Factors in the Energy Budget of Mountain Hummingbirds

  • William A. CalderIII
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 12)

Abstract

The abundant flowers of a compressed summer in the mountains provide an energy resource for exploitation by hummingbirds. However, the cold nights constitute a liability in their total energy budget. Adiabatic cooling, clear dry air, and the heat sink of the cold sky result in chilling conditions for the incubation of eggs by a tiny hummingbird. Howell and Dawson (1954) recorded the ability of the Anna’s hummingbird (Archilochus anna) to maintain homeothermy while incubating overnight. I was greatly impressed the first time that I saw an even smaller calliope hummingbird (Stellula calliope) incubating her eggs in the presunrise cold of Jackson Hole, Wyoming. In a later visit I was equipped to record temperatures from two calliope nests. They also maintained homeothermy all night, despite the colder climate (Calder, 1971), stimulating my interest in heat-exchange principles and problems. It was obvious that ornithologists had given little consideration to physical factors in bird behavior, and that further study of hummingbird nesting would be rewarding. The population of broad-tailed hummingbirds (Selasphorus platycercus) at Gothic, Colorado, has been ideal for this. Evidence of the marginal energetic situation for this population may be seen in the occasional recourse to hypothermia during incubation (Calder and Booser, 1973) and the abandonment of live, normal chicks at some late nests when the flower supply declines, simultaneous with influx of competing migrant hummingbirds, in late July and early August (Calder, 1973d). Thus energy conservation in thermoregulation is of major importance.

Keywords

Total Heat Dition Emissivity Populus Ornithol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aschoff, J, Pohl, H.: 1970a. Rhythmic variations in energy metabolism. Federation Proc. 29, 1541–1552.Google Scholar
  2. Aschoff, J, Pohl, H.: 1970b. Der Ruheumsatz von Vögeln als Funktion der Tageszeit und der Körpergrösse. J. Ornithol. 111, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calder, W. A.: 1971. Temperature relationships and nesting of the calliope hummingbird. Condor 73, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calder, W. A.: 1973a. The consequences of body size for avian energetics. In Avian energetic (ed. R. A. Paynter, Jr.). Cambridge, Mass.: Nuttall Ornith. Club, (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Calder, W. A.: 1973b. An estimate of the heat balance of a nesting hummingbird in a chilling climate. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 46A, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calder, W. A.: 1973c. Microhabitat selection during nesting of hummingbirds in the Rocky Mountains. Ecology 54 (1), 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calder, W. A.: 1973d. The timing of maternal behavior of the broad-tailed hummingbird preceding nest failure. Wilson Bull. 85, 283–290.Google Scholar
  8. Calder, W. A., Booser, J.: 1973. Hypothermia of broad-tailed hummingbirds during incubation in nature with ecological correlations. Science 180(May 18), 751–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drent, R.: 1972. Adaptive aspects of the physiology of incubation. Proc. XV Intern. Ornith. Congr., 255–280.Google Scholar
  10. Drent, R.: 1973. The natural history of incubation. In Breeding biology of birds (ed. D. S. Farner), pp. 262–311. Washington, D.C.: Natl. Acad. Sci.Google Scholar
  11. Hainsworth, F. R., Wolf, L. L.: 1972. Crop volume, nectar concentration, and hummingbird energetics. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 42, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howell, T. R., Dawson, W. R.: 1954. Nest temperatures and attentiveness in the Anna Hummingbird. Condor 56, 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleiber, M.: 1961. The fire of life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Lasiewski, R. E.: 1963. Oxygen consumption of torpid, resting, active and flying hummingbirds. Physiol. Zool. 36, 122–140.Google Scholar
  15. Lasiewski, R. E.: 1964. Body temperatures, heart and breathing rate, and evaporative water loss in hummingbirds. Physiol. Zool. 37, 212–223.Google Scholar
  16. Lasiewski, R. E. Dawson, W. R.: 1967. A re-examination of the relation between standard metabolic rate and body weight in birds. Condor 69, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McNab, B. K.: 1971. On the ecological significance of Bergmann’s rule. Ecology 52, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Porter, W. P., Gates, D. M.: 1969. Thermodynamic equilibria of animals with environment. Ecol. Monogr. 39, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tucker, V. A.: 1971. Flight energetics in birds. Am. Zool. 11, 115–124.Google Scholar
  20. Veghte, J. H., Herreid, C. F.: 1965. Radiometric determination of feather insulation and metabolism of Arctic birds. Physiol. Zool. 38, 267–275.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • William A. CalderIII

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations