Abstract
Since the characteristic function T(r) of a function meromorphic for \( \left| z \right| < R\underline{\underline < } \infty \) increases with r, the limit
certainly exists, and there are two cases to be considered, according as T(R) = ∞ or T(R) < ∞.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H. Poincaré [2], W. Blaschke [1].
R. Nevanlinna [3].
Nonconstant, continuous functions ψ of bounded variation with a derivative that vanishes almost everywhere actually exist. A simple example of such a function can be constructed in the following way using Cantor‘s technique for the construction of perfect nowhere dense point sets (V, § 6). Distribute a positive mass h n (t) on the interval (0, t) so that one covers all 2” intervals Δ n of the approximating set E(pn) (p > 2) with a homogeneous mass of magnitude 2−n. The limit function h(t) = lim h n is a monotonic, continuous function of t that has variation 1 and whose derivative h′ vanishes for all t except for the points in the Cantor null set E(p∞).
P. Fatou [1].
Cf. e.g. H. Lebesgue [1].
For every measurable function u(ϑ) the integral (math) exists, where M is finite. As M → ∞, this integral tends to a limit that is either finite or infinite.
This holds even for nontangential approach, as can be deduced from theorems which follow.
This theorem shows that the relation T(r) = O(log r) is not only a necessary but also a sufficient condition for a meromorphic function w to be rational (cf. VI, 2,5). For then it follows that (2.1) is satisfied with q = 0. Since according to the first main theorem N(r, 0) and N(r, ∞) are likewise O (log r), the number of zeros and poles is finite, and the expression on the right in (2.2) is a rational function.
Cf. E. Borel [1], G. Valiron [3].
G. Valiron [1].
As is customary, [a] stands for the largest integer ≦ a.
The value α = − 1 would require special treatment, and for the sake of brevity we exclude it from consideration.
One has to first apply the theorem in the subregion of D 1 lying inside of |t| = R > r 1; then as R →∞, the part of the integral associated with the circle will vanish. This is also true for λ = q + 1, provided only that α < 0, which is important for what follows.
Cf. E. Lindelöf [1]. In the case λ = q, α + 1 = 0, one finds by means of a special elementary estimate that log f(z; q, — 1) ~ zλ log log z.
Cf. e.g. H. Lebescue [1].
The brothers F. and M. Riesz proved this theorem for the special case of a bounded function [1].
The following theorem was proved independently by O. Frostman [1] and the author [13] as an extension of an older theorem (R. Nevanlinna [7]).
Sharper forms of boundary value theorems have been given for special classcs of bounded functions and of functions of bounded type by O. Frostman [4] and L. Carleson [1], The boundary behavior of meromorphic functions under more general hypotheses has been investigated by E. F. Collingwood and M. L. Cartwright [1].
R. Nevanlinna [12].
Also cf. P. J. Myrberg [1].
R. Nevanlinna [12].
Taking into consideration the theorems proved above, according to which a function of bounded type has boundary values almost everywhere that form a set of positive inner capacity, the value distribution of functions of bounded type has been investigated by O. Lehto [2].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1970 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nevanlinna, R. (1970). Functions of Bounded Type. In: Eckmann, B., van der Waerden, B.L. (eds) Analytic Functions. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften in Einzeldarstellungen, vol 162. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85590-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85590-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-85592-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-85590-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive