A Group Technology Approach for Container Size Selection
The problem considered in this chapter is the selection of carton sizes for shipping items produced in a small batch manufacturing environment. Rather than selecting an optimum container design for each item, the problem is that of selecting a single container or a limited number of containers for the variety of items and range of order sizes that are characteristic of the particular small batch manufacturer. The focus is on two issues: cost considerations and the carton size selection method. The relevant cost factors are identified and used as the criteria for evaluating the selected carton sizes. A grouping technique is used to assist in the determination of carton sizes, and the results of the application of the methodology for a set of historical data are evaluated.
KeywordsCost Model Material Handling Storage Cost Damage Cost Internal Packing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Carrabino, J.D., “Determination of Optimum Sizes and Economic Feasibility of Shipping Containers Using Operations Analysis Techniques,” Journal of Industrial Engineering, pp. 513-520 (November 1958).Google Scholar
- 2.Friedman, W.F. and J.J. Kipnees, Distribution Packaging, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company: New York, (1977).Google Scholar
- 3.Gallagher, C.C. and W.A. Knight, Group Technology Production Methods and Manufacture, Ellis Harwood Series, Hoisted Press, (1986).Google Scholar
- 4.Hodgson, T.J., “A Combined Approach to the Pallet Loading Problem,” IIE Transactions, pp. 175-182 (September 1982).Google Scholar
- 5.Hodgson, T.J., D.S. Hughes and L.A. Martin-Vega, “A Note on a Combined Approach to the Pallet Loading Problem,” HE Transactions, pp. 268-271 (September 1983).Google Scholar
- 6.King, E.P. and R.J. Goode, “Application of Operations Research Techniques to a Packaging Problem,” Proceedings of the 14th Midwest Quality Control Conference, pp. 177-182 (September 1959).Google Scholar
- 7.Normandin, G., “Computer Picks the One ‘Best’ Container Size,” Modern Materials Handling, pp. 60-62 (May 1967).Google Scholar
- 8.Peleg, K. and E. Peleg, “Container Dimensions for Optimal Utilization of Storage and Transportation Space,” Computer Aided Design, PP. 175-181 (July 1976).Google Scholar
- 9.Steudel, H.J., “Generating Pallet Loading Patterns: A Special Case of the Two-Dimensional Cutting Stock Problem,” Management Science, pp. 997-1004 (October 1979).Google Scholar
- 10.Tanchoco, J.M.A. and M.H. Agee, “Unit Load Interfaces,” Proceedings of the 1981 National Material Handling Forum, (April 1981).Google Scholar
- 11.Tompkins, J.A. and J.A. White, Facilities Planning, John Wiley and Sons: New York, (1984).Google Scholar
- 12.Udy, J.L., R.J. Balling, S.E. Benzley and M.D. Landon, “Computation of Interferences Between Three Dimensional Objects and the Optimal Packing Problem,” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol.10, No.1, pp. 8–14 (1988).Google Scholar