Skip to main content

Backtracking of Jobs and Machine Location Problems

  • Conference paper
Material Handling ’90

Part of the book series: Progress in Material Handling and Logistics ((LOGISTICS,volume 2))

Abstract

In flexible manufacturing systems, production lines are often laid out along a linear track. In these lines, facilities engineers attempt to simplify the workflow of jobs by avoiding a job shop structure in favor of a generalized flow line (GFL) by assigning machines to appropriate locations in the layout. The upstream flow of materials in a production line is called backtracking. Determining an optimum assignment of M unique machines to exactly M locations along a track to minimize the total backtracking of jobs is computationally intractable. Therefore, an efficient heuristic is developed in this chapter to overcome these difficulties.

An ideal (GFL) incurs no backtracking. In many cases, achieving a GFL is not feasible because of the routing required by jobs. The relative amount of backtracking which does occur in such a configuration is an indication of the degree to which the ideal (and most productive) case is achieved. A measure of backtracking is developed in this chapter to assess the degree which a configuration achieves a (GFL). A simulation model is used to assess the effect of reducing backtracking on overall system performance in day-to-day dynamic operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazaraa, M.S. and O. Kirca, “An Branch-and-Bound-Based Heuristic for Solving the Quadratic Assignment Problem,” Naval Research Logistic Quarterly, 30, pp. 287–304 (1983).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozer, Y.A. and M.M. Srinivasan, “Tandem Configurations for AGV Systems Offer Simplicity and Flexibility,” Industrial Engineering, 21(2), pp. 23–27 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conway, R.W., W.L. Maxwell and L.W. Miller, Theory of Scheduling, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Chapter 5 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gavett, J.W. and N.V. Plyter, “The Optimal Assignment of Facilities to Locations by Branch and Bound,” Operations Research, 14, pp. 210–232 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hillier, F.S., “Quantitative Tools for Plant Layout Analysis,” Journal of Industrial Engineering, 14, pp. 33–40 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murtagh, B.A., T.R. Jefferson and V. Sornprasit,“Heuristic Procedure for Solving the Quadratic Assignment Problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, 9, pp. 71–76 (1982).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Obata, T., “Quadratic Assignment Problem: Evaluation of Exact and Heuristic Algorithms,” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Picone, C.J. and W.E. Wilhelm, “A Perturbation Scheme to Improve Hillier’s Solution to the Facilities Location Problem,” Management Science, 30, pp. 1238–1249 (1984).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Saboo, S., L. Wang and W.E. Wilhelm, “Recursion Models for Describing and Managing the Transient Flow of Materials in Generalized Flow Lines”, Management Science, 35, pp. 722–742 (1989).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarker, B.R., “The Amoebic Matrix and One-Dimensional Machine Location Problems,” PhD Dissertation, Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (December 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sarker, B.R., W.E. Wilhelm and G.L. Hogg, “Amoebic Matrix and Machine Location Problems,” Working Paper INEN/MS/WP/07/11-88, Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shapiro, C.W. and H.L.W. Nuttle, “Hoist Scheduling for a PCB Electroplating Facility,” IIE Transactions, 19, pp. 157–166 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinberg, L., “The Backboard Wiring Problem: A Placement Algorithm,” SIAM Review, 43, pp. 37–50 (1961).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sarker, B.R., Wilhelm, W.E., Hogg, G.L., Han, MH. (1991). Backtracking of Jobs and Machine Location Problems. In: Material Handling ’90. Progress in Material Handling and Logistics, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84356-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84356-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-84358-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84356-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics