Immunocytochemistry in Diagnostic Cytology

  • P. Dalquen
  • G. Sauter
  • R. Epper
  • B. Kleiber
  • G. Feichter
  • F. Gudat
Part of the Recent Results in Cancer Research book series (RECENTCANCER, volume 133)

Abstract

Immunocytochemistry is now a well-established tool for tumor typing in surgical pathology. However, in diagnostic cytology it has not yet been generally accepted. Koss (1990) says that “. . . the staining of cytologie preparations with a battery of antibodies to the various cell components or products is very costly and rarely rewarding,. . . the results of immunocytochemistry vary according to the batch of antibodies and the technical skills of the laboratories, the interpretation of the results is not always easy, and the problem with borderline positive stains is often perplexing.” Other authors (Chess and Hajdu 1986; van Flens et al. 1990; Mason and Bedrossian 1986), too, are not as enthusiastic as some of the pioneering cytolgists (Nadij 1980). Chess and Hajdu (1986) found only 63% positive reactions and 88% negative reactions to be in agreement with the cytologie diagnosis, Van Flens et al. (1990) estimated that immunocytochemistry contributed to diagnosis in about 50% of cases.

Keywords

Acetone Estrogen Tuberculosis Sarcoma Tamoxifen 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albera C, Mabritto I, Ghio P, Scagliotti GV, Pozzi E (1991) Lymphocyte sub-populations analysis in pleural fluid and peripheral blood in patients with lym-phocytic pleural effusions. Respiration 58: 65–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmannsberger M (1988) Intermediärfilamentproteine als Marker in der Tumor diagnostic. Veröff Pathol 127: 1–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Altmannsberger M, Dralle H, Weber K, Osborn M, Dröse M (1987) Intermediate filaments in cytological specimens of thyroid tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 3: 210–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks P, Caron BL, Morgan TW (1983) Use of imprints for monoclonal antibody studies: suitability of air-dried preparations from lymphoid tissue with an im-munohistochemical method. Am J Clin Pathol 79: 438–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bedrossian CW, Davila RM, Merenda G (1989) Immunocytochemical evaluation of liver fine-needle aspirations. Arch Pathol Lab Med 113: 1225–1230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeron C, Shatz P, Margolese R, Major P, Ferenczy A (1989) Immunohisto-chemical studies with monoclonal antibodies B72.3 and MA5 on histologie and cytologie specimens from benign and malignant breast lesions. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11: 33–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockmann M, Brockmann I, Fischer M, Müller K-M (1990) Reactive lesions of the pleura; immunohistochemical characterization. Pathol Res Pract 186: 238–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown DC, Gatter KC, Dumnill MS, Mason DY (1989) Immunocytochemical analysis of cytocentrifuged fine needle aspirates. A study based on lung tumors aspirated in vitro. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11: 140–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruderman I, Cohen R, Leitner O, Ronah R, Guber A, Griffel B, Geiger B (1990) Immunocytochemical characterization of lung tumors in fine-needle aspiration. The use of cytokeratin monoclonal antibodies for the differential diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Cancer 66: 1817–1827Google Scholar
  10. Carrozza MJ, Calafati SA, Edmonds PR (1991) Immunocytochemical localization of polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen in hepatocellular carcinomas. Acta Cytol 35: 221–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandra M, Nayar M (1990) Fc-receptors in the differentiation of mesothelial cells-from malignant cells in effusions. Acta Cytol 34: 582–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chess Q, Hajdu SI (1986) The role of immunoperoxydase staining in diagnostic cytology. Acta Cytol 30: 1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chheda H, Clarke RE (1986) Immunocytochemistry: its use in the diagnosis of epithelial malignancy in serous effusions. Acta Cytol 30: 586Google Scholar
  14. Coakham HB, Brownell B, Harper EI, Garson JA, Allen PM, Lane EB, Kemshead JT (1984) Use of monoclonal antibody panel to identify malignant cells in cere-brospinal fluid. Lancet 1: 1095–1097PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conway de Macario E, Macario AJ, Jovell RJ (1986) Slide immunoenzymatic assay for human IgE (SIA-IgE). J Immunol Methods 90: 137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalquen P (1986) Diagnostischer Wert der Feinnadelpunktion (FNP) bei zervikalen Lymphknotenschwellungen. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 70: 532–533Google Scholar
  17. Dalquen P, Bittel D, Gudat F, von Overbeck J, Heitz PU (1986) Combined im-munoreaction and Papanicolaou’s stain on cytological smears. Pathol Res Pract 181: 50–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daste G, Serre G, Mauduyt MA, Vincent C, Caveriviere P, Soleilhavoup JP (1991) Immunophenotyping of mesothelial cells and carcinoma cells with monoclonal antibodies to cytokeratins, vimentin, CEA and EMA improves the cytodiagnosis of serous effusions. Cytopathology 2: 19–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deligeorgi-Politi H, Bartziota EV, Mavrogeorgis A, Sekeris CE (1990) Determination of estrogen receptors in cytologie imprints of breast cancers using im-munocytochemical methods. Acta Cytol 34: 851–884Google Scholar
  20. Devleeschouwer N, Faverly D, Kiss R, Legros N, de Ryckaert LY, Andry M, Lenglet G, Paridaens R, Gompel CM (1988) Comparison of biochemical and im-munoenzymatic macromethods and a new immunocytochemical micromethod for assaying estrogen receptors in human breast carcinomas. Acta Cytol 32: 816–824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dinges HP, Wirnsberger G, Hofler H (1989) Immunocytochemistry in cytology. Comparative evaluation of different techniques. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11: 22–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Domagala W, Lasota J, Chosia M, Weber K, Osborn M (1989a) Leukocyte-common antigen and vimentin are reliable adjuncts in the diagnosis of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in fine needle aspirates. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11: 15–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Domagala W, Lasota J, Weber K, Osborn M (1989b) Endothelial cells help in the diagnosis of primary versus metastatic carcinoma of the liver in fine needle aspirates. An immunofluorescence study with vimentin and endothelial cell-specific antibodies. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11: 8–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Duggan MA, Masters CB, Alexander F (1987) Immunohistochemical differentiation of malignant mesothelioma, mesothelial hyperplasia and metastatic adenbear-cinoma in serous effusions, utilizing staining for carcinoembryonic antigen, keratin and vimentin. Acta Cytol 31: 807–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Elias JM (1990) Immunohistopathology. A practical approach. ASCP Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Epenetos AA, Canti G, Taylor-Papadimitriou J, Curling M, Bodmer WF (1982) Use of two epithelium-specific monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis of malignancy in serous effusions. Lancet 2: 1004–1006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Esteban JM, Yokota S, Husain S, Battifora H (1990) Immunocytochemical profile of benign and carcinomatous effusions. A practical approach to difficult diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol 94: 698–705PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ghosh AK, Spriggs AI, Taylor-Papadimitriou J, Mason DY (1983) Immunocytochemical staining of cells in pleural and peritoneal effusions with a panel of monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Pathol 36: 1154–1164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gosh AK, Spriggs AI, Charnock M (1986) Use of immunocytochemical staining to identify cells in peritoneal fluid and washings at laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Clin Pathol 39: 1335–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guzman J, Costabel U, Bross KJ, Wiehel U, Grunert F, Schäfer HE (1988) The value of the immunoperoxydase slide assay in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions in breast cancer. Acta Cytol 32: 188–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Guzman J, Bross KJ, Würtemberger G, Costabel U (1989) Immunocytology in malignant pleural mesothelioma; expression of tumor markers and distribution of lymphocyte subsets. Chest 95: 590–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guzman J, Bross KJ, Costabel U (1990a) Malignant pleural effusion due to small cell carcinoma of the lung: an immunocytochemical cell-surface analysis of lymphocytes and tumor cells. Acta Cytol 34: 497–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Guzman J, Kraft A, Bross KJ, Würtemberger G, Costabel U (1990b) Immunzyto-chemische Charakterisierung maligner Pleuraergüsse beim kleinzelligen Bron-chialkarzinom. Pneumologie 44: 601–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H (1981) The use of avidin-biotin-peroxydase complex in immunoperoxydase techniques. Am Clin Rathol 75: 816–861Google Scholar
  35. Judd MA, Britten KJM (1982) Tissue preparation for the demonstration of surface antigens by immunoperoxydase techniques. Histochem J 14: 747–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kline TS, Kannan V, Kline IK (1984) Lymphadenopathy and aspiration biopsy cytology; review of 376 superficial nodes. Cancer 54: 1076–1081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koss L (1990) The future of cytology. The Wachtel lecture for 1988. Acta Cytol 34: 1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuhlmann L, Berghauser KH, Schaffer R (1991) Distinction of mesothelioma from carcinoma in pleural effusions. An immunocytochemical study on routinely processed cytoblock preparations. Pathol Res Pract 187: 467–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kung ITM, Chan S-K, Lo ESF (1990) Application of the immunoperoxydase technique to cell block preparations from fine needle aspirates. Acta Cytol 34: 297–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kyrkou KA, Iatridis SG, Athanassiadou PP, Emmanuilidou AG, Athanassiadis PP (1985) Detection of benign or malignant origin of aszites with combined indirect imuunoperoxydase assay of carcinoembrionic antigen and lysozyme. Acta Cytol 29: 57–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Leenen PJM, Jansen AMA, Van Ewijk W (1985) Fixation parameters for immuno-cytochemistry. The effect of glutaraldehyde or (para)formaldehyde fixation on the preservation of mononuclear phagocyte differentiation antigens. In: Bullock GR, Petrusz P (Eds) Techniques in immunocytochemistry, Vol. III. Academic, New York, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  42. Levitt S, Cheng L, DuPuis MH, Layfield LJ (1985) Fine needle aspiration diagnosis of malignant lymphoma with confirmation by immunoperoxydase staining. Acta Cytol 29: 895–902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Li C-Y, Lazcano-Villareal O, Pierre RV, Yam LT (1987) Immunocytochemical identification of cells in serous effusions; technical considerations. Am J Clin Pathol 88: 696–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Li C-Y, Ziesmer SC, Wong Y-C, Yam LT (1989) Diagnostic accuracy of the immunocytochemical study of body fluids. Acta Cytol 33: 667–673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lopez-Cärdozo P (1980) The significance of fine needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant lymphomas. Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  46. Lozowski W, Hajdu SI (1987) Cytology and immunocytochemistry of bronchioloal-veolar carcinoma. Acta Cytol 31: 717–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin SE, Moshiri S, Thor A, Vilasi V, Chu EW, Schlom J (1986) Identification of adenocarcinoma in cytospin preparations of effusions using monoclonal antibody B72.3. Am J Clin Pathol 86: 10–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mason M, Bedrossian CWM (1986) Value of immunocytochemistry in the study of malignant effusions (abstract). Acta Cytol 30: 569Google Scholar
  49. Moch H et al. (1992) Immunohistochemical differentiation between malignant mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma. A study on 60 cases. Virch Arch A (in press)Google Scholar
  50. Nadij M (1980) The potential value of immunoperoxydase techniques in diagnostic cytology. Acta Cytol 24: 442–447Google Scholar
  51. Neunteufel W, Breitenecker G (1992) Distribution and localisation of Cal25, CA 19-9 and CE A in 91 ovarian tumors: an immunohistochemical study. J Tumor-marker Oncol 1: 99–108Google Scholar
  52. Ordonez NG (1989) The immunohistochemical diagnosis of mesothelioma. Differentiation of mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 13: 276–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ordonez NG, Sneige N, Hickey RC, Brooks TE (1988) Use of monoclonal antibody HMB-45 in the cytologie diagnosis of melanoma. Acta Cytol 32: 684–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Orell SR, Dowling KD (1983) Oncofetal antigens as tumor markers in the cytologie diagnosis of effusions. Acta Cytol 27: 625–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Osamura RY, Watanabe K, Yamamoto Y (1986) Immunocytochemical staining of carcinoembryonic antigen on cytologie smears. Acta Cytoll 30: 88–90Google Scholar
  56. Permanetter W, Wiesinger H (1987) Immunocytochemical study of lysozyme, alphal-anti-chymotrypsin, tissue polypeptide antigen, keratin and carcinoembryonic antigen in effusion sediments. Acta Cytoll 31: 104–112Google Scholar
  57. Polak JM, van Noorden S (1983) Immunocytochemistry. Practical applications in pathology and Biology. Wright PSG, BristolGoogle Scholar
  58. Ramaekers F, Haag D, Jap P, Vooijs PG (1984) Immunochemcal demonstration of keratin and vimentin in cytologie aspirates. Acta Cytol 28: 385–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sheibani K, Battifora HJSB (1986) Antigenic phenotype of malignant mesothe-liomas: an immunohistologic analysis demonstrating the value of Leu Ml antigen. Am J Pathol 123: 212–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sheibani K, Shin SS, Kezirian J (1991) Ber-Ep4 antibody as a discriminant in the differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma versus adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 15: 779–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Spieler P, Kradolfer D, Schmid U (1986) Immunocytochemical characterization of lymphocytes in benign and malignant lymphocyte-rich serous effusions. Virchows Arch (Pathol Anat) 409: 211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sternberger LA (1986) Immunocytochemistry, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Szpak CA, Johnston WW, Lottich SC, Kufe D, Thor A, Schlom J (1984) Patterns of reactivity of four novel monoclonal antibodies (B72.3, DF3, B1.1 and B6.2) with cells in human malignant and benign effusions. Acta Cytoll 28: 356–367Google Scholar
  64. Szpak CA, Thor A, Schlom J, Soper JT, Johnston WW (1987) Detection of adenocarcinoma in peritoneal washings by monoclonal antibody B72.3. Acta Cytol 31: 649–650Google Scholar
  65. Tello JW, Johnston WW (1989) A comparative study of the immunoperoxydase and immunoalkaline phosphatase staining methods using monoclonal antibodies B72.3 and antikeratin AE1,3 on cytocentrifuge specimens (abstract). Acta Cytoll 33: 725Google Scholar
  66. Thomas WN, Green LK, Mayberry L (1989) The application of immunoperoxydase staining to fine needle aspirates of the liver: a review of 60 cases (abstract). Acta Cytol 33: 719Google Scholar
  67. Tickman RJ, Cohen C, Varma, VA, Fekete PS, DeRose PB (1990) Distinction between carcinoma cells and mesothelial cells in serous effusions; usefulness of immunocytochemistry. Acta Cytoll 34: 491–496Google Scholar
  68. To A, Coleman DV, Dearnaley DP, Ormerod MG, Steele K, Neville AM (1981) Use of antisera to epithelial membrane antigen for the cytodiagnosis of malignancy in serous effusions. J Clin Pathol 34: 1326–1332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. To A, Dearnaley DP, Ormerod MG, Canti G, Coleman D (1983) Indirect immunoalkaline phosphatase staining of cytologie smears of serous effusions for tumor marker studies. Acta Cytoll 27: 109–113Google Scholar
  70. Vielh P, Magdelénat H, Mosseri V, Remvikos Y, di Bonito L (1992) Immunocytochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptors on 50 fine-needle samples of breast cancer. A prospective study including biochemical correlation and DNA flow cytometric analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 97: 254–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Groonen AMdVP, Herman CJ, Lindeman J (1988) Cytology immunopathology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of pleural and peritoneal effusions. Lab Invest 58: 725–732Google Scholar
  72. Van Flens MJdVP, Tadema TM, Huysmans AC, Risse EK, van Meijer TGA, Meijer CJ (1990) The contribution of immunocytochemistry in diagnostic cytology. Comparison and evaluation with immunohistology. Cancer 65: 2704–2711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wadsley JJ, Watt RM (1987) The effect of pH on the aggregation of biotinylated antibodies and on the signal-to-noise observed in immunoassays utilizing biotinylated antibodies. J Immunol Methods 103: 1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walts AE, Said JW (1983) Specific tumor markers in diagnostic cytology: immunoperoxydase studies of carcinoembryonic antigen, lysozyme and other tissue antigens in effusions, washes and aspirates. Acta Cytol 27: 408–416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Wan JH, Sykes PJ, Orell SR, Morley AA (1992) Rapid method for detecting monoclonality in B cell lymphoma in lymph node aspirates using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Pathol 45: 420–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang N-S, Huang S-N, Gold P (1979) Absence of carcinoembryonic antigen-like material in mesothelioma. An immunohistochemical differentiation from other lung cancers. Cancer 44: 937–943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wick MR, Loy T, Mills SE, Legier JF, Manivel JC (1990) Malignant epithe-loid pleural mesothelioma versus peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinoma: a histi-chemical, ultrastructural, and immunohistologic study of 103 cases. Hum Pathol 21: 759–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yam LT (1990) Immunocytochemistry of fine needle aspirates. A tactical approach. Acta Cytol 34: 789–796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Yam LT, English MC, Janckila AJ, Ziesmer S, Li CY (1987) Immuncytochemistry of cerebrospinal fluid. Acta Cytol 31: 825–833PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Zajicek J (1974) Aspiration biopsy cytology, part 1: cytology of supradiaphragmatic organs. Monogr Clin Cytol 4: 98–99Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Dalquen
    • 1
  • G. Sauter
    • 1
  • R. Epper
    • 1
  • B. Kleiber
    • 1
  • G. Feichter
    • 1
  • F. Gudat
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Pathology, Division of CytologyUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations