Relative Export Prices and Firm Size in Imperfect Markets

  • Lorenzo Pupillo
  • Klaus F. Zimmermann
Part of the Studies in International Economics and Institutions book series (INTERN.ECONOM.)


One of the key issues of the rising field in international trade and industrial organization1 is the impact of trade on static efficiency. Attempts are made to relax the assumptions of perfect competition and non-increasing returns to scale, which are dominant in traditional trade theory. The new theories seem to imply that the substantial increase of foreign trade as part of the gross national product in most industrialized countries is beneficial because it has pro-competitive effects on internal market power. In the structure-performance models (e.g., Jacquemin, De Ghellinck, and Huveneers (1980)) the degree of foreign competition is taken to exert an influence on profit margins. This implies that static efficiency is sppurred by international trade.


Firm Size Market Power Foreign Market Domestic Market Imperfect Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ALDRICH, J. H., AND F. D. NELSON (1984): Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills: Sage University Press.Google Scholar
  2. CHIZZOLINI, B., M. NERLOVE, L. PUPILLO, AND D. R. ROSS (1987): “Price and Production Adjustments of British and Italian Industrial Firms,” mimeo., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  3. GLEJSER, H., A. JACQUEMIN, AND J. PETIT (1980): “Exports in an Imperfect Competition Framework: An Analysis of 1,446 Exporters,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. HELPMAN, E., AND P. R. KRUGMAN (1982): Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. JACQUEMIN, A. (1982): “Imperfect Market Structure and International Trade - Some Recent Research,” Kyklos, 35, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. JACQUEMIN, A., E. DE GHELLINCK, AND C. HUVENEERS (1980): “Concentration and Profitability in a Small Open Economy,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 29, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. KAWASAKI, S., J. MCMILLAN, AND K. F. ZIMMERMANN (1983): “Inventories and Price Inflexibility,” Econometrica, 51, 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. KÖNIG, H., M. NERLOVE, AND G. OUDIZ (1981): “On the Formation of Price Expectations: An Analysis of Business Test Data by Log-Linear Probability Models,” European Economic Review, 16, 103–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. KÖNIG, H., AND K. F. ZIMMERMANN (1986): “Innovations, Market Structure and Market Dynamics,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 142, 184–199.Google Scholar
  10. MCKELVEY, R., AND W. ZAVOINA (1975): “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. NERLOVE, M. (1983): “Expectations, Plans, and Realizations in Theory and Practice,” Econometrica, 51, 1257–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. NERLOVE, M., B. CHIZZOLINI, AND L. PUPILLO (1985): “Demand Expectations, Production Plans, Prices and Inventories,” mimeo., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  13. PAGOULATOS, E., AND R. SORENSEN (1986): “What Determines the Elasticity of Industry Demand?” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 4, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ROSS, T. W. (1988): “On the Price Effects of Mergers with Freer Trade,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 6, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. VEALL, M., AND K. F. ZIMMERMANN (1991): “Pseudo-R2’s in the Ordinal Probit Model,” forthcoming Journal of Mathematical Sociology.Google Scholar
  16. VENABLES, A. J. (1985): “International Trade, Trade and Industrial Policy and Imperfect Competition: A Survey,” CEPR - Discussion Paper, London.Google Scholar
  17. ZIMMERMANN, K. F. (1987): “Trade and Dynamic Efficiency,” Kyklos, 40, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Pupillo
  • Klaus F. Zimmermann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations