Advertisement

Knee Surgery pp 288-300 | Cite as

High Tibial Osteotomy

  • Martin W. Korn

Abstract

Painful knees with varus or valgus angular deformity and mainly unicompartmental noninflammatory arthritis can be symptomatically improved by corrective osteotomy about the knee. This is believed to be due to transferring the excessive weight-bearing forces from the diseased compartment to the less involved one. As larger and more intact articular surfaces share the weight-bearing forces, pressure decreases, degeneration of the overloaded compartment may slow or reverse, and pain diminishes or ceases. Coventry,1 Maquet,2,3 Fujisawa et a1,4 and Oldenbring et al5 reported that correction of angular deformity can lead to regrowth of an articular surface, which is thought to mature to a fibrocartilage. Analysis of the biomechanical forces involved in arthritic deformity has been published by Maquet,6 Chao,7 and Harding.8

Keywords

Total Knee Replacement High Tibial Osteotomy Mechanical Axis Anatomic Axis Anterior Tibial Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Coventry MB. Osteotomy of the upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1965; 47A: 984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maquet P. Biomechanics of the knee and surgical possibilities of healing ostioarthritic knees. Clin Orthop 1980; 146: 102.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maquet P. The treatment of choice in osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop 1985; 192: 108.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1979; 10: 585.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oldenbring S, Egund N, Lindstrand A, et al. Cartilage regeneration after proximal tibial osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop 1992; 277: 210–216.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maquet P. Biomechanics of the Knee. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chao E. Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy. In: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Symposium on Reconstructive Surgery of the Knee. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harding ML. A fresh appraisal of tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop 1976; 114: 223.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jackson JP, Waugh W. First high tibial osteotomy report for knee degenerative joint disease. J Bone Joint Surg 1958; 40B: 826.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson JP, Waugh W. Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1961; 43B: 746.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson LL. Arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty, historical and pathological perspective: present status. Arthroscopy 1986; 2: 54–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keene J, Dyreby J. High tibial osteotomy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65A: 36–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Korn MW. Combined arthroscopy and high tibial osteotomy. In: Shahriaree H (ed). Textbook of Arthroscopic Surgery. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992:437548.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenberg T, Paulos L, Parker R, et al. The 45 degree posterior-anterior flexion and weight-bearing radiograph of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1988; 70A: 1479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee: a radiographic investigation. Acta Radio! Suppl 1968; 277: 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin W. Korn

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations