Performance Modeling for a Single Material Handling Device with Random Service Requests — Blocking with Recourse

  • Zulma R. Toros Ramos
  • Leon F. McGinnis
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Material Handling and Logistics book series (LOGISTICS, volume 2)

Abstract

In this chapter, a manufacturing cell is studied in which a single device provides movement between a number of distinct locations and temporary storage is provided between work centers. For the cell under consideration, a bootstrapping strategy is proposed for analyzing the performance of the material handling device. The bootstrapping strategy is based on a finite network of queues model. The proposed strategy is evaluated by means of a computational study. Results from the proposed strategy are compared to results obtained from a high-fidelity discrete event simulation for a microload automated storage/retrieval (AS/R) system.

Keywords

Transportation Dispatch 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Buzen, J.P.,“Computational Algorithms for Closed Queueing Networks with Exponential Servers,” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 16, 9, pp. 527–531 (1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chin, K.E., Networks of Queues with State Dependent Flows, Ph.D. Dissertation. School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA (1986).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Egbelu, P.J., “The Use of Non-Simulation Approaches in Estimating Vehicle Requirements in an Automated Guided Vehicle Based Transport System,” Material Flow, 4, pp. 17–32 (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graver, T.W. and L.F. McGinnis, “A Tool Provisioning Problem in an FMS,” International Journal of Fexible Manufacturing Systems, To Appear (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuhn, A., “Efficient Planning of AGVS by Analytical Methods,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automated Guided Vehicle Systems and 16th IPA Conference (1983).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Potts, R.B. and R.M. Oliver, Flows in Transportation Networks, Academic Press, New York and London (1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quiroz, M.A., Simulation of a Microload Automated Storage/Retrieval System, Master Thesis, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA (1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Solberg, J.J., “A Mathematical Model of a Computerized Manufacturing System”, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Production Research, Tokyo (1977).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suri, R., “Robutness of Queueing Networks Formulas,” Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 30, 3, pp. 564–594 (1983).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suri, R. and Y.C. Tay, “Error Bounds for Performance Prediction in Queueing Networks,” Association for Computing Machinery Transactions on Computer Systems, 3, 3, pp. 227–254 (1985).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toro Ramos, Zulma R., Network of Queues and Decomposition Methods for Modeling Manufacturing Systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA (1988).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Toro Ramos, Zulma R. and L.F. McGinnis, “Performance Modeling for a Single Material Handling Device with Random Service Requests, Part I: Pure Blocking,” Submitted to IIE Transactions (1989).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yao, D.D. and J.A. Buzacott, “Modeling the Performance of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” International Journal of Production Research, 23, pp. 945–959 (1985).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yao, D.D. and J.A. Buzacott, “Models of Flexible Manufacturing Systems with Limited Local Buffers,” International Journal of Production Research, 24, 1, pp. 107–118 (1986).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zulma R. Toros Ramos
    • 1
  • Leon F. McGinnis
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Puerto RicoPuerto Rico
  2. 2.Georgia Institute of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations