–49.Google Scholar
  6. Comins, H.N., and M.P. Hassell (1979): The dynamics of optimally foraging predators and parasitoids, Journal of Animal Ecology, 48: 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flanders, S.E. (1939): Environmental control of sex in hymenopterous insects, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 32: 11–26.Google Scholar
  8. Free, C.A., J.R. Beddington, and J.H. Lawton (1977): On the inadequacy of simple models of mutual interference for parasitism and predation, Journal of Animal Ecology, 46: 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamilton, W.D. (1971): Geometry for the selfish herd, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31: 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hassell, M.P. (1968): The behavioural response of a tachinid fly (Cyzenis aZbicans (Fall.)) to its host, the winter moth, (Operophtera brumata (L.)). Journal of Animal Ecology, 37: 627–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassell, M.P. (1978): The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Hassell, M.P. (1980): Foraging strategies, population models and biological control: a case study. Journal of Animal Ecology, 49: 603–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hassell, M.P. (1982): Patterns of parasitism in patchy environments, Ecological Entomology, 7: (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Hassell, M.P., and R.M. Anderson (1983): Host susceptibility: a component of heterogeneity in insect host-parasitoid models, (manuscript).Google Scholar
  15. Hassell, M.P., and R.M. May (1973): Stability in insect host-parasite models, Journal of Animal Ecology, 42: 693–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ): Aggregation in predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability, Journal of Animal Ecology, 43: 567–594.Google Scholar
  17. Hassell, M.P., and G.C. Varley (1969): A new inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control, Nature, Lond., 223: 1133–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hassell, M.P., J.K. Waage, and R.M. May (1983): Variable parasitoid sex ratios and their effect on host-parasitoid dynamics (manuscript).Google Scholar
  19. Heads, P.A., and J.H. Lawton (1982): Studies on the natural enemy complex of the holly leaf miner: the effects of scale on aggregation responses and the implications for biological control, Oikos (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Holling, C.S. (1959): Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism, Canadian Entomologist, 91: 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kochetova, N.I. (1978): Factors determining the sex ratio in some entomophagous Hymenoptera, Entomological Reviews, 60: 1–5.Google Scholar
  22. Lotka, A.J. (1925): Elements of Physical Biology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. (Reissued as Elements of Mathematical Biology by Dover, 1956 ).Google Scholar
  23. May, R.M. (1976): Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics, Nature, Lond., 261: 459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. May, R.M. (1978): Host-parasitoid systems in patch environments: a phenomenological model, Journal of Animal Ecology, 47: 833–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. May, R.M., M.P. Hassell, R.M. Anderson, and D.W. Tonkyn (1981): Density dependence in host-parasitoid models, Journal of Animal Ecology, 50: 855–865.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McClure, M.S. (1977): Parasitism of the scale insect, Fiorinia externa (Homoptera: Diaspididae), by Aspidiotiphagus citrinus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in a hemlock forest: density dependence. Environmental Entomology, 6: 551–555.Google Scholar
  27. Nicholson, A.J. (1933): The balance of animal populations, Journal of Animal Ecology, 2: 132–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicholson, A.J., and V.A. Bailey (1935): The balance of animal populations, Part I, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1935: 551–598.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, D.J. (1970): Aspects of host-parasite interactions in laboratory populations of insects, Unpublished D. Phil. Thesis, Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Rogers, D.J., and M.P. Hassell (1974): General models for insect parasite and predator searching behaviour: interference, Journal of Animal Ecology, 43: 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharov, A.A. (1979): Effect of spatial structure of the interacting populations of Neodiprion sertifer and its parasite Exenterus abruptorius on the dynamics of their numbers, Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 58: 356–365 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, W.R. (1924): La théorie mathématique de l’action des parasites entomophages et le facteur du hasard, Annls. Fac. Sci. Marseille, 2: 69–89.Google Scholar
  33. Viktorov, G.A. (1976): The Ecology of Entomophagous Parasites, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Nanka. ( Russian).Google Scholar
  34. Volterra, V. (1926): Variazioni e fluttnazioni del numero d’individui in specie animali conviventir, Mem. Acad. Lincei., 2:31–113. (Translation in: Chapman, R.N. 1931. Animal Ecology, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 409–448.)Google Scholar
  35. Waage, J.K. (1982): Sib-mating and sex ratio strategies in scelionid wasps, Ecological Entomology, 7: 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walker, I. (1967): Effect of population density on the viability and fecundity of Nasonia vitripennis Walker (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae), Ecology, 48: 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, Y.H., and A.P. Gutierrez (1980): An assessment of the use of stability analyses in population ecology, Journal of Animal Ecology, 49: 435–452.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watt, K.E.F. (1959): A mathematical model for the effect of densities of attacked and attacking species on the number attacked, Canadian Entomologist, 91: 129144.Google Scholar
  39. Wellington, W.G. (1957): Individual difference as a factor in population dynamics: The development of a problem, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 35: 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilkes, A. (1963): Environmental causes of variation in the sex ratio of an arrhenotokous insect, Dahlbominus fuliginosus (Nees) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), Canadian Entomologist, 95: 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wylie, H.J. (1965): Some factors that reduce the reproductive rate of Nasonia vitripennis at high adult population densities, Canadian Entomologist, 97: 970–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael P. Hassell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations