Skip to main content

The Credibility Crisis

  • Chapter
Chernobyl

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Environmental Management ((SSEM))

Abstract

Those who said that the twentieth century is the century of the atom didn’t know how right they were. Certainly, the scientific discovery of a particularly powerful new energy source had produced hopes and applications in both the civil and military sectors. In the final equation, though, it is the major accident at Chernobyl that dramatically and suddenly brought the reality of the atom’s presence home to many persons and groups around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ansel, P., Barny, M.-H., and Pages, J.-P., 1987, Débat nucléaire et théorie de l’opinion, Revue Générale Nucléaire, N 5, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., 1987, Toxins, Technology and Natural Disasters, in G. Vandion, Revue Générale Nucléaire, N 5, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., 1987, Toxins, Technology and Natural Disasters, in G. Vandenbos and B. Bryant, eds., Cataclysms, Crises and Catastrophes, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. 1980, Attachment and Loss, Vol. 3: Loss: Sadness and Depression, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., 1963, Le phénomène bureaucratique, Le Seuil, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deicher, M., Lindner, G., Recknagel, E., Ernst A., Hofsäss, H., and Hohenemser, C., 1988, The Accident of Chernobyl, in B. Segerståhl and G. Krömer, eds., Issues and Trends in Risk Research, WP-88-34, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E. and Quarantelli, E.L., 1969, Blame in Disaster: Another Look, Another Viewpoint, in D. Dean ed., Dynamic Social Psychology, Random House, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J., 1987, Le Bluff Technologique, Hachette, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., 1957, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornari, F., 1969, Psychanalyse de la situation atomique, Gallimard, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E., 1963, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guedeney, C. and Mendel, G., 1973, L’angoisse atomique et les centrales nucléaires, Payot, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M.J., 1976, Stress Response Syndromes, Aronson, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M.J., 1985, Disasters and Psychological Responses to Stress, Psychiatric Annals, 15(3):161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E., 1955, Social Systems as a Defense against Persecutory and Depressive Anxiety, Tavistock Publications, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., 1984, Choices, Values and Frames, American Psychologist, 39:341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kübler-Ross, E., 1969, On Death and Dying, Macmillan, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otway, H., 1987, Experts, Risk Communication and Democracy, Risk Analysis, 4:125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C., 1984, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poumadère, M. and Guinchard, R., 1986, Transfert de méthodologie dans un dispositif d’élaboration collective en milieu industriel, Proceedings: IRSST, Meeting on Health and Safety, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poumadère, M. and Mays, C., 1988, The Meaning of Measurement, in R. Polley et al., eds., The SYMLOG Practitioner, Praeger, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roser, T., 1987, Le mouvement des opinions en Europe, Revue Générale Nucléaire, N 5, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shontz, F., 1965, Reactions to Crisis, Volta Review, 67:364–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shontz, F., 1975, The Psychological Aspects of Physical Illness and Disability, Macmillan, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shutz, A., 1962, Multiple Realities, in M. Natanson, ed., Collected Papers, Vol.1: The Problem of Social Reality, Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., 1983, Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., 1984, Mutual Deterrence or Nuclear Suicide, Science, 223:775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villemeur, A., 1988, Sûreté de fonctionnement des systèmes industriels, Eyrolles, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., Salomon, S., and Bartom, P., 1988, Primary Prevention in Aircraft Disasters, American Psychologist 43(9).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg/Austria

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poumadère, M. (1991). The Credibility Crisis. In: Segerståhl, B. (eds) Chernobyl. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84367-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84367-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-84369-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84367-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics