Advertisement

Partnerschaft und Liebe im Erwachsenenalter und Alter: Entwicklung in der Beziehung

  • E. Olbrich
Conference paper
Part of the Internationale Kasseler Gerontologische Gespräche book series (GERONT.GESPR., volume 1)

Zusammenfassung

Das Leben intimer Beziehung prägt Entwicklung im Erwachsenenalter entscheidend. Das gilt für die Entwicklung der Person, es gilt aber ebenso für deren Partner, Kinder, ihre Eltern und andere ihr nahestehende Menschen. Mehr als die Entwicklungspsychologie haben sich Familiensoziologie und Familienpsychologie mit Partnerschaft beschäftigt. Auf solche Arbeiten soll nachfolgend zurückgegriffen werden. Wenig findet sich in der Fachliteratur über die Liebe. Das ist verwunderlich, wird doch hier eine Kraft außer acht gelassen, die stärker als viele andere zu einem erfüllten Altern beitragen kann.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Barry WA (1970) Marriage Research and conflict: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 41–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bersheid E, Walster E (1974) Physical attractiveness. In: L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 7. Academic Press, New York 158–216Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers R (1975) Sexual attraction and love: An instrumental theory. Springfield, Ill.: C. C. ThomasGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Commins WD (1932) Marriage age of oldest sons. Journal of Social Psychology, 3: 487–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coombs RH (1966) Value consensus and partner satisfaction among dating couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 28: 166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuber JF, Harroff PB (1965) The significant Americans: A study of sexual behavior among the affluent. Appleton-Century, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis K (1964) Intermarriage in caste societies. In: R. L. Coser (ed.): The family, its structure and function. St. Martin’s Press, New York, 105–127Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dion K, Bersheid E, Walster, E (1972) What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 24: 285–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erikson EH (1970) Identität und Lebenszyklus. Suhrkamp, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flügel JC (1950) The psychoanalytic study of the family. Horbarth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gathorne-Hardy J (1982) Romantic Love. In: J. Gathorne-Hardy, Marriage, love, sex, and divorce. Summit Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gottman JM (1979) Marital interactions: Experimental investigations. New York: AcademyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guardini R, Bollnow OF (1965) Begegnung und Bildung. Würzburg: Werkbund Verlag (4. Aufl.)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harlow HF (1958) The nature of love. American Psychologist, 134: 673–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hess EH (1965) Attitudes and pupil size. Scientific American, 212: 46–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hicks MW, Platt M (1970) Marital happiness and stability: A review of research in the sixties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32: 553–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hill CT, Rubin Z, Peplau LA (1976) Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. Journal of Social Issues, 32: 147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jäckel U (1980) Partnerwahl und Eheerfolg. Stuttgart, EnkeGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jedlicka D (1980) A test of the psychoanalytic theory of mate selection. The Journal of Social Psychology, 112: 2395–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson RA (1983) We — Understanding the psychology of romantic love. San Francisco: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jung CG (1978) Die Ehe als psychologische Beziehung. In: C. G. Jung: Über die Entwicklung der Persönlichkeit. GW 17. Walter Olten, Freiburg, (3. Aufl.), 215–227Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kacerguis MA, Adams GR (1980) Erikson stage resolution: The relationship between identity and intimacy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9: 117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Katz AM, Hill R (1958) Residential propinquity and marital selection: A review of theory, method, and fact. Marriage and Family Living, 20: 27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kerckhoff AC, Davis KF (1962) Value Consensus and need complementarity in mate selection. American Sociological Review, 27: 295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kirkpatrick C (1937) Factors in Marital Adjustment. American Journal of Sociology 43, 2, 170–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levinger G (1965) Marital Cohesiveness and Dissolution: An Integrative Review. Journal of Marriage and the Family 27: 1, 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levinger G (1980) Towards an analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16: 510–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Levinger G, Senn DJ, Jorgensen, BW (1970) Progress Toward Permanence in Courtship: A Test of the Kerckhoff/Davis Hypotheses. Sociom 33: 427–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levinger G, Snoek DJ (1972) Attraction in relationship: A new look at interpersonal attraction. Morrison, N. J.: General Learning PressGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Levinger G, Snoek DJ (1977) Attraktion in Beziehungen: Eine neue Perspektive in der Erforschung zwischenmenschlicher Anziehung. In: G. Mikula und W. Stroebe (eds.) Sympathie, Freundschaft und Ehe. Huber, Bern, 108–138Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lewis RA (1972) A development framework for the analysis of premarital dyadic formation. Family process, 11: 17–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lewis RA (1973) A longitudinal test of a developmental framework for premarital dyadic formation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35: 16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lexikothek, Band 6, S. 387. Gütersloh, Berlin, München, Wien: Bertelsmann, 1973Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mandel A, Mandel KH, Stadler E, Zimmer D (1971) Einübung in Partnerschaft durch Kommunikationstherapie und Verhaltenstherapie. München: PfeifferGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Müller KV (1954). Heimatvertriebene Jugend. Kitzingen, HolzenerGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Munro B, Adams GR (1978) Love american style: A test of role structure theory on changes in attitudes toward love. Human Relations, 31: 215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Murstein BI (1976) Qualities of desired spouse: A cross-cultural comparision between French and American College students. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 7: 455–469Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Murstein BI (1980) Mate selection in the 1970s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42: 51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Murstein BI (1986) Paths to Marriage. Beverly Hills: SageGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Newman BM, Newman PR (1975) Development through life. Homewood: Dorsey PressGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Noelle E, Neumann EP (Hrsg.) (1965) Jahrbuch der öffentlichen Meinung. Bd. 1958–1964, Allensbach und Bonn; Bd. 1968–1973, Allensbach und Bonn 1974Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Orlofsky JL (1977) Sex-role orientation, identity formation, and self-esteem in college men and women. Sex roles, 3: 561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Orlofsky JL, Marcia HE, Lesser IM (1973) Ego identity status and the intimacy versus isolation crisis of young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27: 211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Parson T, Bales RF (1955) Family, Socialization, and Interaction Process. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pineo PC (1961) Disenchantment in the later years of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 23, 3–11Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pohl K (1973) Demographische Merkmale gewünschter und gewählter Ehepartner im Vergleich zu den tradierten Regeln der Partnerwahl. In H. J. Jürgens (ed.), Partnerwahl und Ehe. Hamburg: Altmann, 75–107Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reedy M, Birren J, Schaie KW (1981) Age and sex differences in satisfying love relationships across the adult life span. Human Development, 24, 52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rollins BC, Feldman H (1970) Marital Satisfaction over the Family Life Cycle. J Marr Fam 32, 1, 20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Skolnick A (1981) Married lives. Longitudinal perspectives on marriage. In: D. H. Eichhorn et al. (eds.) Present and past in middle life. New York: Academic Press, 1981, 269–298Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sternberg RJ, Barnes ML, The psychology of love. New Haren and London, Yale Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Strauss A (1946) The influence of parent-images upon marital choice. American Sociological Review, 11: 554–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tharp RG (1963) Psychological patterning in marriage. Psychological Bulletin, 60: 97–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    US Bureau of the Census (1985) Marital status and living arrangements, March 1984. Current Population Reports (P 20, No 390). Washington DC: Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Warren BL (1966) A multiple variable approach to the assortive mating phenomenon. Eugenics Quarterly, 13: 285–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Waterman CK, Nevid JS (1977) Sex differences in the resolution of the identity crisis. Journal of youth and adolescence, 6: 337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Whitbourne SK, Weinstock CS (1982) Die mittlere Lebensspanne. München: Urban & SchwarzenbergGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Willi J (1982) Die Zweierbeziehung: Reinbeck: Rowohlt (zweite Auflage)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Winch RD (1958) Mate selection: A study of complementary needs. New York: HarperGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Olbrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für PsychologieUniversität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations