Skip to main content

Quantum Interference in Ballistic Cavities: Conductance Fluctuations and Weak Localization

  • Conference paper
Transport Phenomena in Mesoscopic Systems

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences ((SSSOL,volume 109))

  • 442 Accesses

Abstract

We summarize recent work showing that transport through ballistic cavities is strongly influenced by quantum interference effects. We find both large conductance fluctuations as a function of either magnetic field or wavevector and a substantial weak-localization correction. Both of these effects result from the interference among the complicated trapped paths in the cavity. Using semiclassical arguments, we demonstrate a connection between the classical dynamics in these systems and the quantum conductance properties: the mean area enclosed by a classical trajectory characterizes both the magnetic-field correlation length and the width in field of the weak-localization magnetoconductance. Further, we note a qualitative difference between regular and chaotic geometries in their weak-localization behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. For reviews see C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten in Solid State Physics, Vol. 44, edited by H. Ehrenreich and D. Turnbull (Academic Press, New York, 1991) pp. 1–228 and B. L. Altshuler, P. A. Lee, and R. A. Webb, eds., Mesoscopic Phenomena in Solids (North-Holland, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. L. Eoukes, A. Scherer, S. J. Allen, Jr., H. G. Craighead, R. M. Ruthen, E. D. Beebe, and J. P. Harbison, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 3011 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Timp, H. U. Baranger, P. deVegvar, J. E. Cunningham, R. E. Howard, R. Behringer, and P. M. Mankiewich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2081 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Takagaki, K. Gamo, S. Namba, S. Ishida, S. Takaoka, K. Murase, K. Ishibashi, and Y. Aoyagi, Solid State Commun. 68, 1051 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. J. van Wees, H. van Houten, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. van der Marel, and C. T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. A. Wharam, T. J. Thornton, R. Newbury, M. Pepper, H. Ajmed, J. E. F. Frost, D. G. Hasko, D. C. Peacock, D. A. Ritchie, and G. A. C. Jones, J. Phys. C 21, L209 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Behringer, G. Timp, H. U. Baranger, and J. E. Cunningham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 930 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. U. Baranger, D. P. DiVincenzo, R. A. Jalabert, and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. B 44, 10637 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. A. Jalabert, H. U. Baranger and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2442 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. U. Baranger and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 414 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. For a recent review of issues in “quantum chaos” see M. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer Verlag, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. O. Bohigas, M.-J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1 (1984); M. V. Berry, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 400, 229 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. A. Brody, J. Flores, J. B. French, P. A. Mello, A. Pandey and S. S. M. Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 385 (1981) and refs. therein.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. C. Gutzwiller, Physica D 7, 341 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Blümel and U. Smilansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 477 (1988); 64, 241 (1990); Physica D 36, 111 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Doron, U. Smilansky, and A. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3072 (1990); Physica D 50, 367 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C. H. Lewenkopf and H. A. Weidenmüller, Annals of Phys. 212, 53 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Jung and H.-J. Schok, J. Phys. A 20, 3607 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Eckhardt, J. Phys. A 20, 5971 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Tél, J. Phys. A. 22, L691 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Gaspard and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 2225 (1989);90, 2242 (1989); 90, 2255 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Bleher, E. Ott, and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 919 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. L. Roukes and O. L. Alerhand, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1651 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. U. Baranger, R. A. Jalabert, and A. D. Stone, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Landauer, IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 233 (1957); Z. Phys. B 68, 217 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1761 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C. W. J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1857 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. U. Baranger and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. B 40, 8169 (1989) and references tlierein.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. C. Gutzwiller, Ref. [11], pp. 184–190, 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  30. The direct paths are not properly treated in Eq. (3) since s becomes infinite in the second stationary phase integration; a correct treatment will be given in Ref. [24].

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. A. Jalabert, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 36, 743 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  32. See related work by R. B. S. Oakeshott and A. MacKinnon, Superlat. and Microstruc. 11, 145 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. H. Hannay, in Chaotic Behavior in Quantum Systems: Theory and Applications, edited by G. Casati (Plenum, New York, 1983) p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  34. For the use of uniformity assumptions in the case of closed billiards see [33] and J. H. Hannay and A. M. Ozorio De Almeida, J. Phys. A. 17, 3429 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. P. A. Mello and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. B 44, 3559 (1991), see Eq. (4.14).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baranger, H.U., Jalabert, R.A., Stone, A.D. (1992). Quantum Interference in Ballistic Cavities: Conductance Fluctuations and Weak Localization. In: Fukuyama, H., Ando, T. (eds) Transport Phenomena in Mesoscopic Systems. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, vol 109. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84818-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84818-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-84820-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84818-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics