On Measuring the Greenhouse Effect of Earth

  • Graeme L. Stephens
  • Anthony Slingo
  • Mark Webb
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 9)

Abstract

A balance between the amount of sunlight absorbed by the planet and the thermal radiation emitted to space is the primary control of the Earth’s climate. Almost 70% of the solar energy reaching the earth is absorbed by the planet (e.g., Vonder Haar and Suomi, 1971), mainly at the surface. This warms the surface which then emits radiation towards space at longer infrared wavelengths. Radiatively active gases, such as water vapour and carbon dioxide, together with cloud particles, absorb radiation emitted from the surface. These constituents also re-emit infrared radiation but at temperatures which are lower than the surface temperature. This absorption and re-emission provides an effective mechanism for ‘blocking’ the surface emission from escaping to space and helps to maintain higher temperatures than would otherwise occur in the absence of the atmosphere. We call this the greenhouse effect (GE) of the atmosphere based on an analogy with the operation of an actual greenhouse, although this analogy is itself contentious (Bohren, 1987).

Keywords

Dioxide Microwave Remote Sensing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alishouse JC, Synder SA, Vongsathorn J, Ferraro RR, (1990) Determination of oceanic total precipitable water from the SSM/I. IEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing 28: 811–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkstrom BR (1984) The Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE). Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 65: 1170–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohren C (1987) Clouds in a glass of beer. In: Wiley & Sons, New York, p 187 (discussion on page 83)Google Scholar
  4. Eyre JR, Andersson E, McNally AP (to be published) Direct Use of Satellite Sounding Radiances in Numerical Weather Prediction. In: Chedin A, Chahine, MT (eds) High Spectral Resolution Infrared Remote Sensing for Earth’s Weather and Climate Studies. NATO ASI Series, D. Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht Boston Lancaster TokyoGoogle Scholar
  5. Greenwald TJ, Stephens GL, Vonder Haar TH, Jackson DL (to be published) A physical retrieval of cloud liquid water over the global oceans using SSM/I observations. J Geophys ResGoogle Scholar
  6. Harrison EF, Minnis P, Barkstrom BR, Ramanathan V, Cess RD, Gibson GG (1990) Seasonal variation of cloud radiative forcing derived from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment. J Geophys Res 95: 18687–18703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hollinger J, Lo R, Poe C, Savage R, Pierce J (1987) Special Sensor microwave/imager user’s guide. Report Nav Res Lab Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Ingersoll AP (1969) The runaway greenhouse effect: A history of water on Venus. J Atmos Sci 26: 1191–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jackson DL (1992) On the role of SSM/I derived precipitable water over the globe and tropical Pacific. M Sc thesis, Colo State Uni, Ft. Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  10. Kondratyev KY, Moskalenko NI (1984) The role of carbon dioxide and other minor gaseous components and aerosols in the radiation budget. In: Houghton JT (ed) The Global Climate, p 225–232Google Scholar
  11. Liu WT, Wang T, Wentz F (1992) Precipitable water and surface humidity over the global oceans from SSM/I and ECMWF. J Geophys Res 97: 2251–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mihalas D (1978) Stellar Atmospheres. In: Freeman WF (ed) Freeman and Co 2nd edn. Freeman and Co, San Franscisco p 569Google Scholar
  13. North GR, Cahalan RF, Coakley JA (1981) Energy balance climate models. Rev Geophys Space Phys 19: 91–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Petty GW, Katsaros K (1990) New geophysical algorithm for the special sensor mi- crowave imager. 5th Conf on Sat Met and Oceanog Sept. 3–7 London EngGoogle Scholar
  15. Piexoto JP, Oort A (1992) Physics of Climate. American Inst of Phys, New York, p 520Google Scholar
  16. Ramanathan V, Collins W (1991)Thermodynamic regulation of ocean warming by cirrus clouds deduced from observations of the 1987 El Nino. Nature 351: 27–32Google Scholar
  17. Raval A, RamanathanV (1989) Observational determination of the greenhouse effect. Nature 342: 758–761Google Scholar
  18. Reynolds RW (1988) A real—time global sea surface temperature analysis. J Climate 1: 75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rothman LS (1981) AFGL atmospheric absorption line parameters compilation: 1980 version. Appl Opt 20: 791–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schluessel P, Emery WJ (1990) Atmospheric water vapour over oceans from SSM/I measurements. Int J Remote Sensing 11: 753–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Slingo A, Webb MJ (to be published) Simulation of clear—sky outgoing longwave radiation over the oceans using operational analyses. Q J Roy Meteorol SocGoogle Scholar
  22. Stephens GL (1990) On the relationship between water vapour over the oceans and sea surface temperature. J Climate 3: 634–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stephens GL, Greenwald TJ (1991a) Observations of the Earth’s Radiation Budget in Relation to Atmospheric Hydrology. Part II: Cloud Effects and Cloud Feedback. J Geophys Res 96:15, 325–15, 340Google Scholar
  24. Stephens G L, Greenwald TJ (1991b) Observations of the Earth’s Radiation Budget in Relation to Atmospheric Hydrology Part I: Clear Sky Greenhouse Effect and Water vapour Feedback. J Geophys Res 96:15, 311–15, 324Google Scholar
  25. Stephens GL, Tjemkes S (to be published) Water vapour and its role in the Earth’s greenhouse. Australian J PhysGoogle Scholar
  26. Yonder Haar TH, Suomi V (1971) Measurements of the earth’s radiation budget from satellite during a five-year period. Part I: Extended time and space means. J Atmos Sci 28: 305–314Google Scholar
  27. Wu X, Bates JJ, Khalsa SJS (in preparation) Upper tropospheric water vapour climatology derived from TOVS dataGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graeme L. Stephens
    • 1
  • Anthony Slingo
    • 2
  • Mark Webb
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric ScienceColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Met. OfficeHadley Centre for Climate Prediction and ResearchBracknellUK

Personalised recommendations