A Group Technology Approach for Container Size Selection

  • Jessica O. Matson
  • Girish N. Naik
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Material Handling and Logistics book series (LOGISTICS, volume 2)

Abstract

The problem considered in this chapter is the selection of carton sizes for shipping items produced in a small batch manufacturing environment. Rather than selecting an optimum container design for each item, the problem is that of selecting a single container or a limited number of containers for the variety of items and range of order sizes that are characteristic of the particular small batch manufacturer. The focus is on two issues: cost considerations and the carton size selection method. The relevant cost factors are identified and used as the criteria for evaluating the selected carton sizes. A grouping technique is used to assist in the determination of carton sizes, and the results of the application of the methodology for a set of historical data are evaluated.

Keywords

Shipping Styrofoam 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carrabino, J.D., “Determination of Optimum Sizes and Economic Feasibility of Shipping Containers Using Operations Analysis Techniques,” Journal of Industrial Engineering, pp. 513-520 (November 1958).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedman, W.F. and J.J. Kipnees, Distribution Packaging, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company: New York, (1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gallagher, C.C. and W.A. Knight, Group Technology Production Methods and Manufacture, Ellis Harwood Series, Hoisted Press, (1986).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hodgson, T.J., “A Combined Approach to the Pallet Loading Problem,” IIE Transactions, pp. 175-182 (September 1982).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hodgson, T.J., D.S. Hughes and L.A. Martin-Vega, “A Note on a Combined Approach to the Pallet Loading Problem,” HE Transactions, pp. 268-271 (September 1983).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    King, E.P. and R.J. Goode, “Application of Operations Research Techniques to a Packaging Problem,” Proceedings of the 14th Midwest Quality Control Conference, pp. 177-182 (September 1959).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Normandin, G., “Computer Picks the One ‘Best’ Container Size,” Modern Materials Handling, pp. 60-62 (May 1967).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peleg, K. and E. Peleg, “Container Dimensions for Optimal Utilization of Storage and Transportation Space,” Computer Aided Design, PP. 175-181 (July 1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steudel, H.J., “Generating Pallet Loading Patterns: A Special Case of the Two-Dimensional Cutting Stock Problem,” Management Science, pp. 997-1004 (October 1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tanchoco, J.M.A. and M.H. Agee, “Unit Load Interfaces,” Proceedings of the 1981 National Material Handling Forum, (April 1981).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tompkins, J.A. and J.A. White, Facilities Planning, John Wiley and Sons: New York, (1984).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Udy, J.L., R.J. Balling, S.E. Benzley and M.D. Landon, “Computation of Interferences Between Three Dimensional Objects and the Optimal Packing Problem,” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol.10, No.1, pp. 8–14 (1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica O. Matson
    • 1
  • Girish N. Naik
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of AlabamaUSA

Personalised recommendations