Skip to main content

The Indispensability of Externality Valuation in Least-Cost Planning

  • Conference paper
Social Costs of Energy

Abstract

Utility regulators have been expanding the range of costs included in evaluating utility decisions such as the selection of new supply sources or the analysis of conservation programs. In addition to known direct costs to the utilities, regulators are including various allowances for risks and for environmental and economic externalities. Considerable controversy has arisen regarding the inclusion of environmental externalities and the specific methods used in setting externality values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chernick, P. and Caverhill, E., “Monetizing Externalities in Utility Regulations: The Role of Control Costs,” Proceedings from the NARUC National Conference on Environmental Externalities; October 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernick, P. and Caverhill, E., “Externalities,” in From Here to Efficiency, Pennsylvania Energy Office, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernick, P. and Schoenberg, J., “Determining the Marginal Value of Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Energy Developments in the 1990s: Challenges Facing Global/Pacific Markets, International Association for Energy Economics, July 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destribats, A.F., Hutchinson, M.A., Stout, T.M., and White, D.S., “Environmental Costs and Resource Plannng Consequences: New England Electric’s Rating and Weighting Approach,” NARUC Externalities Conference, October 1,1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Policy Coordinating Committee (IPCC), “Climate Change,” The IPCC Response Strategies, Island PRess, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, Paul L., “Dealing with Environmental Externalities: Let’s do it Right!,” Edison Electric Institute Strategic Planning Department #61,1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, F., et al., “Incorporating Global Warming Risks in Power Sector Planning — A Case Study of the New England Region,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Draft March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, M. “The Problem with Externalities,” Electrical World, May 1992, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, Decision in Docket No. 89–239, August 31, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J.W., Abstract of Testimony in U.S. House of Representatives Hearing on Domestic and International Climate Change Policy, New England Electric Systems, March 3,1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chernick, P., Birner, S. (1994). The Indispensability of Externality Valuation in Least-Cost Planning. In: Hohmeyer, O., Ottinger, R.L. (eds) Social Costs of Energy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85120-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85120-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-85122-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-85120-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics