Malformations pp 345-374 | Cite as

Anomalies of the Female Genitalia

  • Howard W. JonesJr.
Part of the Handbuch der Urologie / Encyclopedia of Urology / Encyclopédie d’Urologie book series (HDBUROL, volume 7 / 1)

Abstract

Reduplication of the vulva in whole or in part is an extremely rare but striking anomaly. The few duplications which have been reported are uniformly lateral and in the most extreme form have consisted of complete vulvar duplication with two clitorides, four labia majora, and four labia minora. Such duplications are associated with other anomalies, such as reduplication of the internal structures, i.e. vagina and uterus, bladder, rectum and colon, as well as an occasional anomaly of the bony structures where this has been investigated.

Keywords

Catheter Estrogen Rubber Assure Barium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, J.: A case of colon and ileum duplex. Brit. J. Surg. 37, 349 (1950).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azoury, R. S., and H. W. Jones Jr.: Cytogenetic findings in patients with congenital absence of the vagina. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 93, 335 (1965).Google Scholar
  3. Bell, B. W.: Further investigation into the chemical composition of menstrual fluid and the secretions of the vagina, as estimated from an analysis of haematocolpos with a discussion of the clinical features associated with haematocolpos, and a description of the character of the obstructing membrane. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Emp. 21, 209 (1912).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borglin, N. E., and P. Selander: Hymenal polyps of the newborn infant. Acta pediat., Suppl. 185, 28 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowman, J. A., and R. B. Scott: Transverse vaginal septum; report of four cases. Obstet. Gynec. 3, 441 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Breen, J. L., and C. R. Weinberg: Genitourinary and intestinal duplication. Case report and survey of the literature. Obstet. Gynec. 26, 804 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryan, A. L., J. A. Nigro, and V. S. Counseller: One hundred cases of congenital absence of the vagina. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 88, 79 (1949).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiarleoni, G.: Ann. Ostet. Ginec. 16, 469 (1894).Google Scholar
  9. Dennison, W. M., and P. Bacsich: Imperforate vagina in the new born. Arch. Dis. Child. 36, 156 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gedda, L.: Twins in history and science. Springfield (Ill.): Ch. C. Thomas 1963.Google Scholar
  11. Gemmell, R., and M. Paterson: Double vulvae. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Emp. 23, 139 (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones jr., H. W., E. Delfs, and G. E. S. Jones: Reproductive difficulties in double uterus. The place of plastic reconstruction. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 72, 865 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. ——— and G. E. S. Jones: Double uterus as an etiological factor in repeated abortion: Indications for surgical repair. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 65, 325 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanagasuntheram, R., and A. G. S. Dassanayakae: Nature of the obstruction membrane in primary cryptoamenorrhea. J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Emp. 65, 487 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koff, A. K.: Development of the vagina in the human fetus. Contrib. Embryol. 24, 59 (1933).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lesbre, F. X., et F. Vigot: Traité de tératologie, 1927.Google Scholar
  17. Lodi, A.: Contributo clinico statistico sulle malformazioni delà vagina osservate nella clinica, Obstetrica e Ginecologica di Milano del 1906 al 1950. Ann. Ostet. Ginec. 73, 1246 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McIndoe, A.: Treatment of congenital absence of obliterative condition of the vagina. Brit. J. plast. Surg. 2, 254 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. McKttsick, V. A., L. Baiter, C. E. Koop, and B. Scott: Hydrometrocolpos as a simply inherited malformation. J. Amer. med. Ass. 189, 813 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller, J.: Die Krankheiten des Eierstockes. In: Henke/Lubarsch, Handbuch der speziellen pathologischen Anatomie und Histologie, Bd. VII/3. Berlin 1937.Google Scholar
  21. Nichols, D. H., and A. V. Postloff: Congenital ectopic ovary. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 62, 195 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ombredanne, L.: Une fillete Splanchnodyme. Mém. Acad. Chir. 62, 747 (1936).Google Scholar
  23. Phelan, J. T., V. S. Counseller, and L. F. Greene: Deformities of the urinary tract with congenital absence of the vagina. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 97, 1 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Suppiger, J.: Bildungsfehler der weiblichen Beckenorgane. Korresp. Bl. Schweiz. Arzte 6, 418 (1876).Google Scholar
  25. TeLinde, R. W.: Operative Gynecology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co. 1962.Google Scholar
  26. Thompson, J. D., L. R. Clinton sr., and R. W. TeLinde: Congenital absence of the vagina. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 74, 397 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wharton, L. R.: Two cases of supernumerary ovary and one of accessory ovary, with an analysis of previously reported cases. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 78, 1101 (1939).Google Scholar
  28. Woolf, R. B., and W. M. Allen: Concomitant malformations; the frequent simultaneous occurrence of congenital malformations of the reproductive and urinary tracts. Obstet, and Gynec. 2, 234 (1953).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard W. JonesJr.

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations