Advertisement

In-Flight Flow Visualization Results from High Angle of Attack Tests on a Forward Swept Wing Aircraft with Comparisons to Water Tunnel Results

  • John H. Del Frate
Conference paper

Abstract

Asymmetries in the vortical flow generated by the long forebody of the X-29 aircraft were suspected of causing uncommanded yawing moments at high-angles of attack. A smoke flow visualization technique was used to visualize the forebody vortices and to correlate any asymmetries observed with flight yawing moment data. This paper presents a method of analyzing smoke flow visualization data for comparison with asymmetric aircraft moments or forces. Good agreement was found between the forebody vortex asymmetries and uncommanded yawing moments.

Keywords

Flow Visualization Angular Position Vortex System Local Timing Standard Side Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Webster, Frederick R. and Dana Purifoy, “X-29 High Angle-of-Attack Flying Qualities, ” AFFTCTR-91-15, July 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher, D. F., R. E. Curry, J. H. Del Frate, and D. M. Richwine, “In-Flight Flow Visualization Techniques on a Vortex-Lift Fighter Aircraft, ” Flow Visualization V; Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium, Prague, Czechoslovakia, Aug. 21–25, 1989. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, NY, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richwine, David M., Robert E. Curry, and Gene V. Tracy, “A Smoke Generator System for Aerodynamic Flight Research, ” NASA TM-4137, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisher, David F., John H. Del Frate, and David M. Richwine, “In-Flight Flow Visualization Characteristics of the NASA F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle at High Angles of Attack, ” NASA TM-4193, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Del Frate, John H. and J. A. Saltzman, “In-Flight Flow Visualization Results from the X-29 Aircraft at High Angles of Attack, ” AIAA 92-4102, Aug. 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moore, M. and D. Frei, “X-29 Forward Swept Wing Aerodynamic Overview, ” AIAA 83-1834, July 1983.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keener, Earl R., “Flow Separation Patterns on Symmetric Forebodies, ” NASA TM-86016, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grafton, Sue B., Joseph R. Chambers, and Paul L. Coe, Jr., “Wind — Tunnel Free-Flight Investigation of a Model of a Spin-Resistant Fighter Configuration, ” NASA TN D-7716, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skow, A. M. and G. E. Erickson, “Modern Fighter Aircraft Design for High Angle-of-Attack Maneuvering,” AGARD-LS-121, Dec. 1982, pp. 4-1 to 4-59.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klein, Vladislav, Brent R. Cobleigh, and Keith D. Noderer, “Lateral Aerodynamic Parameters of the X-29 Aircraft Estimated From Flight Data at Moderate to High Angles of Attack, ” NASA TM-104155, 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. Del Frate
    • 1
  1. 1.NASA Dryden Flight Research FacilityEdwardsUSA

Personalised recommendations