How Likely is Multiple Site Damage?

  • Oscar Orringer
Part of the Springer Series in Computational Mechanics book series (SSCMECH)


One way to avoid multiple site damage in airframes of the future is to screen design details by means of coupon tests. A simple conceptual model for estimating the risk of multiple site damage is presented. The risk is expressed as the fraction of similar details which can be expected to form fatigue cracks at times close enough to each other to allow a fracture cascade after the damage has propagated. Examples based on an approximate representation of typical transport category fuselage skin properties and stress environments show that the risk becomes significant for details which exhibit much less fatigue life scatter than is observed in plain fatigue tests and for which the characteristic life is of the order of the service life. Results for confidence limits are also presented to show that at least 40 replicate details must be tested to obtain adequate estimates of scatter and characteristic life.


Fatigue Life Fatigue Crack Growth Stress Intensity Factor Range Life Distribution Scatter Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Weibull, W.: Fatigue Testing and Analysis of Results. New York; London: Pergamon Press 1961.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hahn, G. J.; Shapiro, S.S.: Statistical Models in Engineering. New York: Wiley 1967.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breiman, L.: Statistics: With a View Toward Applications. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. 1973.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar Orringer
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Department of TransportationTransportation Systems CenterCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations