Skip to main content

Obstetrical MRI

  • Chapter
MRI of the Body
  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

Ultrasound has been used since the 1950’s to follow the progress of pregnancy. This harmless, reproducible examination has some limitations:

  • lack of precise tissue characterization

  • difficulty in the study of:

    • the mother’s deep pelvic structures in advanced pregnancy,

    • the placenta and its insertion when it is very posterior,

    • the fetus at the end of pregnancy in case of oligoamnios.

    • Moreover, its results depend much on the operator’s experience [10].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artis AA (1985) The fallacy of placental migration: effect of sonographic techniques. AJR 144: 79–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooke P, Morris PG (1981) The effect of NMR exposure on linving organism II: A genetic study of human lymphocytes. Br J Radiol 54: 622–625

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Deter RL, Hadlock FP, Harrist RB (1982) Evaluation of normal fetal growth and the detection of intrauterine retardation. In: Callen PW (ed) Ultrasonography in Obstetrical Gynecology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, pp 113–140

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eldestone DI (1970) Placental localization by ultrasound. Clin Obstet Gynecol 20: 285–296

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hricak H, Demas BE, Braga CA, Fisher MR, Winkler ML (1986) Gestational trophoblastic neoplasm of the uterus: MR assessment. Radiology 161: 11–16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson IR, Symonds EM, Worthington BS, Broughton PF, Hawkes RC, Gyngell M (1984) Imaging the pregnant human uterus with nuclear magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148: 1136–1139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koybayashi M (1970) Placental localization by ultrasond. Am J Obstet Gynecol 106: 279–285

    Google Scholar 

  8. McMarthy SM, Filly RA, Stack DD, Hricak H, BrantZawadzki MN, Callen PW, Higgins CB (1985) Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: fetal anatomy. Radiology 154: 427–432

    Google Scholar 

  9. Powell MC, Buckley J, Worthington BS, Symondse M (1986) Comparative study of conventional and MR pelvimetry. RSNA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Powell MC, Worthington BS, Symonds EM (1986) MRI: a new milestone in modern of care. Diagn Imag Int: 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  11. Powell MC, Buckley J, Worthington BS, Symonds EM (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging and hydatiform mole. Br J Radiol 59: 561–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sholl IS, Sabbagha RE (1984) Ultrasound detection. In: Lin CC, Evans MI (eds) Intrauterine growth retardation, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, pp 225–254

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith FW, Adam AH, Philips WDP (1983) Nuclear imaging in pregnancy. Lancet I: 61–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith FW, Kent C, Abramovich DR, Shtherland HW (1985) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: a new look at the fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92: 1024–1033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stark DD, McCarthy M, Filly RA, Parer JT, Hricak H, Callen PW (1985) Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR 144: 947–950

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stark DD, McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Callen PW, Hricak H, Parer JT (1985) Intrauterine growth retardation: Evaluation by magnetic resonance. Radiology 155: 425–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas A, Morris PG (1981) The effects of NMR exposure on living organisms I a microbial assay. Br J Radiol 54: 615–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinreb, Lowe, Santos-Ramos, Cunningham, Parkey (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging in obstetric diagnosis. Radiology 154: 157–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Héran, F. (1989). Obstetrical MRI. In: Vanel, D., et al. MRI of the Body. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87556-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87556-4_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-87558-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-87556-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics