Some Practical Aspects of Time Series Analysis

  • William T. Fox
Part of the Springer Study Edition book series (SSE)


In many geologic applications, geologic observations in a strati-graphic succession correspond to changes taking place through time. Where deposition was continuous and the rate of deposition was relatively constant, stratigraphic thickness can be considered directly proportional to time. Therefore, time-trend curves can be plotted with stratigraphic thickness corresponding to time as the independent variable and the parameter being studied as the dependent variable. The dependent variables can include such things as grain size, carbonate content, color, or fossil distribution. In modern sedimentary studies where processes are being studied through time, absolute time can be plotted as the independent variable and the dependent variables can include such things as barometric pressure, wind velocity, wave height, or current velocity.


Wave Height Wave Period Barometric Pressure Sine Curve Longshore Current 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Fox, W. T., 1964, FORTRAN and FAP program for calculating and plotting time-trend curves using an IBM 7090 or 7094/1401 computer system: Kansas Geol. Survey Spec. Dist. Pub. 12, 24.Google Scholar
  2. Fox, W. T., 1968, Quantitative paleoecologic analysis of fossil communities in the Richmond Group: Jour. Geology, v. 76, pp. 613–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fox, W. T. and Davis, R. A., Jr., 1971, Fourier analysis of weather and wave data from Holland, Michigan, July, 1970: O.N.R. Tech. Report No. 3, Contract 388–092, 79 p.Google Scholar
  4. Harbaugh, J. W., and Merriam, D. F., 1968, Computer applications in stratigraphic analysis: New York, John Wiley & Sons, 282 p.Google Scholar
  5. Kendall, M. G., 1948, The advanced theory of statistics: London, C. Griffin & Co., 503 p.Google Scholar
  6. Krumbein, W. C., and Pettijohn, F. J., 1938, Manual of sedimentary petrography: New York, Appleton-Century Co., 549 p.Google Scholar
  7. Louden, R. K., 1967, Programming the IBM 1130 and 1800: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, Inc., 433 p.Google Scholar
  8. Miller, R. L., and Kahn, J. S., 1962, Statistical analysis in the geological sciences: New York, John Wiley & Sons, 483 p.Google Scholar
  9. Preston, F. W., and Henderson, J. H., 1964, Fourier series characterization of cyclic sediments for stratigraphic correlation, in symposium on cyclic sedimentation (Merriam, D. F., ed.): Kansas Geol. Survey Bull. 169, v. 2, pp. 415–425.Google Scholar
  10. Vistelius, A. B., 1961, Sedimentation time-trend functions and their application for correlation of sedimentary deposits: Jour. Geology, v. 69, pp. 703–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Walker, R. G., and Sutton, R. G., 1967, Quantitative analysis of turbidites in the Upper Devonian Sonyea Group, New York: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 37, pp. 1012–1022.Google Scholar
  12. Walpole, R. L., and Carozzi, A. V., 1961, Microfacies study of the Rundle Group (Mississippian) of Front Ranges, Central Alberta, Canada: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 45, pp. 1810–1846.Google Scholar
  13. Weiss, M. P., Edwards, W. R., Norman, C. E., and Sharp, E. R., 1965, The American Upper Ordovician standard. VII. Stratigraphy and petrology of the Cynthiana and Eden Formations of the Ohio Valley: Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Paper 81, 76 p.Google Scholar
  14. Whittaker, E. T., and Robinson, G., 1929, The calculus of observations in A treatise of numerical mathematics (2d ed.): London, Blackie & Sons, 395 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • William T. Fox

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations