Pyrochlore Group Minerals from the Qaqarssuk Carbonatite Complex

  • C. Knudsen
Part of the Special Publication No. 7 of the Society for Geology Applied to Mineral Deposits book series (MINERAL DEPOS., volume 7)

Abstract

The pyrochlore group minerals (PyGM) found in the Qaqarssuk carbonatite complex are located either in late carbonatite or in glimmerite and fenite adjacent to late stage lanthanide-rich carbonatite, often together with apatite, magnetite and zircon. No PyGM are found in carbonatites of the main intrusive phase. This indicates that Nb and Ta have been concentrated in, and precipitated from, the residual fluids.

Elements like Nb, Ta, U, Th and lanthanides are likely to have been soluble in the carbonatite magma as complexes with ligands like \(PO_4^{3 - }\), F- and \(CO_3^{2 - }\) possibly also influenced by Na+ and K+. The PyGM were precipitated where there was a decrease in concentration of the complexing ligands (1) simultaneously with precipitation of apatite, (2) in contact with or in the metasomatized wall rock (brown glimmerite and fenite), where there has been a high gradient of the complexing ligands and loss of alkalis during the metasomatic alteration of the wall rock.

The PyGM in the Qaqarssuk carbonatite complex show a wide compositional variation. Pyrochlore with a composition close to the end member NaCaNb2O6 (O, OH, F) is the most common PyGM species and species like bariopyrochlore, uranpyrochlore and betafite are present. A new mineral species, a Ba-betafite analogue, with Ba as the dominating A-cation and Ba exceeding 20% of total A-cations, has been found.

The composition of the PyGM varies with the rock type in which the minerals are found. U- and Ta-rich PyGM are found in fenite, PyGM with high Th and Ce are found in glimmerite and “pure” pyrochlore or zoned pyrochlore with a “pure” rim is found in carbonatite. The compositional variation in the PyGM with rock type is interpreted as precipitation of the most mobile elements in the most distal environment, the most mobile being those with the largest capacity for retaining the anions with which they form soluble complexes. With decreasing concentration of e. g. \(PO_4^{3 - }\), F and \(CO_3^{2 - }\) away from the intruding carbonatite, the cations as U, Th and lanthanides will be precipitated in PyGM in a sequence of increasing field strength.

A similar zonation can be observed in compositionally zoned pyrochlore grains with a U- and Ta-rich core, a Th-, Ce- or Ba-rich intermediate zone and a pure pyrochlore rim. The zoning of PyGM grains is interpreted as the result of a more or less continuous precipitation of pyrochlore with a composition in equilibrium with a fluid with increasing concentration of the complexing ligands, during the intrusion of carbonatite.

Keywords

Zircon Hydrated Silicate Uranium Geochemistry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleksandrov IV (1967) Niobium in the carbonate solutions and some considerations on the migration of rare elements under hydrothermal conditions. Geochem Int 4: 558–566Google Scholar
  2. Aleksandrov IV, Krasov AM, Kochnova LN (1985) The effects of potassium, sodium and fluorine on rock-forming mineral assemblages and the formation of tantaloniobate mineralization in rare-element granite pegmatites. Geochem Int 22 8: 85–94Google Scholar
  3. Borodin LS, Nazarenko II (1959) Chemical composition of pyrochlore and diadochic substitutions in the A2B2X7 molecule. Geochemistry 4: 330–349Google Scholar
  4. Boyle RW (1982) Geochemical prospecting for thorium and uranium deposits. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Deans T (1966) Economic mineralogy of African carbonatites. In: Tuttle OF, Gittins J (eds) Carbonatites. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 385–413Google Scholar
  6. Flynn RT, Burnham CW (1978) An experimental determination of rare earth partition coefficients between a chloride containing vapour phase and silicate melts. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 422: 685–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hogarth DD (1977) Classification and nomenclature of the pyrochlore group. Am Miner 62: 403–410Google Scholar
  8. Jäger E, Niggli E, van d Veen AH (1959) A hydrated barium-strontium pyrochlore in a biotite rock from Panda Hill, Tanganyika. Min Mag 32: 10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kapustin YuL (1980) Mineralogy of carbonatites. Amerind, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  10. Knudsen C (1985) Investigations of the Qaqarssuk carbonatite complex, southern West Greenland. Rapp Grønlands Geol Unders 125: 34–40Google Scholar
  11. Knudsen C (1986) Apatite mineralisation in carbonatite and ultramafic intrusions in Greenland. EEC contract MSM 119 DK. Final Rep Geol Surv Greenland, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  12. Kosterin AV (1959) The possible modes of transport of the rare earth by hydrothermal solutions. Geochemistry 4: 381–387Google Scholar
  13. Larsen LM, Rex DC, Secher K (1983) The age of carbonatites, kimberlites and lamprophyres from southern West Greenland: recurrent alkaline magmatism during 2500 mill, years. Lithos 16: 215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Veen AH van d. (1963) A study of pyrochlore. Ned Geol Minbouw Gen Geol Ser 22Google Scholar
  15. Wambeke L van (1970) The alteration processes of the complex titano-niobotantaeates and their consequences. N Jahrb Miner Abh 112: 117–149Google Scholar
  16. Whittaker EJW, Muntus R (1970) Ionic radii for use in geochemistry. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 34: 945–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Knudsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Geological Survey of GreenlandKøbenhavn KDenmark

Personalised recommendations