Advertisement

Remarks on Passive Transfer

  • Nicole Hunziker

Abstract

Passive transfer of the eczematous sensitivity is very important in understanding the mechanism of the delayed eczematous reaction, all the more so since until now, it has not been possible to prove the existence of antibodies in the serum, in either man or animals. This impossibility has led certain authors (Karush and Eisen, 1962) to believe that the concentration of antibodies does not reach a level which is detectable by current immunological techniques. Other authors believe that the antibodies are bound to the cells and are transferred by the cells and not through the serum (Landsteiner and Chase, 1942).

Keywords

Patch Test Passive Transfer Simple Substance Hematological Variation Urticarial Reaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Baer, R. L., F. Serri, and D. Kirman: Attempts at passive transfer of allergic eczematous sensitivity in man by means of white cell suspension. J. invest. Derm. 19,217–225 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, R. L., M. B. Sulzberger: Attempts at passive transfer of allergic eczematous sensitivity in man. J. invest. Derm. 18, 53–59 (1952).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballestero, L. H., and A. H. Mom: Passive transfer of experimental contact dermatitis with the Urbach-Koenigstein technique. Ann. Allergy 3, 435–439 (1945).Google Scholar
  4. Bizzozzero, E., A. Ferrari: Sull’idiosincrasia all’iodoformo. G.ital. Derm. SiL 72,3–24 (1931).Google Scholar
  5. Brandt, R., u. J. Konrad: Passive Übertragung einer Kanincheneiweißidiosynkrasie mittels der Blasenmethode von Königstein-Urbach. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Berl.) 161, 485–491 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chase, H. W.: The cellular transfer of cutaneous hypersensitivity to tuberculin. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 59, 134–135 (1945).Google Scholar
  7. Chase, H. W.: Studies on the sensitization of animals with simple chemical compounds. X. Antibodies inducing immediate-type skin reactions. J. exp. Med. 86, 489–514 (1947).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chase, H. W.: Immunological reactions mediated through cells. In: Pappenheimer jr., A. M. (Ed.): The nature and significance of the antibody response, p. 156. New York: Columbia University Press 1953.Google Scholar
  9. Crepea, S. B., and R. A. Cooke: Study on the mechanism of dermatitis venenata in the guinea pig with a demonstration of skin-sensitizing antibody by passive transfer. J. Allergy 19, 353–357 (1948).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, W. L., and A. M. Kligman: Transfer of allergic contact-type delayed sensitivity in man. J. invest. Derm. 28, 291–304 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fellner, B.: Überimpfungsversuche mit Pirketschen Papelsubstanzen am Menschen. Wien. klin. Wschr. 32, 936–941 (1919).Google Scholar
  12. Fellner, B.: Experimentelle Beiträge zum Nachweis der cellulären Sitzes der Idiosynkrasie (Veramon, Cofferylin). Klin. Wschr. 12, 540–542 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuhs, H., u. G. Riehl jr.: Über familiäre Salvarsanidiosynkrasie und ihre gelungene passive Übertragung. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Berl.) 154, 88–95 (1928).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grimmer, H., u. H. W. Spier: Histologische Verifizierung der passiven Übertragbarkeit des tierexperimentellen Kontaktekzems. Zur Interferenz toxischer und allergischer Epicutanreaktionen. Hautarzt 12, 300–306 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Groth, O.: Studies on contact skin reactions and normal skin of passively sensitized guineapigs. 1. A histological study of test lesions in recipients after passive transfer of dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) hypersensitivity with lymphoid cells. Acta Soc. Med. upsalien. 68, 193–214 (1963).Google Scholar
  16. Guthries, R. K., G. E. Lowke, J. K. Ferguson, and W. L. Ellis: Contact hypersensitivity to simple chemicals. Time after donor sensitization as a factor in passive transfer. J. invest. Derm. 46, 224–229 (1966).Google Scholar
  17. Hagerman, G.: How is epidermal hypersensitivity transmitted through lymphocytes. Acta derm.-venereol. (Kbh.) 34, 51–56 (1954).Google Scholar
  18. Hamilton, L. D., and M. W. Chase: Labelled cells in the cellular transfer of delayed hypersensitivity. Fed. Proc. 21, 40 (1962).Google Scholar
  19. Harber, L. C., and R. L. Baer: Attempts to transfer eczematous contact-type allergy with whole blood transfusions. J. invest. Derm. 36, 55–60 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Haxthausen, H.: Studies on the role of the lymphocytes as transmitter of the hypersensitiveness in allergic eczema. Acta derm.-venereol. (Kbh.) 27, 275–286 (1947).Google Scholar
  21. Haxthausen, H.: Passive transmission of dinitrochlorbenzene allergy with white blood cells from sensitized guinea pigs. Acta derm.-venereol. (Kbh.) 31, 659–665 (1951).Google Scholar
  22. Haxthausen, H.: Experiments on passive transfer of eczematous allergy. J. invest. Derm. 19, 293–296 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunziker, N.: Experimental eczema. 22nd comm. “Passive transfer” of guinea pig’s hypersensitivity to citraconic anhydride. Dermatologica (Basel) 129, 475–478 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jadassohn, W.: Die Immunbiologie der Haut. Handb. Haut- u. Geschlechtskr., Bd. 2, S. 353–478. Berlin: Springer 1932.Google Scholar
  25. Jeter, W. S., M. M. Tremaine, and P. M. Seebohm: Passive transfer of delayed hypersensitivity to 2,4 Dinitrochlorobenzene in guinea-pigs with leucocytes extracts. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 86, 251–253 (1954).Google Scholar
  26. Karush, F., and H. N. Eisen: A theory of delayed hypersensitivity. The man features of this phenomenon are explicable in terms of high-affinity humoral antibody. Science 136, 1032–1039 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kind, P. D., F. C. Bocobo, A. C. Curtis, and P. Bulala: Cellular passive transfer of contact hypersensitivity to paraphenylenediamine and to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene in guinea pigs. J. invest. Derm. 44, 7–11 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Königstein: Wien, dermatol. Ges. 17. XL 1921.Google Scholar
  29. Landsteiner, K., and M. Chase: Experiments on transfer of cutaneous sensitivity to simple compounds. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 49, 688–690 (1942).Google Scholar
  30. Lawrence, H. S.: Delayed hypersensitivity and the behavior of the cellular transfer system in animal and man, p. 453–461. In: J. H. Shaffer, G. A. Logrippo, and M. W. Chase (Ed.): Mechanisms of hypersensitivity. Boston-Toronto: Little Brown Co. 1959.Google Scholar
  31. Leider, M., and R. L. Baer: The present status of passive transfer antibodies in allergic eczematous contact-type dermatitis. Failure to demonstrate passive transfer antibodies. J. invest. Derm. 10, 425–433 (1948).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mccluskey, R. T., R. Benacerraf, and J. W. McCluskey: Studies on the specificity of the cellular infiltrate in delayed hypersensitivity reactions. J. Immunol. 90, 466–477 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Meneghini, C. L., and G. Cozza: The passive transfer of the allergic contact-type sensitivity, with particular regard to the passive transfer by means of human lymphocytes. Read at Vlth international Congress of Allergology Stockholm, sept. 5–9, 1965.Google Scholar
  34. Meneghini, C. L., and G. Cozza, et L. Levi: Allergie eczémateuse: essais de transport passif. Acta allerg. (Kbh.) 13, 432–441 (1959).Google Scholar
  35. Meneghini, C. L., and G. Cozza, et G. Cozza: Observations ultérieures sur la tentative de transport passif de la sensibilisation du type eczémateux par contact moyennant transfusions de sang, homogénats et greffes cutanées. p. 400–403. C.R. Vth European Congress of Allergology, ed. R. Schuppli. Basel: Schwabe 1963.Google Scholar
  36. Metaxas, M. N., and M. Metaxas-Bühler: Passive transfer of local cutaneous hypersensitivity to tuberculin. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 69, 163–165 (1948).Google Scholar
  37. Metaxas, M. N., and M. Metaxas-Bühler: Über passive lokale Tuberkulinallergie. Rev. suisse path. bact. 11, 414–422 (1948).Google Scholar
  38. Najarian, J. S., and J. D. Feldman: Passive transfer of tuberculin sensitivity by tritiated thymidine-labeled lymphoid cells. J. exp. Med. 114, 779–790 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Najarian, J. S., and J. D. Feldman: Passive transfer of transplantation immunity. 1. Tritiated lymphoid cells. II Lymphoid cells in millipore chambers. J. exp. Med. 115, 1083–1093 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Najarian, J. S., and J. D. Feldman: Passive transfer of contact sensitivitv by tritiated thymidine-labeled lymphoid cells. J. exp. Med. 117, 775–780 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Najarian, J. S., and J. D. Feldman: Specificity of passively transferred delayed hypersensitivity. J. exp. Med. 118, 341–352 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nilzen, a.: Some endocrine aspects of skin sensitization and primary irritation. 1. Observations on the influence of cortisone on cutaneous irritation and sensitization induced by various chemical compounds. J. invest. Derm. 18, 7–35 (1952).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perutz, a.: Untersuchungen über die Jodoformdermatitis. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Berl.) 154, 206–216 (1928).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schröpl, F., H. Röckl u. U. Grünberg: Zur Problematik der passiven Übertragung der allergischen Spätreaktion vom Ekzemtyp. Arch. klin. exp. Derm. 225, 335–352 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Serri, F.: Tentativi di trasporto passivo della sensibilita al 2:4 dinitrochlorobenzene nelle cavia a mezzo di poltiglie di fegato, polmoni, midollo, surreni e milza. G. ital. Derm. Sif. 95, 541–550 (1954).Google Scholar
  46. Serri, F.: Sulla possibilitä di trasporto passivo della sensibilita eczematosa allergica del tipo da contatto nell’uomo a mezzo di trasfusioni di sangue totale. Minerva derm. 34,542 (1959).Google Scholar
  47. Skog, E.: Experimental studies on hypersensitivity to 2,4 dinitrochlorbenzene and tuberculin in animals. Acta derm, venereol. (Kbh.) 35, 93–106 (1955).Google Scholar
  48. Spier, H. W.: Zur Pathogenese des Ekzems. Fortschr. prakt. Derm. u. Ven., Bd. 5, S. 150–165. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1965.Google Scholar
  49. Sulzberger, M. B.: Dermatologie allergy. Springfield: Thomas 1940.Google Scholar
  50. Turk, J. L.: The passive transfer of delayed hypersensitivity in guinea pigs by the transfusion of isotopically labeled lymphoid cells. Immunology 5, 478–488 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Turk, J. L., and G. L. Asherson: Attempts to transfer contact sensitivity passively with subcellular fractions in the guinea pig. A study of the specificity of such reactions. Int. Arch. Allergy 21, 321–325 (1962).Google Scholar
  52. Urbach, E.: Zur Pathogenese der cutanen Idiosynkrasien. Arch. Derm. Syph. (Berl.) 148, 146–157 (1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. De Weck, A., et R. Brun: De l’eczéma expérimental. 4ème comm. A propos de Thistologie des réactions obtenues par transfert de la sensibilité. Acta derm.-venereol. (Stockh.) 36, 360–368 (1956).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Hunziker
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Prof. hon. E. Bujard (Medical School)University Clinic of DermatologyGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations