Abstract
Any transit process planning includes four basic components performed in sequence: (1) network route design; (2) setting timetables; (3) scheduling vehicles to trips; and (4) assignment of drivers. It is desirable for all components to be planned simultaneously to exploit the system’s capability to the greatest extent and to maximize the systems’s productivity and efficiency. However, this planning process is extremely cumbersome and complex, with the outcome of one fed as an input to the next component. The overview of this planning process is shown in Figure 1 with an emphasis on the three scheduling components to be adressed in this paper. The second component in Figure 1 is aimed to meet the general public transportation demand. The demand varies during the hours of the day, of the week, from one season to another and even from one year to another. This demand reflects the business, industrial, cultural, educational, social and recreational transportation needs of the community. It is the purpose of this component to set appropriate timetables for each transit route to meet the variation in the public demand. Determination of timetables is performed on the basis of passenger counts and must comply with service frequency constraints.
The transit scheduling system called OPTIBUS is comparised of three interrelated modules; (a) a timetable design module which constructs alternative computerized public timetables based on procedures which bring bus departure times in line with passenger demand; (b) a vehicle scheduling module which minimizes the number of vehicles required to carry out a fixed timetables or alternatively minimizes the total dead-heading kilometers for given number of vehicles: (c) a crew scheduling module which determines a feasible set of driver duties.
This paper gives a overview of the OPTIBUS scheduling system, as well as experience accumulated in the last three years while implementing OPTIBUS in several transit companies in Europe. The paper also describes a unique interactive full graphical optimization which leads in one implemention to save about 5 % of the operational cost.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ceder, A.: Bus Frequency Determination Using Passenger Count Data. Transportation Research 18A (1984), 439–453
Ceder, A.: Methods for Creating Bus Timetables. Transportation Research 21A (1986), 59–83
Ceder, A.; Stern, H. I.: Deficit Function Bus Scheduling with Deadheading Trip Insertion for Fleet Size Reduction. Transportation Science 15 (1981), 338–363
Ceder, A.; Stern, H. I.: The Variable Trip Procedure Used in the AUTOBUS Vehicle Scheduler. Computer Scheduling of Public Transport 2. J.M. Rousseau, ed., North-Holland; Amsterdam, New York, Oxford 1985, 371–390
Stern, H. I.; Ceder, A.: An Improved Lower Bound to the Minimum Fleet Size Problem. Transportation Science 17 (1983), 471–477
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ceder, A., Fjornes, B., Stern, H.I. (1988). OPTIBUS: A Scheduling Package. In: Daduna, J.R., Wren, A. (eds) Computer-Aided Transit Scheduling. Lecture Note in Economics Mathematical Systems, vol 308. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85966-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85966-3_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19441-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-85966-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive