Advertisement

The Genetics of Heterostyly

  • D. Lewis
  • D. A. Jones
Part of the Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics book series (GENETICS, volume 15)

Abstract

Breeding experiments on the genetics of heterostyly began in the 19th century led by Hildebrand (1866) and by Darwin (1877), before Mendel’s work was rediscovered in 1900. Bateson and Gregory (1905) introduced their paper on the inheritance of heterostylism in Primula with the statement: “In view of the results obtained by Darwin, Hildebrand and others, it seemed likely that the characters long-style and short-style, well known in Primulaceae and other orders, might have a Mendelian inheritance. Our experiments have shown that this is the case in P. sinensis, the short style being dominant, the long recessive.”

Keywords

Pollen Tube Pollen Size Style Length Lythrum Salicaria Stigmatic Papilla 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker HG (1962) Heterostyly in the Connaraceae with special reference to Byrsocarpiis coccincus. Bot Gaz 123:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker HG (1966) The evolution, functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. 1. The Plumbaginaceae. Evolution 20:349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow N (1913) Preliminary note on heterostylism in Oxalis and Lythrum. J Genet 3:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow N (1923) Inheritance of the three forms in trimorphic species. J Genet 13:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett SCH (1985) Floral trimorphism and monomorphism in continental and island populations of Eichhornia paniculate (Spreng.) Solms. (Pontederiaceae) Biol J Lin Soc 25:41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrett SCH, Morgan MT, Husband BC (1989) The dissolution of a complex genetic polymorphism: the evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 43:1398–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bateson W, Gregory RP (1905) On the inheritance of heterostylism in Primula. Proc R Soc Ser B 76:581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodmer WF (1960) The genetics of homostyly in populations of Primula vulgaris. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 242:517–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewbaker JL (1959) Biology of the angiosperm pollen grain. Ind J Genet Plant Breed 19:121–133Google Scholar
  10. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1979) The maintenance and breakdown of distyly. Am Nat 114:499–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crosby JL (1949) Selection of an unfavourable gene-complex. Evolution 3:212–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crosby JL (1959) Outcrossing on homostyle primroses. Heredity 13:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darlington CD (1929) The significance of chromosome behaviour in polyploids for the theory of meiosis. John Innes Hortic Inst Conf Polyploids, p 42Google Scholar
  14. Darlington CD, Mather K (1949) The elements of genetics. Allen and Unwin, LondGoogle Scholar
  15. Darwin C (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Murray, LondCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Winton D, Haldane JBS (1931) Linkage in the tetraploid Primula sinensis. J Genet 24:121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dowrick VPJ (1956) Heterostyiy and homostyly in Primula obconica. Heredity 10:219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dulberger R (1970a) Floral dimorphism in Anchusa hybrida Ten. Isr J Bot 19:37–41Google Scholar
  19. Dulberger R (1970b) Tristyly in Lythrum junceum. New Phytol 69:751–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ernst A (1925) Genetische Studien über Heterostylie bei Primula. Arch Julius Klaus Stift Vererbungsforsch Sozialanthropol Rassenhyg 1:13–62Google Scholar
  21. Ernst A (1928) Zur Vererbung der morphologischen Heterostylie-Merkmale. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 46:573–588Google Scholar
  22. Ernst A (1936) Weitere Untersuchungen zur Phänanalyse, zum Fertilitätsproblem und zur Genetik heterostyler Primeln 2. Primula hortensis Wettstein. Arch Julius Klaus Stift Vererbungsforsch Sozialanthropol Rassenhyg 11:1–280Google Scholar
  23. Ernst A (1950) Resultate aus Kreuzungen zwischen der tetraploiden, monomorphen Pr. japonica und diploiden, mono- und dimorphen Arten der Sektion Candelabra. Arch Julius Klaus Stift Vererbungsforsch Sozialanthropol Rassenhyg 25:135–236Google Scholar
  24. Ernst A (1955) Untersuchungen zur Phänanalyse, zum Fertilitätsproblem und zur Genetik heterostyler Primeln 4. Die F2-F5-Nachkommenschaften der Bastarde Pr. (hortensis × viscosa). Erster Teil. Arch Julius Klaus Stift Vererbungsforsch Sozialanthropol Rassenhyg 30:13–137Google Scholar
  25. Ernst A (1957) Austausch und Mutation im Komplex-Gen für Blütenplastik und Inkompatibilität bei Primula. Z Indukt Abstammungs Vererbungsl 88:517–599Google Scholar
  26. Ernst A (1958) Untersuchungen zur Phänanalyse, zum Fertilitätsproblem und zur Genetik heterostyler Primeln 4. Die F2-F5-Nachkommenschaften der Bastarde Pr. (hortensis × viscosa). Dritter Teil. Arch Julius Klaus Stift Vererbungsforsch Sozialanthropol Rassenhyg 33:103–251Google Scholar
  27. Esser K (1953) Genomverdopplung und Pollenschlauchwachstum bei Heterostylen. Z Indukt Abstammungs Vererbungsl 85:28–50Google Scholar
  28. Fisher RA, Mather K (1943) The inheritance of style length in Lythrum salicaria. Ann Eugenics 12:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fyfe VC (1956) Two modes of inheritance of the short-styled form in the “genus” Oxalis. Nature (Lond) 177:942–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ganders F (1975) Heterostyiy, homostyly, and fecundity in Amsinckia spectabilis (Boraginaceae). Madroño 23:56–62Google Scholar
  31. Ganders F (1979) The biology of heterostyiy. N Z J Bot 17:607–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garber RJ, Quisenberry KS (1927) The inheritance of length of style in buckwheat. J Agric Res 34:181–183Google Scholar
  33. Grüneberg H (1938) An analysis of the “pleiotropic” effects of a new lethal mutation in the rat (Mus norvegicus). Proc R Soc B 125:123–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haldane JBS (1933) Two new allelomorphs for heterostylism in Primula. Am Nat 67:559–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hildebrand F (1866) Über den Trimorphismus in der Gattung Oxalis. Monatsber König Preuss Akad Wiss Berl 1866:352–374Google Scholar
  36. Lewis D (1942) The physiology of incompatibility in plants. 1. The effect of temperature. Proc R Soc B 131:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis D (1943) The physiology of incompatibility in plants. 2. Limim grandiflorum. Ann Bot 7:115–122Google Scholar
  38. Lewis D (1949) Incompatibility in flowering plants. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 24:472–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis D (1954) Comparative incompatibility in angiosperms and fungi. Adv Genet 6:235–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewis D (1975) Heteromorphic incompatibility system under disruptive selection. Proc R Soc B 188:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewis D (1982) Incompatibility, stamen movement and pollen economy in a heterostyled tropical forest tree, Cratoxylum formosum (Guttiferae). Proc R Soc B 214:273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lewis D, Crowe LK (1958) Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12:233–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis D, Rao AN (1971) Evolution of dimorphism and population polymorphism in Pemphis acidula Forst. Proc R Soc B 178:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewis D, Verma SC, Zuberi MI (1988) Gametophytic-sporophytic incompability in the Cruciferae — Raphanus sativits. Heredity 61:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lund HA (1956) Growth hormones in the styles and ovaries of tobacco responsible for fruit development. Am J Bot 43:562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mather K (1950) The genetical architecture of heterostyly in Primula sinensis. Evolution 4:340–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mather K, De Winton D (1941) Adaptation and counter-adaptation of the breeding system in Primula. Ann Bot 5:297–311Google Scholar
  48. McClelland TB (1919) Influence of foreign pollen on the development of Vanilla fruits. J Agric Res 16:245–251Google Scholar
  49. Mulcahy DL (1964) The reproductive biology of Oxalis priceae. Am J Bot 51:1045–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ornduff R (1964) The breeding system of Oxalis suksdorfd. Am J Bot 51:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ornduff R (1966) The origin of dioecism from heterostyly in Nymphoides (Menyanthaceae). Evolution 20:309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ornduff R (1972) The breakdown of trimorphic incompatibility in Oxalis section Corniculatae. Evolution 26:52–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ornduff R (1979) The genetics of heterostyly in Hypericum aegypticum. Heredity 42:271–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ornduff R (1980) The probable genetics of distyly in Gelsemium sempervirens (Loganiaceae). Can J Genet Cytol 22:303–304Google Scholar
  55. Pellew C (1928) Annual Report John Innes Horticultural Institution for 1928, p 13. Innes Inst, Norwich, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  56. Philp J (1929) Annual Report John Innes Horticultural Institution for 1929, p 24–25. Innes Inst, Norwich, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  57. Piper J (1984) Breeding system evolution in Primula vulgaris. PhD Thesis, Univ Sussex, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  58. Ray PM, Chisaki HF (1957) Studies of Amsinckia. 1. A synopsis of the genus, with a study of heterostyly in it. Am J Bot 44:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Richards AJ, Ibrahim HB (1982) The breeding system in Primula veris L. 2. Pollen tube growth and seed-set. New Phytol 90:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Richards JH, Barrett SCH (1984) The developmental basis of tristyly in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Am J Bot 71:1347–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sampson DR (1971) Mating group ratios in distylic Forsythia (Oleaceae). Can J Genet Cytol 13:368–371Google Scholar
  62. Schou O, Philipp M (1984) An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system. 3. On the genetic control of distyly and self-incompatibility in Anchusa officinalis L. (Boraginaceae). Theor Appl Genet 68:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shore JS, Barrett SCH (1985) The genetics of distyly and homostyly in Turnera ulmifolia L. (Turneraceae). Heredity 55:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Somme AS (1930) Genetics and cytology of the tetraploid form of Primula sinensis. J Genet 23:447–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stirling J (1936) Studies of flowering in heterostyled and allied species. 3. Gentianaceae, Lythraceae, Oxalidaceae. Publ Hartley Bot Lab, Univ Liverpool, 15:3–24Google Scholar
  66. Stevens NE (1912) Observations on heterostylous plants. Bot Gaz 53:277–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stout AB (1925) Studies on Lythrum salicaria. 2. A new form of flower in this species. Bull Torrey Bot Club 52:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tatebe T (1964) Physiological studies on the fertilization of Lythrum salicaria L. 2. On pollen tube growth. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 33:155–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Von Ubisch G (1926) Koppelung von Farbe und Heterostylie bei Oxalis rosea. Biol Zentrabi 46:633–645Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Lewis
    • 1
  • D. A. Jones
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations