Chemical Age Dating of Hydrocarbon Migration Using Uraniferous Bitumens, Czech-Polish Border Region

  • J. Parnell
Part of the Special Publication of the Society for Geology Applied to Mineral Deposits book series (MINERAL DEPOS., volume 9)

Abstract

Uraniferous bitumens from Permian rocks at Vrchlabi, Czechoslavakia, contain abundant inclusions of uraninite and also inclusions of gersdorffite. The uraninite consistently contains radiogenic lead which does not appear to have been mobilized and redistributed. Chemical age dating of large uraninite crystals yields Jurassic ages which are interpreted to represent the date of hydrocarbon migration into the rocks.

Keywords

Permian Sulphide Petroleum Arsenic Hydrocarbon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowles JFW (1990) Age dating of individual grains of uraninite in rocks from electron microprobe analyses. Chem Geol 83: 47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cadkova Z (1986) Sedimentary copper deposits in the Carboniferous and Permian. In: Bernard JH, Pouba A (eds) Ore deposits and metaliogeny of the Czechoslovak part of the Bohemian Massif. Academia Press, Prague, pp 259–260 (in Czech)Google Scholar
  3. Eakin PA (1989) Isotopic and petrographic studies of uraniferous hydrocarbons from around the Irish Sea Basin. J Geol Soc Lond 146: 663–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gize AP, Rimmer SM (1983) Mesophase development in a bitumen from the Nanisivik Mississippi Valley-type deposit. Carnegie Inst Wash Year Book 82: 414–419Google Scholar
  5. Hofmann BA (1989) Genese, Alteration and Rezentes Fliess-system der Uranlagerstätte Krunkelbach (Menzenschwand, Südschwarzwald). Nagra Tech Ber (Baden) 88–30: 1–195Google Scholar
  6. Hosek M (1988) Bitumenous shales of Krkonose piedmont basin. In: Pesek J, Vozar J (eds) Coal-bearing formations of Czechoslovakia. Dionyz Stur Institute of Geology, Bratislava, pp 171–174Google Scholar
  7. Jefferies NL (1985) Uraninite within the Carnmenellis pluton, Cornwall. In: High heat production granites, hydrothermal circulation and ore genesis. Inst Mining Metallurgy, London, pp 163–168Google Scholar
  8. Kribek B (1989) The role of organic matter in the metallogeny of the Bohemian Massif. Econ Geol 84: 1525–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Landais P, Connan J (1986) Source rock potential and oil alteration in the uraniferous basin of Lodeve ( Herault, France). Sci Geol Bull 39: 293–314Google Scholar
  10. Leventhal JS, Daws TA, Frye JS (1986) Organic geochemical analysis of sedimentary organic matter associated with uranium. Appl Geochem 1: 241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Majorowicz J, Marek S, Znosko J (1983) Paleogeothermics of central and southwestern Polish lowlands and its influence on generation and preservation of hydrocarbons. Kwartalnik Geol 27: 1–24Google Scholar
  12. Parnell J (1988) Mineralogy of uraniferous hydrocarbons in Carboniferous-hosted mineral deposits, Great Britain. Uranium 4: 197–218Google Scholar
  13. Parnell J, Eakin PA (1987) The replacement of sandstones by uraniferous hydrocarbons: significance for petroleum migration. Mineral Mag 51: 505–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parnell J, Swainbank I (1990) Pb-Pb dating of hydrocarbon migration into a bitumen-bearing ore deposit, North Wales. Geology 18: 1028–1030Google Scholar
  15. Parslow GR (1982) Chemical ages as indicators of regional uranium potential. In: Uranium exploration methods. OECD/IAEA, Paris, pp 209–215Google Scholar
  16. Rouzard JN, Oberlin A, Trichet J (1980) Interaction of uranium and organic matter in uraniferous sediments. In: Douglas AG, Maxwell JR (eds) Advances in organic geochemistry 1979. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 505–516Google Scholar
  17. Schidlowski M (1981) Uraniferous constituents of the Witwatersrand conglomerates: ore-microscopic observations and implications for the Witwatersrand metallogeny. US Geol Sury Prof Pap 1161-N: 1–29Google Scholar
  18. Suk M (1984) Geological history of the territory of the Czech Socialist Republic. Academia Press, Prague (English Edition)Google Scholar
  19. Svoboda J (1966) Regional Geology of Czechoslovakia Part 1. Bohemian Massif. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague (English Ed)Google Scholar
  20. Waples DW (1980) Time and temperature in petroleum formation — application of Lopatin’s method to petroleum exploration. Bull Am Assoc Pet Geol 64: 916–926Google Scholar
  21. Welin E (1963) The interpretation of discordant U/Pb data from central Sweden. Geol Foren Stockh Forh 85: 223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolkowicz S (1988) On the sedimentation of the Lower Permian Walchia shales from Ratno Dolne (Intra-Sudetic Depression). Przegl Geol 36: 214–218Google Scholar
  23. Wolkowicz S (1990) Uranium enrichment in the Permian organic-rich Walchia shale, Intra-Sudetic Depression, southwestern Poland. Spec Publ Int Assoc Sediment 11: 217–224Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Parnell
    • 1
  1. 1.School of GeosciencesQueen’s University of BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations