Advertisement

The natural history of recombination systems

Chapter

Abstract

The control of recombination is one of the most important parameters which determine the genetic composition, and hence the evolutionary potentialities, of any population. A good deal is now known about the mechanisms which bring about recombination in fungi, viz. heterokaryosis, parasexuality and the various mating systems, particularly the incompatibility systems. In 1942 Mather showed clearly that heterothaUism can be regarded as a control system for outbreeding in fungi. He, Whitehouse (1949) and Lewis (1954) have all demonstrated the potential degree of outbreeding which can result from the operation of various mating systems. Many other investigators, including Kniep, Vandendries, Buller and most of today’s speakers, have investigated, and are still investigating, the physiology and genetics of such systems. I am concerned, however, to try to describe how these systems actually operate in natural populations. When considering this question, it is not only necessary to know about the nature of the underlaying mechanisms but also the size of the breeding population, the numbers of mating-type factors and their distribution in space and time.

Keywords

Mating System Aspergillus Nidulans Recombination System Nuclear Migration Mating Ability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, H.L.: Studies on the sexuality of the Heterobasideae. Mycologia 29, 626–649 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biggs, R.: The species concept in Corticium coronilla. Mycologia 29, 686–706 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blakeslee, A.F., J.L. Cartledge, D.S. Welch, and A.D. Bergner: Sexual dimorphism in Mucorales 1. Intraspecific reactions. Botan. Gaz. 84, 27–90 (1927).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boidin, J.: Sur l’existence de races interstériles chez Gloeocystidium tenue (Pat); Étude morphologique et comportement nucléaire de leurs cultures. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 66, 204–219 (1950).Google Scholar
  5. Brunswik, H.: Untersuchungen über die Geschlechts- und Kernverhältnisse bei der Hymenomyzeten-Gattung Coprinus. Bot. Abh. K. Goebel 5, 1–152 (1924).Google Scholar
  6. Burnett, J.H.: The mating systems of fungi I. New Phytologist 55, 50–90 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnett, J.H., and M.E. Boulter: The mating systems of fungi II. Mating systems of the Gasteromycetes Mycocalia denudata and M. duriaeana. New Phytologist 62, 217–236 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnett, J.H., and D. Partington: Spatial distribution of fungal mating-type factors. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edinburgh 26, 61–68 (1957).Google Scholar
  9. Dodge, B.O., J.R. Singleton, and A. Rolnik: Studies on lethal E gene in Neurospora tetrasperma, including chromosome counts also in races of N. sitophila. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 94, 38–52 (1950).Google Scholar
  10. Dowding, E. S.: The sexuality of the normal, giant and dwarf spores of Pleurage anserina (Ces.) Kuntze. Ann. Botany 45, 1–14 (1931).Google Scholar
  11. Eggertson, E.: An estimate of the number of alleles at the loci for heterothallism in a local concentration of Polyporus obtusus. Canad. J. Botany 31, 710–759 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emerson, R.: Current trends of experimental research in aquatic Phycomycetes. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 169–200 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franke, G.: Die Cytologie der Ascusentwicklung von Podospora anserina. Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-L. 88, 159–160 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franke, G.: Versuche zur Genomverdoppelung des Ascomyceten Podospora anserina. Z. Vererb.-L. 93, 109–117 (1962).Google Scholar
  15. Fries, N.: Crucibulum vulgare Tul. und Cyathus striatus Pers. zwei Gasteromy- ceten mit tetrapolarer Geschlechts-Verteilung. Botan. Notiser 567–574 (1936).Google Scholar
  16. Fries, N.: Researches into the multipolar sexuality of Cyathus striatus Pers. Symbolae Botan. Upsalienses 4, 5–39 (1940).Google Scholar
  17. Fries, N., and L. Jonasson: Über die Infertilität verschiedener Stämme von Polyporus abietinus (Dicks.) Fr. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr. 35, 177–193 (1941).Google Scholar
  18. Galindo, J., and M.E. Gallegly: The nature of sexuality in Phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 50, 123–128 (1960).Google Scholar
  19. Gregory, P.H.: Microbiology of the Atmosphere, London (1961).Google Scholar
  20. Grindle, M.: Heterokaryon incompatibility of unrelated strains in the Aspergillus nidulans group. Heredity 18, 191–204 (1963a).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grindle, M.: Heterokaryon compatability of closely related wild isolates of Aspergillus nidulans. Heredity 18, 397–405 (1963b).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanna, W. F.: The problem of sex in Coprinus lagopus. Ann. Botany 39, 431–457 (1925).Google Scholar
  23. Jinks, J.L., and M. Grindle: Changes induced by training in Phytophthora infestans. Heredity 18, 245–264 (1963a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jinks, J.L., and M. Grindle: The genetical basis of heterokaryon incompatibility in Aspergillus nidulans. Heredity 18, 407–411 (1963b).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimura, K.: Diploidization in the Hymenomycetes I. Preliminary experiments. Biol. J. Okayama Univ. 1, 72–83 (1952).Google Scholar
  26. Köhler, F.: Genetische Studien an Mucor mucedo (Brefl.) I; II; III. Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-L. 70, 1–26; 27–39; 40–54 (1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kühner, R.: Le problème de la filiation des Agaricales à la lumière de nouvelles observations d’ordre cytologique sur les Agaricales Leucosporées. Bull. Soc. Linn. Lyon. 14, 160–164 (1945).Google Scholar
  28. Kühner, R., H. Romagnesi, and M.C. Yen: Différences morphologiques entre plusiers souches de Coprins de la section Micacei et confrontation de leurs haplontes. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 63, 169–186 (1947).Google Scholar
  29. Lamoure, D.: Hétérocaryose chez les Basidiomycètes amphithalles. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 244, 2841–2843 (1957).Google Scholar
  30. Lange, M.: Species concept in the genus Coprinus. Dansk. bot. Arkiv. 14, 7–162 (1952).Google Scholar
  31. Lewis, D.: Comparative incompatibility in Angiosperms and Fungi. Advan. Genet. 6, 235–285 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Macrae, R.: Genetical and sexual studies in some higher Basidiomycetes. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Toronto (1941).Google Scholar
  33. Mather, K.: Heterothally as an outbreeding mechanism in fungi. Nature, London 149, 54–57 (1942).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKeen, C. V.: A cultural and taxonomic study of three species of Peniophora. Canad. J. Botany 30, 764–787 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Middleton, R.B.: Sexual and somatic recombination in common-AB hetero- caryons. Am. J. Botany 51, 379–387 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mounce, I.: Studies in forest pathology. The biology of Fomes pinicola (Sw.) Cooke. Bull. Dept. Agric. Canada 111, 1–77 (1929).Google Scholar
  37. Mounce, I., and R. Macrae: The behaviour of paired monosporus mycelia of Fomes roseus (Abb. & Schw.) Cooke and F. subroseus (Wier.) Overh. Canad. J. Res. C, 15, 154–161 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mounce, I., and R. Macrae: Infertility phenomena in Fomes pinicola. Canad. J. Res. C. 16, 364–376 (1938).Google Scholar
  39. Nelson, R.R.: Interspecific hybridization in fungi. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 31–48 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Niederhauser, J.S.: The blight, the blighter and the blighted. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., Ser. II, 19, 55–63 (1956).Google Scholar
  41. Nobles, M. K.: Cultural characters as a guide to the taxonomy and phylogeny of the Polyporaceae. Canad. J. Botany 36, 883–926 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Partington, M.: Mating systems of fungi with special reference to Polystictus versicolor. Ph. D. Thesis, University of St. Andrews (1959).Google Scholar
  43. Raestead, R.: The relation between Polyporus abietinus (Dicks ex Fr.) Fr. and Irpex fusco-violaceus (Ehrenb. ex Fr.) Fr. Nytt. Mag. Naturvid. 81, 207–231 (1941).Google Scholar
  44. Raper, J.R., G.S. Krongelb, and M.G. Baxter: The number and distribution of incompatibility factors in Schizophyllum commune. Am. Naturalist 92, 221–234 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roshal, J.Y.: Incompatibility factors in a population of Schzophyllum commune. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Chicago 1950.Google Scholar
  46. Sansome, E. R.: Meiosis in Pythium debaryanum Hesse and its significance in the life-history of the Biflagellatae. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 46, 63–72 (1963.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saunders, M.: The distribution of fungal mating-type factors with special reference to Polyporus betulinus. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Liverpool 1956.Google Scholar
  48. Savage, E. J., and C.W. Clayton: Interspecific hybridization in the genus Phytophthora. Phytopathology 52, 1220 (1962).Google Scholar
  49. Shear, C.L., and B.O. Dodge: Life histories of the red bread-mould fungi of the Monilia sitophila group. J. Agr. Res. 34, 1019–1042 (1927).Google Scholar
  50. Snider, P.J.: Genetic evidence for nuclear migration in Basidiomycetes. Genetics 48, 47–55 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Smoot, J.J., F.J. Gough, H.A. Lamey, J.J. Eichenmuller, and M.E. Gallegly: Production and germination of oospores of Phytophthora infestans Phytopathology 48, 165–171 (1958).Google Scholar
  52. Swiezynski, K.M., and P.R. Day: Heterokaryon formation in Coprinus lagopus. Genet. Res. Camb. 1, 114–128 (1960a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swiezynski, K.M., and P.R. Day: Migration of nuclei in Coprinus lagopus. Genet. Res. Camb. 1, 129–139 (1960b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verrall, A. F.: Variation in Fomes ignarius. Tech. Bull. Minn. Agr. Expt. Sta. 117, 1–41 (1937).Google Scholar
  55. Whitehouse, H.L.K.: Heterothallism and sex in fungi. Biol. Rev. 24, 411–447 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Winge, Ö.: Le croissement inter-specifique chez les champignons. Scientia Genetica 2, 171–189 (1941).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1965

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations