Optimierung pp 238-240 | Cite as

Auswahl von allgemeinen OR-Veröffentlichungen

  • Kurt Littger


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Husband, T. M.: Robots, CAM and O. R., J. Res. Soc., Vol. 34, No. 4, April 1983, 303–307Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tilanus, C. B.: Failures and Successes of Quantitative Methods in Management, Eur. J. Oper. Res., Vol. 19, No. 2, 1985, 170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kerr, R. M.: Role of Operational Research in Organizational Decision Making, Eur. J. Oper. Res., Vol. 14, No. 3, 1983Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geoffrion, A. M.: Can MS/OR Evolve Fast Enough?, Interfaces, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1983Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zahedi, F.: A Survey of Issues in the MS/OR Field, Interfaces, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1984Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eilon, S.: The Role of Management Science, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1980Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ackoff, R. L.: The Future of Operational Research is Past, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 30, 1979Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ackoff, R. L.: Resurrecting the Future of Operational Research, Journ. of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 30, 1979Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall, J. R. and Hess, S. W.: O. R./M. S. Dead or Dying?, Interfaces, Vol. 8, 1978Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bevan, R. G. and Bryer, R. A.: On Measuring the Contribution of O. R., J. of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 29, 1978Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rivett, B. H. P. and Ackoff, R. L.: A Manager’s Guide to Operational Research, Wiley, New York, 1964Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myers, B. L. and Melcher, A. J.: On the Choice of Risk Levels in Managerial Decision-Making, Mgmt. Sci., Vol. 16, No. 2, 1969, 31–39Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schultz, R. L. and Slevin, P.: Implementing Operations Research/Mgmt. Science, American Elsevier Publ. Company, New York, 1975Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roessler, M.: Optimumbezogene und optimumfreie Aufgaben des Operations Research, Die Unternehmung, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1974, 73–82Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garey, M. R. and Johnson, D. S.: Computers and Intractability, Freeman, San Francisco, 1979zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edie, L. C.: The Quality and Maturity of Operations Research, Operations Research, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1973, 1024–1029MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caywood, T. E.: How Can We Improve Operations Research?, Operations Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1970, 569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ford, F. N., Bradbard, D. A., Ledbetter, W. N., and Cox, J. F.: Use of Operations Research in Production Management, Prod. Inv. Mgmt., Vol. 28, No. 3, 1987, 59–63Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Philpott, A. B.: Linear Programming Made Simpler Than Simplex, New Scientist, December 6, 1984Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ackoff, R. L.: The Development of Operations Research as a Science, Operations Research, Vol. 4, 1956, 265MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adelson, R. M. and Normann, J. M.: Operations Research and Decision-Making, Operations Research Quarterly, Vol. 20, 1969, 399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arrow, K. J.: Decision Theory and Operations Research, Operations Research, Vol. 5, 1957, 765–774MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stahlkencht, P.: Erfahrungen mit computergestützten Planungsmodellen, Angewandte Informatik, Heft 5, 1972, 209–212Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boersig, C. und Frey, D.: Widerstand und Unterstützung bei Operations Research, Verlag Kirsch, München, 1976Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trux, W.: Der Einsatz quantitativer Planungsverfahren aus der Sicht des Top-Managements, in VIII.1. 1–55, 1981Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Braun, G. E. und Pfohl, H. C.: Planungskultur/Planungsphilosophie als Grundlage für den Einsatz von Planungstechniken, in VIII.1. 1–57, 1985, 396–402Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meyer zu Selhausen, H.: Typische Rahmenbedingungen für erfolgr. OR-Aktivitäten in der Wirtschaftspraxis, in VIII.1. 1–57, 1985, 384Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stahlknecht, P.: Gibt es überhaupt noch OR in der Datenverarbeitung—Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme, in VIII.1.l-57, 1985Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Müller-Merbach, H.: Die Konstruktion von Planungsmodellen, in VIII.1. 1–57, 1985Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Duckworth, W. E.: A Guide to Operations Research, Methuen and Co., London, 1962Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Richmond, S. B.: Operations Research for Management Decisions, Ronald Press, New York, 1968Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E.: Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, Eur. J. Oper. Res., Vol. 2, 1978, 429MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thornton, P.: Expert Systems—The Challenge for OR, in VIII.1. 1–57, 1985, 278–284Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cooper, T.: OR and Decision Support Systems—The BA (British Airways) Experience, in VIII.1. 1–57, 1985, 294–300Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pfohl, H.-C.: Praktische Relevanz von Entscheidungstechniken, Die Unternehmung, Vol. 30, 1976, 73–93Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pfohl, H.-C. und Ruerup, B. (Eds.): Anwendungsprobleme moderner Planungs-und Entscheidungstechniken, Königstein/Ts., 1978Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kolata, G.: A Fast Way to Solve Hard Problems, Science, 225, 21st September 1984, No. 4668, 1379–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Economist: No so Simplex, The Economist, 17th December 1984Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Angier, N.: Folding the Perfect Corner, Time, 124, 23, 1984Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wild, W. G. Jr. and Port, O.: The Startling Discovery Bell Labs Kept in the Shadows, Business Week, September 21st, 1987Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wagner, H. M.: Operations Research—A Global Language for Business Strategy, Operations Research, Vol. 36, No. 5, 1988, 797–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rutten, W. G. M. M. and Tilanus, C. B.: International Publishing in Oper. Res., Eur. J. of Oper. Res., Vol. 33, No. 1, 1988, 114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mc Closkey, J. F.: US Operations Research—History, Oper. Res., Part I, II and III, Vol. 35, 1987, 143–152 and 453–470 and 910–925Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Corner, L. J.: Linear Programming—Some Unsuccessful Applications, OMEGA, Vol. 7, 1979, 257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Harvey, A.: Factors Making for Implementation Success and Failure, Mgmt. Sci., Vol. 16, B312–B321Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stewart, R.: How Computers Affect Mgmt., Pan Books, London, 1971Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ford, F. N., Bradbard, D. A., Cox. J. F., and Ledbetter, W. N.: Simulation in Corporate Decision Making—Then and Now, Simulation, Vol. 49, No. 6, 1987, 277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Narchal, R. M.: Simulation Model for Corporate Planning in a Steel Plant, Eur. J. of Oper. Res., Vol. 34, No. 3, 1988, 282–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Simon, H. A.: The New Science of Management Decision, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1977Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    O’Keefe, R. M.: Expert Systems and Operations Research—Mutual Benefits, J. of the Oper. Res. Soc., Vol. 36, 1985, 125–129Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    O’Keefe, R. M., Belton, V., and Ball, T.: Experiences with Using Expert Systems in O. R., J. of the Oper. Res. Soc., Vol. 37, 1986, 657–688Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Dantzig, G. B. and Tomlin, J. A.: E.M. L. Beale, FRS—Friend and Colleague, Math. Progr., Vol. 38, 1987, 117–131MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Powell, M. J. D.: A Biogr. Memoir of Evelyn Martin Lansdowne Beale, FRS, Biogr. Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Soc., Vol. 33, 1987Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hooker, J. N.: Karmarkar’s Linear Programming Algorithm, Interfaces, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1986, 75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kozlov, A.: The Karmarkar Algorithm—Is it for Real?, SIAM News, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1985, 1–4Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Miller, D. W. and Starr, M. K.: Executive Decisions and Operations, Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1960Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lockett, A. G. and Poldng, E.: Organizational Linkages and O. R. Projects, European J. Res., Vol. 7, 1981, 14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Polding, E. and Lockett, A. G.: Attitudes and Perceptions Relating to Implementation and Success in Oper. Res., J. Oper. Res. Soc., Vol. 33, 1982, 733–744Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lockett, A. G.: Self-Starters in MS/OR—A Growth Area, Interfaces, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1984, 59–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zeleny, M.: On the Squandering of Resources and Profits Via Linear Programming, Interfaces, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1981, 101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Miller, J. R. and Feldman, H.: Management Science—Theory Relevance and Practice in the 1980’s, Interfaces, Vol. 11, 1983, 56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Eilon, S.: Dilemmas in the O. R. World, OMEGA, Vol. 11, 1983, 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lockett, A. G.: Applications of Mathematical Programming—Before, Now and After, J. Oper. Res. Soc., Vol. 36, No. 5, 1985, 347–356Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wysocki, R. K.: O. R./M. S. Implementation Research—A Bibliography, Interfaces, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1979, 37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Radnor, M., Rubinstein, A. H., and Bean, A. S.: Integration and Utilization of M. S. Activities in Organizations, Oper. Res. Quart., Vol. 19, 1968, 117–141Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dantzig, G. B.: Thoughts on Linear Programming and Automation, Mgmt. Sci., Vol. 3, 1957, 131–139Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Dantzig, G. B.: On the Significance of Solving Linear Progr. Probl. with some Integer Variables, Econometrics, Vol. 28, 1960, 30–44MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Larichev, O. I.: Science and the Art of Decision Making, Nauka, Moskau, 1979Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Pidd, M.: Computer Simulation in Management Science, Wiley, New York, 1984Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bentley, C.: Computer Project Mgmt., Heyden, Philadelphia, 1982Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Geoffrion, A. M.: The Purpose of Mathematical Programming is Insight, Not Numbers, Interfaces, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1976, 81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Fortuin, L. and Zijlstra, M.: Operational Research in Practice—Experiences of an OR Group in Industry, Eur. J. Oper. Res., Vol. 41, No. 1, 1989, 108–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G.: The Future of Operations Research is Bright, Eur. J. of Oper. Res., Vol. 38, 1989, 282–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Eilon, S.: Types of OR-Workers, OMEGA, Vol. 12, 1984, 99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G. (Ed.): New Challenges for Management Research, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Fortuin, L. and Lootsma, F. A.: Future Directions in Operational Research, in IX-75, 1985, 55–80Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Powers, R. F.: Optimization Models for Logistics Decisions, J. of Business Logistics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1989, 106–121Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Powers, R. F., Karrenbauer, J. J. and Doolittle, G.: The Myth of the Simple Model, Interfaces, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1983, 84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Singh, J.: Great Ideas of Oper. Res., Dover Publ., New York, 1968Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Churchman, C. W.: Managerial Acceptance of Scientific Recommendations, California Management Review, 1964, 31–38Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Saaty, T. L.: Decision Making for Leaders, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Rev. Edition, 1986Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Saaty, T. L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Saaty, T. L.: Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mgmt. Sci., Vol. 32, No. 7, 1986Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Saaty, T. L.: Some Mathematical Topics in the Analytic Hierarchy Process, in X-259, 89–107, 1988Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Saaty, T. L.: What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process?, in X-259, 110–121, 1988Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Saaty, T. L.: Rank Generation, Preservation, and Reversal in the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Decision Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1987Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Dantzing, G. B.: Reminiscences About the Origins of Linear Programming, in VIII.1. 1–16, 1983, 79–86Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Meyer zu Selhausen, H.: Repositioning OR’s Products in the Market, Interfaces, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1989, 79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Vazsonyi, A.: Will the CEO Ever Know What MS/OR Is?, Interfaces, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1990, 77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wiseman, A.: Operational Research—A Toolkit for Effective Decision Making, Management Accounting (UK), Vol. 66, No. 11, 1988, 36Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Forgionne, G. A.: Quantitative Decision Making, Wadsworth Publ. Co., Belmont, California, 1986Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Levin, R. I., Kirkpatrick, C. A., and Rubin, D. S.: Quantitative Approaches to Management, McGraw-Hill International, 1982Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hirshfeld, D. S.: Some Thought of Math. Programming Practice in the 90’s Interfaces, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1990, 158–165Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Gass, G. I.: Model World—In the Beginning There was Linear Programming, Interfaces, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1990, 128–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt Littger
    • 1
  1. 1.MünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations