Some Parametric and Structural Simulations With a three-Dimensional Ecosystem Model of Nitrogen Cycling in the North Atlantic Euphotic Zone

  • J. L. Sarmiento
  • M. J. R. Fasham
  • Richard D. Slater
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NATO ASI, volume 10)

Abstract

The Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) is a major international scientific program with the aim of understanding the role of biological processes in the ocean carbon cycle (the “biological pump”). One of the major aims of this project is to be able to model the effect of the biological pump on carbon dioxide drawdown from the atmosphere and to determine its geographical and seasonal variation and what part this pump may play in climatic change (Fasham et al., 1991). This is an ambitious undertaking and it will be some years before we can judge its success. The first requirement is to develop a model of biological production that possesses some geographical generality; the assumption being that the underlying structure of the marine ecosystem is similar throughout the world ocean but that different physical forcing scenarios give rise to different seasonal cycles and the relative concentrations of the individual components of the food web. One of the problems with developing such a generic model is that even simple biological models contain a large number of parameters which are often difficult to measure and, in any event, represent some average value over the diverse species that make up the phytoplankton, Zooplankton, and bacterial populations. It is still an open question whether such a model can be produced but in the meantime we should investigate candidate models for their agreement with observations and also determine the senstitvity of the models to the parameter set.

Keywords

Biomass Dioxide Convection Chlorophyll Silicate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altabet MA (1989) Particulate new nitrogen fluxes in the Sargasso Sea. J Geophys Res 94:12771–12779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ducklow HW, Fasham MJR (1992) Bacteria in the greenhouse: modeling the role of oceanic plankton in the global carbon cycle. In: Mitchell R (ed) Environmental Microbiology. Wiley-Liss, New York. pp 1–31Google Scholar
  3. Evans GT, Parslow JS (1985) A model of annual plankton cycles. Biol Oceanogr 3:327–347.Google Scholar
  4. Eppley RW (1972) Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea. Fish Bull 70:1063–1085.Google Scholar
  5. Fasham MJR, Ducklow HW, McKelvie DS (1990) A nitrogen-based model of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer. J Mar Res 48:591–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fasham MJR, Denman K, Brewer PG (1991) The Joint Global Ocean Flux Study: goals and objectives. In: Corell RW, Anderson, PA (eds) Global Environmental Change. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp 245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fasham MJR (1992) Modelling the marine biota. In: Heimann M (ed) The Global Carbon Cycle. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. in pressGoogle Scholar
  8. Fasham MJR, Sarmiento JL, Slater RD, Ducklow HW, Williams R (1993) A seasonal three-dimensional ecosystem model of nitrogen cycling in the North Atlantic euphotic zone: a comparison of the model with observations from Bermuda Station “S” and OWS “India”. Global Biogeochem Cycles, in pressGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldman G, Kuring N, Ng C, Esaias W, McClain C, Elrod J, Maynard N, Endres D, Evans R, Brown J, Walsh S, Carle M, Podesta G (1989) Ocean color, availability of the global data set. Eos Trans AGU 70:633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrison DE (1989) On climatological monthly mean wind stress and wind stress curl fields over the world ocean. J Climate 2:57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hellerman S, Rosenstein M (1983) Normal monthly wind stress over the world ocean with error estimates. J Phys Oceanogr 13:1093–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laws EA, Bannister TT (1980) Nutrient-and light-limited growth of Thalassiosira fluviatilis in continuos culture, with implications for phytoplankton growth in the ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 25:457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kawase M, Sarmiento JL (1986) Nutrients in the Atlantic thermocline. J Geophys Res90:8961–8979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Levitus S (1982) Climatological atlas of the world ocean. NOAA Prof Pap 13, US Govt Print Office, Washington, DC 173 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Levitus S, Reid J, Conkright ME, Najjar RG, Mantyla A (1992) The distribution of phosphate, nitrate and silicate in the world ocean. Prog Oceanogr, in pressGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin JH, Knauer GA, Karl DM, Broenkow WM (1987) VERTEX: carbon cycling in the Northeast Pacific. Deep-Sea Res 34:267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Menzel DW, Ryther JH (1960) The annual cycle of primary production in the Sargasso Sea off Bermuda. Deep-Sea Res 6:351–367.Google Scholar
  18. Sakshaug E, Andersen K, Keifer DA (1989) A steady state description of growth and light absorption in the marine planktonic diatom Skeletonema costatum. Limnol Oceanogr 34:198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sarmiento JL (1986) On the North and Tropical Atlantic heat balance. J Geophys Res91:11677–11689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sarmiento JL, Slater RD, Fasham MJR, Ducklow HW, Toggweiler JR, Evans GT (1993) A seasonal three-dimensional ecosystem model of nitrogen cycling in the North Atlantic Euphotic Zone. Global Biogeochem Cycles, in pressGoogle Scholar
  21. Steele JH, Henderson EW (1992) The role of predation in plankton models. J Plankton Res14:157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wroblewski JS (1977) A model of phytoplankton plume formation during variable Oregon upwelling. J Mar Res 35:357–394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Sarmiento
    • 1
  • M. J. R. Fasham
    • 2
  • Richard D. Slater
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.James Rennell Centre for Ocean CirculationChilworth Research CentreSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations