Skip to main content

A Framework for Precise, Reusable Task Abstractions

  • Conference paper
Interactive Systems: Design, Specification, and Verification

Part of the book series: Focus on Computer Graphics ((FOCUS COMPUTER))

Abstract

Current methods for abstraction of task descriptions within the behavioral view are ad hoc, leading to imprecision, inconsistency, and ambiguity in task- and user-centered interface design representations. However, as interaction designers communicate with software designers and implementers, precise and consistent design representations are crucial.

Our experience with the User Action Notation (UAN) reveals the most difficulty in lower levels of abstraction, those levels just above the articulatory level of task description. This level is crucial in interface design because it is the level at which user actions are used to manipulate interface artifacts, or widgets. Even cases believed to be simple and well understood, such as the select task, are seen to be problematic. We argue for inclusion of semantics in task abstraction. We also argue for guiding lower level abstraction within the task-subtask hierarchy by bringing to bear other kinds of abstraction hierarchies, particularly domain-oriented and taxonomical hierarchies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berliner, D. C., Angell, D., and Shearer, J. W. Behaviors, Measures, and Instruments for Performance Evaluation in Simulated Environments. In Proceedings of Symposium and Workshop on the Quantification of Human Performance, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hartson, H. R., and Gray, P. D. Temporal Aspects of Tasks in the User Action Notation. Human-Computer Interaction. 7(1992), 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartson, H. R., Siochi, A. C., and Hix, D. The UAN: A User-Oriented Representation for Direct Manipulation Interface Designs. ACM Trans, on Info. Sys. 8, 3 (July 1990), 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hix, D., and Hartson, H. R. Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability Through Product and Process. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1993.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirwan, B., and Ainsworth, L. K. A Guide to Task Analysis., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laurel, B. K. “Interface as mimesis.” Chapter 4 in User Centered System Design. Norman and Draper ed. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986, 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lenorovitz, D. R., Phillips, M. D., Ardrey, R. S., and Kloster, G. V. “A Taxonomic Approach to Characterize Human-Computer Interfaces.” Human-Computer Interaction. Salvendy ed. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, 1984, 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayo, K. A. Task Mapping Model (TMM) Analysis Manual: A Reference. TR-93–07, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech (VPI&SU), Blacksburg, Virginia, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mayo, K. A., and Hartson, H. R. Synthesis-Oriented Situational Analysis in User Interface Design. In Proceedings of EWHCI’93: Third East-West International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Moscow, August 3–6)., 1993, 134–150.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moran, T. P. The Command Language Grammar: A Representation for the User Interface of Interactive Computer Systems. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies. 75 (1981), 3–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tauber, M. J. ETAG: Extended Task Action Grammar—A Language for the Description of the User’s Task Language. In Proceedings of IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction—INTERACT’90 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland), Cambridge, U.K., August 27–31, 1990, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weiler, H. G., and Hartson, H. R. Metaphors for the Nature of Human-Computer Interaction in an Empowering Environment: Interaction Style Influences the Manner of Human Accomplishment. 8 (1992), 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 EUROGRAPHICS The European Association for Computer Graphics

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hartson, H.R., Mayo, K.A. (1995). A Framework for Precise, Reusable Task Abstractions. In: Paternó, F. (eds) Interactive Systems: Design, Specification, and Verification. Focus on Computer Graphics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87115-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87115-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-87117-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-87115-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics