Abstract
Redundancy of a structural system is defined as the capability of the system to carry additional loads after the failure of one or more of its components. Research studies to include redundancy in the U.S. bridge design and evaluation codes are underway. These efforts are based on calibrating system factors that could be added to the checking equations. The purpose of these system factors is to “reward” redundant designs by allowing savings in required member capacities, and “penalize” nonredundant designs by requiring their members to be more conservative. The calibration process uses a target redundancy index as the safety criterion that bridges should satisfy. The redundancy index is defined as the difference between the reliability index of the bridge system and the reliability index of the members. This paper illustrates the method proposed to calculate the redundancy indices of typical bridges. The member safety index is calculated, as traditionally done, using the results of an elastic analysis of the bridge. The system reliability index accounts for the nonlinear behavior of the bridge system and the redistribution of the applied loads after the failure of a member. In this paper, the response function (response surface) method is used to calculate the system safety indices of typical multi-beam steel and prestressed concrete bridges. System factors are then calibrated to reflect the level of redundancy that different bridge configurations possess.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ghosn, M. and Moses F., Redundancy in Highway Bridge Superstructures, Draft Final Report, NCHRP 12–36, September 1993.
Moses, F., Khedekar, N, and Ghosn, M., System Reliability of Redundant Structures Using Response Functions, ICOSSAR 93, Innsbruck, Austria, August 1993.
Augusti, G., Baratta, A. and Casciati, R, Probabilistic Methods in Structural Engineering, Chapman Hall, New York, 1984.
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, AASHTO, Washington DC, 1989.
Kulicki, J.M., Development of Comprehensive Bridge Specification and Commentary, NCHRP 12–33, Draft Report, March 1993.
Nowak, A.S., Calibration of LRFD Bridge Design Code, NCHRP project 12–33, May 1992.
Naaman, A.E., Harajali, M.H., and Wight, J.K., Analysis of Ductility in Partially Prestressed Concrete Flexural Members, PCI Journal, V. 31, No. 3, May-June 1986.
Schilling, C.G., A Unified Autostress Method, Report 51, American Iron and Steel Institute, November 1989.
U.S. Steel Highway Bridge Design Manual. US Steel, Pittsburgh, PA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ghosn, M., Moses, F., Khedekar, N. (1994). Response Functions and System Reliability of Bridges. In: Spanos, P.D., Wu, YT. (eds) Probabilistic Structural Mechanics: Advances in Structural Reliability Methods. International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85092-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85092-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-85094-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-85092-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive