Genetic investigation into the mode of action of the genes controlling self incompatibility and heterothallism in Basidiomycetes

  • Yair Parag

Abstract

An essential problem in tetrapolar incompatibility is the means by which the specific information carried by the incompatibility genes determine compatibility or incompatibility of a given mycelium with another ; this is the problem of the physical basis of the action of the incompatibility gene. A second problem is to determine which developmental stages of the sexual process are affected by the incompatibility mechanism; this is a physiological problem. The first deals with the specific information carried by the incompatibility genes ; the other deals with the detailed mechanisms by which this information is translated to actual incompatibility or compatibility, regardless of the specificity of this information.

Keywords

Migration Recombination Tryptophan Histidine Poss 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein, H., and A. Miller: Complementation studies with isoleucine-valine mutants of Neurospora crassa. Genetics 46, 1039–1052 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Catcheside, D.G.: Complementation among histidine mutants of Neurospora crassa. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), Ser. B. 153, 179–194 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Colson, B.: The cytology of the mushroom Psalliota campestris. Ann. Botany 49, 1–18 (1935).Google Scholar
  4. Day, P.R.: The structure of the A mating type factor in Coprinus lagopus. Genetics 45, 641–650 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Day, P.R.: Mutations of the A mating type factor in Coprinus lagopus. Genet. Res. Camb. 4, 55–64 (1963a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Day, P.R.: The structure of the A mating type factor in Coprinus lagopus: wild alleles. Genet. Res. Camb. 4, 323–325 (1963b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Day, P.R.: The genetics of tetrapolar incompatibility. This Symposium, pp. 31–36 (1965).Google Scholar
  8. Dick, S.: Physiological aspects of tetrapolar incompatibility. This Symposium, pp. 72–80 (1965).Google Scholar
  9. Dunn, L. C.: Analysis of a complex gene in the house mouse. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 21, 187–195 (1956).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fincham, J. R. S.: Genetically controlled differences in enzyme activity. Advan. Enzymol. 22, 1–43 (1960).Google Scholar
  11. Fincham, J. R. S., and P.R. Day: Fungal Genetics. Blackwell, Oxford, 360p. (1963).Google Scholar
  12. Flexer, A. S.: Bipolar incompatibility in Polyporus palustris. Ph. D. Thesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University 1963.Google Scholar
  13. Fries, N.: Researches into the multipolar sexuality of Cyathus striatus Pers. Symbolae Botan. Upsalienses 4, 1–39 (1940).Google Scholar
  14. Fries, N.: Über das Vorkommen von geographischen Rassen bei Crucibulum vulgare. Arch. Mikrobiol. 13, 182–190 (1943).Google Scholar
  15. Fries, N., and L. Jonasson: Über die Infertilität verschiedener Stämme von Polyporus abietinus (Dicks.) Fr. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr. 35, 177–193 (1941).Google Scholar
  16. Horowitz, N.H., M. Fling, H. Macleod, and N. Sueoka: A genetic study of new structural forms of tyrosinase in Neurospora. Genetics 46, 1015–1024 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Klushnikova, E. S.: The wild Psalliota campestris, its sexual characters and its relation to the cultivated mushroom. Bull. Soc. Vat. Moscou, 48, 53–58 (In Russian, English summary) (1939).Google Scholar
  18. Kühner, R.: La Genre Mycena. Encyclopédie Mycologique, Vol. 10, Paris (1938).Google Scholar
  19. Lamoure, D.: Hétérocaryose chez les Basidiomycètes amphithalles. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 244, 2841–2843 (1957).Google Scholar
  20. Lange, M.: Species concept in the genus Coprinus, a study on the significance of interfertility. Dansk. Bot. Ark. 14, 1–164 (1952).Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, D.: Comparative incompatibility in angiosperms and fungi. Advan. Genet. 6, 235–285 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis, D.: Growth and genetics of higher fungi. Nature 190, 399–400 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Middleton, R.B.: Sexual and somatic recombination in common-AB heterokaryons of Schzophyllum commune. Genetics 50, 701–710 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Parag, Y.: Genetic studies on somatic recombination and common-B heterokaryosis in Schzophyllum commune. Ph. D. Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 172p. (1960).Google Scholar
  25. Parag, Y.: Mutations in the B incompatibility factor of Schizophyllum commune. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 48, 743–750 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parag, Y., and J.R. Raper: Genetic recombination in a common-B cross of Schizophyllum commune. Nature 188, 765–766 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pontecorvo, G.: Trends in Genetic Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 145p. (1958).Google Scholar
  28. Prévost, G.: Étude génétique d’un Basidiomycète: “Coprinus radiatus” Fr. ex Bolt. Ph. D. Thesis, Paris. 195p. (1962).Google Scholar
  29. Quintanilha, A., and J. Pinto-Lopes: Apercu sur l’état actuel de nos connaissances concernant la »conduite sexuelle« des espèces d’Hymenomycètes. I. Bol. Soc. Broter. 2a ser., 24, 115–290 (1950).Google Scholar
  30. Raper, C.A., and J.R. Raper: Mutations affecting heterokaryosis in Schizophyllum commune. Am. J. Botany 51, 503–512 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raper, J. R.: Tetrapolar sexuality. Quart. Rev. Biol. 28, 233–259 (1953).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raper, J. R.: Sexual versatility and evolutionary processes in fungi. Mycologia 51, 107–125 (1959 a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raper, J. R.: Schizophyllum umbrinum Berkeley in culture. Mycologia 51, 474–476 (1959 b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raper, J. R.: The control of sex in fungi. Am. J. Botany 47, 794–808 (1960a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raper, J. R.: Tetrapolarity in Schzophyllum fasciatum. Mycologia 52, 334–336 (1960 b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raper, J. R., M. G. Baxter, and A. H. Ellingboe: The genetic structure of the incompati bility factors in Schzophyllum commune. The A factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 46, 883–842 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raper, J. R., M. G. Baxter, and R. B. Middleton: The genetic structure of the incompatibility factors in Schzophyllum commune. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 44, 889–900 (1958a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raper, J. R., D.H. Boyd, and C.A. Raper: Primary and secondary mutations in the in compatibility loci oiSchizophyllum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 53, 1324–1332 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raper, J. R., G.S. Krongelb, and M.G. Baxter: The number and distribution of incompatibility factors in Schzophyllum. Am. Naturalist 92, 221–232 (1958b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sarazin, A.: The Cultivated Mushrooms. Morphology, Cytology, Evolution, Nutrition and Cultivation. (English translation.) Mushroom Growers’ Association, 45 Bedford Sq., London. 75p. (1955).Google Scholar
  41. Sass, J.E.: The cytological basis for homothallism and heterothaUism in the Agaricaceae. Am. J. Botany 16, 663–701 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, A. H.: Investigation of two-spored forms in the genus Mycena. Mycologia 26, 305–331 (1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Takahashi, T.: Complementary genes controlling homothallism in Saccharomyces. Genetics 43, 705–715 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Whitehouse, H.L. K.: Multiple-allelomorph heterothaUism in the fungi. New Phytologist 48, 212–244 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Winge, Ö., and C. Roberts: A gene for diploidization in yeast. Compt. Rend. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg, Serie Physiologique 24, 341–346 (1949).Google Scholar
  46. Woodward, D.O.: A gene concept based on genetic and chemical studies in Neurospora. Quart. Rev. Biol. 35, 313–323 (1960).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woodward, D.O., C.W.H. Partridge, and N.H. Giles: Complementation at the ad-4 locus in Neurospora crassa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 44, 1237–1244 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yanofsky, C.: The tryptophan synthetase system. Bacteriol. Rev. 24, 221–245 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Yanofsky, C., and P. St. Lawrence: Gene action. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 311–340 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zattler, F.: Vererbungsstudien an Hutpilzen (Basidiomyzeten). Z. Botan. 16, 433–499 (1924).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yair Parag

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations