A Virtual Cell Scheduling Algorithm

  • Jocelyn R. Drolet
  • Colin L. Moodie
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Material Handling and Logistics book series (LOGISTICS, volume 2)


In this chapter, we begin by defining a new manufacturing concept termed Virtual Cellular Manufacturing System (VCMS). The VCMS is an expansion of the virtual cell concept proposed by McLean and all at the NIST AMRF in the early 1980’s [4].

Then, we will show how the virtual cellular concept can be a provider of flexibility for factories of the future. A time-phased linear programming algorithm which has been developed especially for controlling VCMS will be presented. Finally, a simulation comparison between a VCMS and a Group Technology Cell has been performed. Results obtained from the simulations demonstrate the superiority of VCMS over the GT Cell System.


Machine Tool Material Handling Facility Layout Virtual Cell Machine Utilization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bullinger, H.J., H.P. Warnecke, and H. Lentes, “Toward the Factory of the Future,” Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Production Research (August 1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drolet, J.R., “Scheduling Virtual Cellular Manufacturing Systems,” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University (June 1989).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greene, T.J. and C.M. Cleary, “Is Cellular Manufacturing Right for You?”, Proceedings of Annual International Industrial Engineering Conference (1985).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McLean, C.R., H.M. Bloom, and T.H. Hopp, “The Virtual Manufacturing Cell,” Proceedings of Fourth IFAC/IFIP Conference on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing Technology, Gaithersberg, MD (October 1982).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schonberger, R.J., World Class Manufacturing: The Lessons of Simplicity Applied, The Free Press, New York, NY (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solberg, J.J., D.C. Anderson, M.M. Barash, and R.P. Paul, “Factories of the Future: Defining the Target,” A report of a research study conducted under National Science Foundation Grant MEA 82212044, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN (January 1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sule, D.R., Manufacturing Facilities, PWS-KENT Publishing Company (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tompkins, J.A. and J.D. Spain, “Utilization of Spine Concept Maximizes Modularity in Facilities Planning,” Industrial Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 34–42 (March 1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tompkins, J.A. and J.A. White, Facilities Planning, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drolet, J.R and B. Montreuil, “An Efficient Model for Scheduling Virtual Cellular Manufacturing Cell Systems,” Unpublished working paper, University of Quebec (January 1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jocelyn R. Drolet
    • 1
  • Colin L. Moodie
    • 2
  1. 1.Universite du Quebec a Trois-RivieresCanada
  2. 2.Purdue UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations