Simulation and Optimization In Flow Planning and Management
Most of the aviation technical community is familiar with, “What if…”, the typical question associated with simulation modeling. A simulation normally evaluates a series of proposed action plans, or scenarios, in which a computer program mimics reality by stepping through all interacting events as they happen. What happens depends of course on suggested strategies being modeled. By analyzing the aftermath, by being abl’e to have a vision of what would happen should a scheme be implemented, planners can identify sensible solutions to problems. Computer simulation, by playing out a scenario to its end, can capture nearly all the complex interactions that would take place in real life, interactions too numerous to anticipate by routine thought processes. Thus figuratively, simulation provides a crystal ball view of the future that is beyond ordinary human insight.
KeywordsTraffic Flow Traffic Demand Traffic Management Federal Aviation Administration Flight Plan
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bellman, R.E. and Dreyfus, S.E., “Optimum Trajectories”,Applied Dynamic Programming, Chapter 8, Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
- Collins, B.P., “Estimation of Fuel Consumption of Commercial Jet Aircraft from Path Profile Data”, Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper 800746, International Air Transportation Meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio, May 20–22, 1980.Google Scholar
- Collins, B.P., Ford, D.W., and Bell, N.J., “Concepts for Aviation Fuel Efficiency”, Proceedings of the Aviation Fuel Conservation Symposium, FAA, Washington, DC, September 10–11 1984.Google Scholar
- Collins, B. P., and Manning, W., “Dynamic Traffic Flow Planning for ATC and Airspace User Requirements”, 1991 Winter Simulation Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, December 8–11, 1991.Google Scholar
- Cosby, Mark, “Breakthroughs in the Application of Simulation to Aviation Planning”, Simulation Conference 17 (CACI, Federal Aviation Administration, Society for Computer Simulation), Arlington, Virginia, August 25–27, 1992.Google Scholar
- Ford, D.W., Collins, B.P., and Bell, N.J., “Fuel Efficient Operations in the Oceanic Area”, Proceedings of the Aviation Fuel Conservation Symposium, FAA, Washington, DC, September 10–11 1984.Google Scholar
- FSL Forum, “Profiler Network Status”, NOAA/ERL Forecast System Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, February, 1991.Google Scholar
- True, H.C. and Winer, D.E., “Meteorological Data Requirements for Fuel Efficient Flight”, Ninth Conference on Aerospace and Aeronautical Meteorology, Omaha, Nebraska, June 6–9, 1983.Google Scholar
- Winer, D.E., and Hoch, C.J., “Energy Conservation in Terminal Airspace through Fuel Consumption Modeling”, Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper 800745, International Air Transportation Meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio, May 20–22, 1980.Google Scholar
- Winer, D.E., “Existing Wind Observation Network”, Sixth Annual Workshop on Meteorological Inputs to Aviation Systems, University of Tennessee Space Institute, Tullahoma, Tennessee, October 27, 1982.Google Scholar
- The Federal Aviation Administration Plan for Research, Engineering and Development, Chapter 2.1, “Capacity and ATM Technology Project”Google Scholar