Advertisement

Interpretation von Blutdruckselbstmeßdaten — praktische Bedeutung für Diagnostik und Medikamenten- Compliance

  • Th. Mengden
  • B. Schwartzkopff
  • B. E. Strauer

Zusammenfassung

Die Diagnose und Klassifikation von Hypertonikern beruht bislang weitgehend auf den in der ärztlichen Praxis ermittelten Blutdruckwerten gemäß den Empfehlungen der Weltgesundheitsbehörde. Aufgrund der bekannten Unzulänglichkeiten der Gelegenheitsblutdruckmessung (Praxismessung) wie z.B. dem „observer bias“haben in den letzten Jahren andere Meßtechniken wie die ambulante 24-Stunden-Blutdruckmessung und die Blutdruckselbstmessung zu Hause zunehmende Verbreitung gefunden (2–4).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Amery A, Birkenhäger W, Brixo P et al. (1985) Mortality and morbidity results from the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly trial. Lancet I: 1349–1354Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayman D, Goldshine AD (1940) Blood pressure determinations by patients with essential hypertension. Am J Med Sci 200: 465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bättig B, Steiner A, JeckT, Vetter W(1989) Blood pressure self–measurement in normotensive and hypertensive patients. J Hypertension 7 (Suppl 3 ): 59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown GE (1930) Daily and monthly rhythm in the blood pressure of a man with hypertension. Ann Intern Med 3: 1177–1189Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cramer JA, Scheyer RD, Mattson RH (1990) Compliance declines between clinic visits. Arch Intern Med 150: 1509–1510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edmonds D, Foerster E, Groth H, Greminger P, Siegenthaler W, Vetter W (1985) Does self-measurement of blood pressure improve patient compliance in hypertension? J Hypertension 3 (Suppl 1): 31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feinstein AR (1990) On white–coat effects and the electronic monitoring of compliance. Arch Intern Med 150: 1377–1378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frost & Sullivan (1990) The European Market for cardiovascular diagnostic equipment. Report: E 1304Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grüne S, Weisser B, Kraft K, Del Bufalo A, Binswanger B, Mengden T, Spühler T, Greminger P, Mocetti T, Vetter H, Vetter W (1993) Comparison of casual, ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure in a long-term study with cilazapril and atenolol. Am J Med 94 (4A): 71–74Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haynes RB (1976) A critical review of the “determinants” of patient compliance with therapeutic regimen. In: Sackett DL, Haynes RB (eds) Compliance with Therapeutic Regimens. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 27–39Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeck T, Edmonds D, Mengden T, Schubert M, Vetter W (1991) Umgang mit der Blutdruckselbstmessung—eine Patientenumfrage. Schweiz Rundschau Med (Praxis) 17: 456–461Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jeck T, Edmonds D, Mengden T, Schubert M, Renz I, Weisser B, Vetter W (1992) Beta-blocking drugs in essential hypertension: transdermal bupranolol compared with oral metoprolol. Int J Clin Pharm Res XII (3): 139–148Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lüscher T, Dorst KG, Vetter H, Scheu H, Greminger P, Haase W, Vetter W (1982) Compliance-bestimmende Faktoren bei Hypertonikern. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 112: 458–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lüscher TF, Vetter H, Siegenthaler W, Vetter W (1985) Compliance in hypertension: Facts and concepts. J Hypertension 3 (Suppl 1): 3–9Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mejia AD, Julius S, Jones KA, Schork NJ, Kneisley J (1990) The Tecumseh blood pressure study. Normative Data on blood–pressure self–determination. Arch Intern Med 150: 1209–1213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Memorandum from the WHO/ISH (1986) 1986 guidelines for the treatment of Mild Hypertension. Hypertension 8: 957–961Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mengden T, Vetter W (1991) Klinische Bedeutung der Blutdruckselbstmessung. In: Schmieder RE, Müller MH, Messerli FH (Hrsg) Endorganschäden der arteriellen Hypertonie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, S 9–15Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mengden T, Bättig B, Edmonds D, Jeck T, Huss R, Sachinidis A, Schubert M, Feltkamp H, Vetter W (1990) Self-measured blood pressures at home and during consulting hours: are there any differences? J Hypertension 8 (Suppl 3): 15–19Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mengden T, Bättig B, Vetter W (1991) Self–measurement of blood pressure improves the accuracy and reduces the number of subjects in clinical trials. J Hypertension 9 (Suppl 6): 336–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mengden T, Bättig B, Schubert M, Jeck T, Weisser B, Buddeberg C, Vetter W (1992) A comparison of casual, ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure in a study with nitrendipine v bisoprolol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 42: 569–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mengden T, Binswanger B, Jeck T, Bättig B, Weisser B, Vetter W (1992) An evaluation of self-measured blood pressure in a study with a calcium channel antagonist v a beta-blocker. Am J Hypertension 5: 154–160Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mengden T, Binswanger B, Grüne S, Spühler T, Weisser B, Vetter W (1993) The use of self-measured blood pressure determinations in assessing dynamics of drug compliance in a study with once daily morning vs evening amlodipine. J Hypertension 11: 1403–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mengden T, Weisser B, Vetter W (1994) Ambulatory 24–hour blood pressure vs self-measured blood pressure in pharmacological trials. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 24 (Suppl 2): 20–25Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pickering TG, James TG, Boddie C, Harshfield GA, Blank S, Laragh JW (1988) How common is white coat hypertension? J Am Med Ass 259: 225–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Management Committee (1980) The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension Lancet 1: 1261–1267Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    The Medical Research Council Working Party (1985) MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Br Med J 291: 97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weisser B, Mengden T, Grüne S, Spühler T, Binswanger B, Vetter W (1992) Blutdruckselbstmessung: Normale und pathologische Werte. Schweiz Rundschau (PRAXIS) 81: 111–114Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weisser B, Grüne S, Burger R, Blickenstorfer H, Iseli J, Michelsen H, Opravil R, Rageth S, Sturzenegger ER, Wlaker P, Widmer D, Vetter W (1994) The Dübendorf Study: A population-based investigation on normal values of blood pressure self-measurement. J Human Hypertension 8: 227–231Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Th. Mengden
    • 1
  • B. Schwartzkopff
    • 1
  • B. E. Strauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik B Abt. f. Kardiologie, Pneumologie und AngiologieHeinrich Heine Universität DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations