Advertisement

Chernobyl pp 21-42 | Cite as

Monitoring and Assessment

  • Franz Schönhofer
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)

Abstract

The testing of nuclear bombs in the atmosphere in the late 1950s and the early 1960s has led to widespread contamination of air, soil, water, and the biosphere. Many countries have started surveillance programs to monitor contamination. It can be assumed that the high contamination that was found, for instance, in the Scandinavian countries prompted efforts to enact the 1962 treaty of the ban on nuclear tests in the atmosphere. Since then the concentration levels of radionuclides in the environment has declined considerably partly due to decay and partly due to their removal to sinks where they are strongly bound and cannot be recycled into the biosphere. The basic idea of surveillance networks has changed from monitoring fallout, more or less as a means to follow the decline of the artificial contamination in the environment, to monitoring discharges from nuclear power plants and to preparing for the possibility of widespread contamination following a severe reactor accident or even nuclear warfare.

Keywords

Nuclear Power Station Chernobyl Accident Gamma Dose Rate Apply System Analysis Widespread Contamination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, P. and Nyholm, K., 1986, Tjernobyl Mätdata [in Swedish, Chernobyl Measurement Data], Swedish National Radiation Protection Institute, Report 86-23, 7 Oct., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  2. ApSimon, H.M., Goddard, A.J.H., and Wrigley, J., 1985, Long-range Atmosphere Dispersion of Radioisotopes: The MESOS Model, Atmospheric Environment 19(99).Google Scholar
  3. Bengtsson, G., 1988, Cesium i skogen [in Swedish, Cesium in the wood], Strålskyddsnytt [Radiation Protection News], National Swedish Radiation Protection Institute, 6 Sept., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  4. Broadway, J.A., Smith, J.M., Norwood, D.L., Porter, C.R., 1988, Estimates of Radiation Dose and Health Risks to the United States Population Following the Chernobyl Nuclear Plant Accident, Health Physics 55:533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bundesamt für Energiewirtschaft [Switzerland], 1986, Der Unfall Chernobyl [in German, The Chernobyl Accident], Report HSK-AN-1816, Oct., Würenlingen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  6. Bundesamt für Gesundheitswesen [Switzerland], 1986, Verstrahlungslage in der Schweiz nach dem Unfall in Tschernobyl [in German, Contamination Situation in Switzerland after the Accident at Chernobyl], Sept., Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  7. Chien Chung and Cheng-Jong Lee, 1988, Radioenvironmental Monitoring Using a Mobile Compton Suppression Spectrometer and Chernobyl Fallout in Far East, Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Nuclear and Radiochemistry, 11–15 July, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Dunster, H.J., 1987, Experience at Windscale, 1957, Paper presented at the conference on Radionuclides in the Food Chain, 1–5 November 1987, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  9. Eder, E. and Starke, H., 1987, Further Development of the Remote Monitoring System for Nuclear Reactors in Bavaria, Kerntechnik 50(3):157.Google Scholar
  10. Gerusky, T., 1987, Experience of Three Mile Island, Paper presented at the conference on Radionuclides in the Food Chain, 1–5 November 1987, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  11. Gudiksen, P., 1986, ARAC Preliminary Dose Estimates for Chernobyl Reactor Accident, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Håkanson, L., et al., 1988, Cesium i abborre i norrländska sjöar efter Tjernobyl [in Swedish, Cesium in Perch in Northern Swedish Lakes after Chernobyl], Statens Naturvårdsverk [Environmental Protection Authority], April, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  13. Heintschel, H.G., 1986, Die Wasserversorgungs-und Umweltsituation nach dem Unfall von Tschernobyl am Beispiel Wien [in German, The Situation of Water supply and Environment after the Chernobyl Accident in Vienna], Paper presented at the Symposium on Radioactivity and Drinking Water, Oct. 1986, Salzburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  14. Hellmuth, K.-H., 1987, Rapid Determination of Sr-89 and Sr-90 — Experiences and Results with Various Methods after the Chernobyl Accident in 1986, Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, Report STUK A70, May, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, B., 1987, Contamination of sheep in Cumbria, Paper presented at the Workshop of the International Union of Radioecologists on Plant to Animal Transfer, 19–22 Oct., Grange-over-Sands, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Hungarian Atomic Energy Commission, 1986, Radiation Consequences in Hungary of the Chernobyl Accident, July, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  17. Juzdan, Z.R., Feely, H., Klusek, C.S., Larsen R., Leifer, R. and Dreicer, M., 1988, Fallout in the United States of Radioactivity Following the Chernobyl Accident, Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on Radioecology, 14–18 March, Cadarache, France.Google Scholar
  18. Kronraff, R., private communication.Google Scholar
  19. Lagoni, H., Paakkola, O., and Peters, K.J., 1963, Untersuchungen über die quantitative Verteilung radioaktiver Fallout-Produkte in der Milch [in German, Investigations on the Quantitative Distribution of Radioactive Fallout-Products in Milk] Milchwissenschaft 18:340.Google Scholar
  20. Meyerhof, D., private communication.Google Scholar
  21. Ministry of National Health and Welfare (Canada), 1986, Radiological Monitoring Annual Report, Environmental Radioactivity in Canada, Report of the Environmental Health Directorate, Health Protection Branch, 87-EHD-136, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  22. Paretzke, H.G. and Jacob, P., 1987, Erfahrungen nach dem Reaktorunfall von Tschernobyl und Folgerungen für die Überwachung der Umweltradioaktivität aus der Sicht der Strahlenforschung [in German, Experience after the Chernobyl Accident and Consequences for Civilians of Environmental Radioactivity], Paper presented at the 7th Conference on Surveillance of Environmental Radioactivity, 16–17 Nov., Munich-Neuherberg, Germany, F.R.Google Scholar
  23. Radiation Safety Study Mission, KAC [Japan], 1986, Data Summary of Fallout from the Chernobyl Reactor, Report, May.Google Scholar
  24. Rantavaara, A., 1987, Radioactivity of Vegetables and Mushrooms in Finland after the Chernobyl Accident in 1986, Report STUK-A59, June, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  25. Saxén R. and Rantavaara, A., 1987, Radioactivity of Freshwater Fish in Finland after the Chernobyl Accident in 1986, Report STUK-A61, June, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  26. Schell, W.R., Breslin, J.P., and Tobin, M.J., 1988, Recycling and Removal of Radionuclides in Forest Soil Resulting from Nuclear Accident, Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium of Radioecology, 14–18 March, Cadarache, France.Google Scholar
  27. Schönhofer, F. and Sattler, H., 1988, Contamination of Fish in Austria Following the Chernobyl Accident, Paper presented at the Meeting of the Working Group on Aquatic Radioecology of the International Union of Radioecologists, 16 March, Cadarache, France.Google Scholar
  28. Schönhofer, F. and Tataruch, F., 1988, Contamination of Game in Austria after the Chernobyl Accident, Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Nuclear Methods in Agriculture, 29 Aug.–2 Sept., Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  29. Schönhofer, F. and Weisz, J., 1987, Measurement by Ultra Low-level Liquid Scintillation Counting Following the Chernobyl Accident, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 115(1):125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schönhofer, F., Ecker, W., Hojesky, H., Junger, W., Kienzl, K., Nowak, H., Riss, A., Vychytil, P., and Zechner, J., 1986, Tschernobyl und die Folgen für Österreich [in German, Chernobyl and its Impact on Austria], Ministry of Health and Environment Protection, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  31. Slater, D., 1987, Risk Management of Potentially Hazardous Industrial Installations, Paper presented at the Conference on Technological Risk in Modern Society, 18–20 March, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  32. SSI [Swedish National Institute of Radiation Protection], 1986a, Activities of the Swedish Authorities following the Fallout from the Soviet Chernobyl Reactor Accident, Report 1986-05-12, May, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  33. SSI, 1986b, Chernobyl — Its Impact on Sweden, Report 86–12, August, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  34. Statens Haverikommission, 1986, Beredskap efter Tjernobyl [in Swedish, Preparedness after Chernobyl], Oct., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  35. STUK, [Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety], 1986a, Interim Report on Fallout Situation in Finland from April 26 to May 4, Report STUK-B-VALO44, May, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  36. STUK, 1986b, Second Interim Report on Radiation Situation in Finland from 5 to 16 May 1986, Report STUK-B-VALO45, May, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  37. Tschirf, E., Baumann, W., Niesner, R., and Vychytil, P., 1975, Strahlenkarte Österreichs [in German, Austrian Map of Natural Radiation], Ministry for Health and Environmental Protection, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  38. van Egmond, N.D. and Kesseboom, H., 1983, Mesoscale Air Pollution Dispersion Models I: Eulerian GRID Model, Atmospheric Environment 17:257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weiss, W., Sartorius, H., Stockburger, H., Sittkus, A., and Rath, H.K., 1986, Die Radioaktivität der bodennahen Luft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Zeitraum 29 April bis 10 Mai 1986 [in German, Radioactivity of Air in the Federal Republic of Germany from 29 April to 10 May 1986], Bundesamt für Zivilschutz, Institut für Atmosphärische Radioaktivität, Freiburg, Germany, F.R.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg/Austria 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franz Schönhofer
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal Institute for Food Control and ResearchViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations