Pitch as an Emerging Percept

  • Marc Leman
Part of the Springer Series in Information Sciences book series (SSINF, volume 31)

Abstract

This chapter is about the decline of the traditional phenomenological approach to pitch perception. Auditory experiments with ambiguous stimuli provide arguments in favour of a model in which pitch is seen as an emerging outcome from auditory information processing, rather than in terms of phenomenological attributes.

Keywords

Tral Acoustics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 3.1
    E. Burns: Circularity in relative pitch judgments for inharmonic complex tones - the Shepard demonstration revisited again. Percept. Psychophys. 30, 467–472 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.2
    D. Deutsch: A musical paradox. Music Perception 3, 275–280 (1986)Google Scholar
  3. 3.3
    D. Deutsch: The tritone paradox - an influence of language on music perception. Music Perception 8, 335–347 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 3.4
    D. Deutsch, R.C. Boulanger: Octave equivalence and the immediate recall of pitchsequences. Music Perception 2, 40–51 (1984)Google Scholar
  5. 3.5
    D. Deutsch, W.L. Kuyper, Y. Fisher: The tritone paradox - its presence and form of distribution in a general population. Music Perception 5, 79–92 (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 3.6
    D. Deutsch, T. North, L. Ray: The tritone paradox - correlate with the listener’s vocal range for speech. Music Perception 7, 371–384 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 3.7
    A. Forte: The Structure of Atonal Music (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT 1973)Google Scholar
  8. 3.8
    M. Leman: Symbolic and subsymbolic description of music. In Music Processing, ed. by G. Haus. (A-R Editons, Madison, Wisconsin 1993)Google Scholar
  9. 3.9
    M.V. Mathews:The Technology of Computer Music (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1969)Google Scholar
  10. 3.10
    M.V. Mathews, R. Pierce, A. Reeves, L.A. Roberts: Theoretical and experimental explorations of the Bohlen-Pierce scale. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 1214–1222 (1988)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 3.11
    J. Nakajima, H. Minami, T. Tsumura, H. Kunisaki, S. Ohnishi, R. Teranishi: Dynamic pitch perception for complex tones of periodic spectral patterns. Music Perception 8, 291–314 (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 3.12
    Y. Nakajima, T. Tsumura, S. Matsuura, H. Minami, R. Teranishi: Dynamic pitch perception for complex tones derived from major triads. Music Perception 6, 1–20 (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 3.13
    G. Révész: Inleiding tot de Muziekpsychologie (N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij, Amsterdam 1944)Google Scholar
  14. 3.14
    J. Risset: Hauteur et timbre des sons. Technical Report IRC AM Nr. 11 (Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris 1978)Google Scholar
  15. 3.15
    R.N. Shepard: Circularity in judgments of relative pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 2346–2353 (1964)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 3.16
    K. Ueda, K. Ohgushi: Perceptual components of pitch - spatial representation using a multidimensional scaling technique. J. Acoust Soc. Am. 82, 11931203 (1987)Google Scholar
  17. 3.17
    L. van Noorden: Two channel pitch perception. In Music, Mind and Brain - the Neuropsychology of Music, ed. by M. Clynes (Plenum Press, London 1982)Google Scholar
  18. 3.18
    G. von Bismarck: Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds. Acustica 30, 159–172 (1974)Google Scholar
  19. 3.19
    G. von Bismarck: Timbre of steady sounds - a factorial investigation of its verbal attributes.Acustica 30, 146–159 (1974)Google Scholar
  20. 3.20
    E. Zwicker, H. Fasti: Psychoacoustics - Facts and Models (Springer Ser. Inf. Sci., Vol. 22, Berlin, Heidelberg 1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Leman
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic MusicUniversity of GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations