Relations of Quantum to Classical Physics

  • Ralph Schiller
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in the Foundations Methodology and Philosophy of Science book series (FOUNDATION, volume 1)

Abstract

If, as Einstein believed, nature were not possessed of malice, then surely she would have created matter otherwise. For it is either malice or capricious ambivalence on her part which has brought us to our present state where we can say with great authority that matter is not this or that, and yet not utter a single unqualified phrase as to what it might be.

Keywords

Assure Defend Glean Aether 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    See P. G. Bergmann, Basic theories of physics — mechanics and electrodynamics (New York: Prentice Hall, Inc. 1949), Eqs. (143) and (148), p. 258–259.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bohr, N.: J. Chem. Soc. 349 (1932).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bargmann, V.: L. Michel, and V. L. Telegdi: Phys. Rev. Letters 2, 435 (1959). In the non-relativistic limit, and in a frame of reference where the electron is instantaneously at rest, the ordinary differential equations describing the spin motion are s = (e/mс) s × В.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Schrödinger, E.: Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 3, 109, 203 (1952).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Heisenberg, W.: The physical principles of the quantum theory, p. 10. New York: Dover Publ. Inc. 1930.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Böhm, D.: Phys. Rev. 84, 166 (1951), in which a similar variational principal is employed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph Schiller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsStevens Institute of TechnologyHobokenUSA

Personalised recommendations