The Application of the Simulation Model of Neurotic Defence Mechanisms to the Psychoanalytic Theory of Psychosomatic Illness

  • Ilka von Zeppelin
  • Ulrich Moser
Part of the Monographien der Breuninger-Stiftung Stuttgart book series (BREUNINGER)


During the last few years a computer simulation model has been developed by Moser, von Zeppelin & Schneider (1968, 1969,1970a, b) which seeks to formalize the psychoanalytic theory of the defence organization by means of computer languages. Formalization of a theory means that all concepts are broken down and systematically defined, i.e. variables of a system are motivation variables and/or observation variables or can be specified as relations between variables in this system. Simulation makes it possible, by varying the parameter values of the model, to generate on the machine individual variants of defence processes in neurotic conflicts. The model was designed with the aim of defining, by means of a differentiation of the defence process, neurotic states which appear in the simulation as equilibration states of the system or as only very slowly changing states of the system. Especial attention was devoted to the stages between neurosis and psychosis. It was not our intention to simulate psychosomatic states, but the model must be capable of differentiating such states from other patterns of neurosis or psychosis. In order to treat this question in detail, the basic features of the model have to be set forth. The technical aspects are excluded from this discussion. They are exhaustively dealt with elsewhere (Moser et al., 1968,1970a, b).


Psychoanalytic Theory Drive State Defence Process Defence Model Defence Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. De Boor C (1965) Strukturunterschiede unbewusster Phantasien bei Neurosen und psycho-somatischen Krankheiten. Psyche 18:664–673.Google Scholar
  2. Engel GL, Schmale AH (1967) Psychoanalytic theory of somatic disorder. J. Am. psycho-anal. Ass. 15:344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Marty P, De M’Uzan M & David C (1963) L’investigation psychosomatique. Presses Univ. de France, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Mitscherlich A (1961) Anmerkungen über die Chronifizierung psychosomatischen Geschehens. Psyche 15:1–25.Google Scholar
  5. Moser U, von Zeppelin I & Schneider W (1968) Computer-Simulation eines Modells neurotischer Abwehrmechanismen: ein Versuch zur Formalisierung der psychoanalytischen Theorie (klinischer Teil). Bull Psychol Inst Univ Zürich 2:1–78.Google Scholar
  6. Moser U, von Zeppelin I & Schneider W (1969) Computersimulation of a model of neurotic defence processes. (See chapt 3.1.) Int J Psycho-Anal 50:53–64.Google Scholar
  7. Moser U, von Zeppelin I, Schneider W (1970a) Discussion of Computer simulation of a model of neurotic defence processes. (See chapt 3.2.) Int J Psycho-Anal 51:167–173.Google Scholar
  8. Moser U, von Zeppelin I & Schneider W (1970b) Computer simulation of a model of neurotic defence processes (technical part) (See chapt. 3.3.) Behav Sci 15:194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sperling M (1955) Psychosis and psychosomatic illness. Int J Psycho-Anal 36:320–327.Google Scholar
  10. Sperling M (1967) Transference neurosis in patients with psychosomatic disorders. Psycho-anal Q 36:342–355.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilka von Zeppelin
  • Ulrich Moser

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations