Epidemiology of Esophageal Cancer from the European Point of View

  • R. Earlam


Epidemiological data are usually presented in tables with masses of figures collected by experts who seem relatively uninterested in selling their data to a wider public. There are several reasons why surgeons should be interested in the epidemiology of cancer apart from the intellectual interest in the figures alone or their use in searching for aetiology and subsequently prevention of the disease. The main reason is proper assessment of treatment and comparison of the results of different therapies by “medical audit” or “peer review.” It is absolutely essential to have details about the original patient population treated because all surgical series have some bias of selection. Epidemiological data will give the overall incidence in a country but this must be standardised by reference to a standard population with regard to age and sex. Most centrally collected data unfortunately do not contain the other essential facts, which are histology and staging. Some of the Regional Centres in the UK do collect these details as well as those of treatment, but only from a minority of the total population. It therefore follows that the necessary information for medical audit, either of an individual surgeon or of a country, has to be gathered from several sources (Earlam et al. 1982; Earlam 1984). Many of the statements that follow will not be completely accurate because of the limitations of the original data, but they are presented as a framework which can improved as our knowledge increases.


Gastric Cancer Esophageal Cancer Oesophageal Cancer Rough Guide Medical Audit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen-Mersh TG, Earlam RJ (1983) General surgical workload in England and Wales. Br Med J 287:1115–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Joint Committee (1975) Clinical staging system for carcinoma of the esophagus. CA 25:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Earlam RJ (1984 a) The clinical relevance of epidemiology of oesophageal cancer. In: Watson A, Celestin LR (eds) Disorders of the oesophagus. Pitman, London, pp 155–165Google Scholar
  4. Earlam RJ (1984 b) Oesophageal cancer treatment in North East Thames Region: medical audit using hospital activity analysis data (1984). Br Med J 288:1892–1894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Earlam RJ, Cunha-Melo JR (1980) Oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Br J Surg 68:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Earlam RJ, Cunha-Melo JR, Donnan SPB, Evans SJW (1982) The epidemiology of oesophageal cancer with special reference to England and Wales. Ital J Gastroenterol 14:244–249Google Scholar
  7. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1980) Cancer statistics survival England and Wales (1971–1973). HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. World Health Organisation (1979) World health statistics annual: vital statistics and cause of death. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Earlam
    • 1
  1. 1.The London HospitalWhitechapel, LondonUK

Personalised recommendations